It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 13:14

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Worker's condition

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 21 Feb 2009
Posts: 108

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2009, 02:43
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Plz explain why D is not a better choice since the sentence starteed with past tense and D appropriately continues the sentence in past tense.
Attachments

SC1.jpg [ 84.85 KiB | Viewed 1228 times ]

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 4

Manager
Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Posts: 148

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2009, 05:08
I can think of only one difference

B is investigating the effects whereas D seems to investigate the changes.
Looks like a case of misplaced modifier.
Opinions anyone?

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 356

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 15

Location: San Francisco

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2009, 09:11
D indicates that the conditions themselves haven't changed but only their effects have. that's not the intended meaning of the original sentence

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 15

Director
Joined: 03 Jun 2009
Posts: 782

Kudos [?]: 902 [1], given: 56

Location: New Delhi
WE 1: 5.5 yrs in IT

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2009, 09:37
1
KUDOS
Tough one. I think B is correct answer.

A. is out for using "experiments that would investigate...". Here investigation is happening at the same time, so "investigating" should be a better option. If we choose "would" (which is past of "will"), it sounds as if the investigations will happen at a later stage.

B. Correct. B is using "would" in the phrase "changes in working condition would have". Clearly the changes (i.e. the result of experiment) will come at a later stage, and not at the same time.
Present participle form of "investigating" is correctly used, modifying the experiments.

C.Sounds awkward and wordy. "what" is redundant. Better option would have been "investigating the effects" rather then "investigating what the effects"

D. "that investigated" sounds as if the experiments just invetigated once. "working conditions effects' on" sounds awkward. Also it sounds as if changes have happened on "working conditions effects' " and not on "working conditionS"

E. "what" is redundant. Infinitive form "to investigate" would have been better if we wanted to express the intention for conducting experiments. But here experiments are already in progress.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 902 [1], given: 56

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 286

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 15

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2009, 09:42
"effects" of "changes, not of "working conditions"

I never like picking up a choice which has an inanimate object in possessive.
Further, here the possessive on "working conditions" doesn't make any sense.

The effects were due to CHANGES in something, not due to that something.

Kudos [?]: 155 [0], given: 15

Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 855

Kudos [?]: 488 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2009, 03:36
please post questions without OA's highlighted.

The question is talking about "effects of changes in working conditions" as in B, and not "changes in...effects" as in D.

Kudos [?]: 488 [0], given: 7

Re: Worker's condition   [#permalink] 23 Jul 2009, 03:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by