Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2008
Posts: 162

Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Jul 2008, 08:32
1
This post received KUDOS
3
This post was BOOKMARKED
Question Stats:
75% (01:51) correct 25% (01:37) wrong based on 532 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce 1/4 of the units produced last Friday. Then machine M started working and the two machines, working simultaneously at their respective constant rates, took 6 hours to produce the rest of the units produced last Friday. How many hours would it have taken machine M, working alone at its constant rate, to produce all of the units produced last Friday? A. 8 B. 12 C. 16 D. 24 E. 30
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7944
Location: Pune, India

Re: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce [#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jul 2011, 21:28
2
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
sset009 wrote: 8. Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce ¼ of the units produced last Friday. Then machine M started working and the two machines, working simultaneously at their respective constant rates, took 6 hours to produce the rest of the unites produced last Friday. How many hours would it have taken machine M, working along at its constant rate, to produce all of the units produced last Friday? (A) 8 (B) 12 (C) 16 (D) 24 (E) 30
Try using Ratios. It needs some effort in the beginning but is very rewarding. I solve all these questions orally using ratios. I will tell you how. Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce ¼ of the units produced last Friday. Ok. K takes 3 hrs for 1/4 of units so it takes 12 hrs for all units. Then machine M started working and the two machines, working simultaneously at their respective constant rates, took 6 hours to produce the rest of the unites produced last Friday.In 6 hrs, they both together produced 3/4 of units. K alone would have taken 9 hrs to produce 3/4 of units (since it takes 3 hrs for 1/4 of units) Ratio of time taken together : time taken by K = 6:9 = 2:3 Ratio of speed together : speed of K = 3:2 Since speed together is 3 and speed of K is 2, speed of M alone is 1 i.e. speed of K is twice the speed of M. So M will take twice the time taken by K. Since K takes 12 hrs to produce all the units alone, M will take 24 hrs to produce all the units alone. For more on Ratios, check http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/03 ... ofratios/http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/03 ... osintsd/http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/03 ... problems/
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep  GMAT Instructor My Blog
Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199
Veritas Prep Reviews



Intern
Joined: 16 Aug 2012
Posts: 3
Location: United States

Re: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Nov 2012, 21:44
2
This post received KUDOS
10
This post was BOOKMARKED
Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce 1/4 of the units produced last Friday. Then machine M started working and the two machines, working simultaneously at their respective constant rates, took 6 hours to produce the rest of the units produced last Friday. How many hours would it have taken machine M, working alone at its constant rate, to produce all of the units produced last Friday?
A. 8 B. 12 C. 16 D. 24 E. 30
Last edited by Bunuel on 30 Nov 2012, 02:07, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic, edited the question and added the OA.



VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1212
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)

Re: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Nov 2012, 22:09
1
This post received KUDOS
Lets assume the work to be something like moving 24 bricks. (Three fourths of 24 gives a multiple of 6 & one fourth of 24 gives a multiple of 3. Hence we are selecting 24 for ease of calculation. This method should work fine for any number) Machine K works at 2 bricks per hour K & M together work at 3 bricks per hour So, M works at 1 brick per hour So, M working alone would have took 24 hours. Answer should be D
_________________
Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.
Thanks To The Almighty  My GMAT Debrief
GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types



Intern
Joined: 16 Aug 2012
Posts: 3
Location: United States

Re: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Nov 2012, 23:21
the explanation sounds logical and the correct answer to this is D.Though,that's the (pick an answer an work upon) approach.how can we approach the same question through the conventional method (conceptual), by taking out the respective rates etc.can any one explain?



Senior Manager
Joined: 22 Dec 2011
Posts: 294

Re: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Nov 2012, 23:32
7
This post received KUDOS
samdarsh88 wrote: the explanation sounds logical and the correct answer to this is D.Though,that's the (pick an answer an work upon) approach.how can we approach the same question through the conventional method (conceptual), by taking out the respective rates etc.can any one explain? 1st 2nd and 3 columns are Rate, Time and Work done. R * 3 = 1/4 so rate of K = 1/12 Now 3/4 of the job is done by both K and M in 6 hrs (1/12 + rate of M ) * 6 = 3/4 solving we get rate of M = 1/24 Finally R * t = W 1/24 * t = 1 there t = 24 hrs HTH. Cheers



Intern
Joined: 16 Aug 2012
Posts: 3
Location: United States

Re: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Nov 2012, 23:41
thanks for the explanation jp27.seems ,i was committing a careless mistake before. Hail guys.



VP
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1212
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)

Re: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Nov 2012, 00:31
samdarsh88 wrote: the explanation sounds logical and the correct answer to this is D.Though,that's the (pick an answer an work upon) approach.how can we approach the same question through the conventional method (conceptual), by taking out the respective rates etc.can any one explain? As I mentioned in my previous comment, I was not picking an answer. Rather I was just picking a smart number. In this case both happened to be the same. The same method would work just as well with any other number. Illustration : Lets assume the work to be making 30 bricks : \(Rate of Machine K = \frac{30}{4*3} = \frac{30}{12}\) \(Rate of K & M together = \frac{30*3}{4*6} = \frac{90}{24} = \frac{45}{12}\) \(Rate of machine M = \frac{45}{12}  \frac{30}{12} = \frac{15}{12} = \frac{5}{4}\) \(Machine M alone = \frac{30}{5/4} = \frac{120}{5} = 24\) So, we can see that answer is still 24. I had picked 24 only to avoid fractions.
_________________
Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.
Thanks To The Almighty  My GMAT Debrief
GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types



Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2011
Posts: 118
Location: India
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)

Re: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Nov 2012, 01:28
rate of machine k = (1/4)/3 (i.e it takes 3 hours to complete 1/4 of the work) > 1/12
Now both M and K working together at their respective rate complete 3/4 (the remaining work i.e 1 1/4) of the work in 6 hours.
1/12 + 1/M = (3/4)/6 M = 24
hence the answer is D...



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 43853

Re: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Nov 2012, 02:18
4
This post received KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
samdarsh88 wrote: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce 1/4 of the units produced last Friday. Then machine M started working and the two machines, working simultaneously at their respective constant rates, took 6 hours to produce the rest of the units produced last Friday. How many hours would it have taken machine M, working alone at its constant rate, to produce all of the units produced last Friday?
A. 8 B. 12 C. 16 D. 24 E. 30 Given that machines M and K, working together, can produce 3/4 of units in 6 hours. Since also given that machine K can produce 1/4 of units in 3 hours, then in 6 hours it can produce 2/4 of units. Which means that when working together, machine M produced 3/42/4=1/4 of units in 6 hours, thus it needs 6*4=24 hours to produce all of the units. Answer: D.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Manager
Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 91
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.3

Re: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce [#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Dec 2015, 15:44
samdarsh88 wrote: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce 1/4 of the units produced last Friday. Then machine M started working and the two machines, working simultaneously at their respective constant rates, took 6 hours to produce the rest of the units produced last Friday. How many hours would it have taken machine M, working alone at its constant rate, to produce all of the units produced last Friday?
A. 8 B. 12 C. 16 D. 24 E. 30 Machine K in 6 hours produced 2/4 As Machine K already had produced 1/4, so machine M produced only 1/4 in 6 hours 1/4x = 6 x = 24



SVP
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Posts: 1955
Location: India
GMAT: INSIGHT
WE: Education (Education)

Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce [#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Sep 2017, 18:03
sset009 wrote: Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce 1/4 of the units produced last Friday. Then machine M started working and the two machines, working simultaneously at their respective constant rates, took 6 hours to produce the rest of the units produced last Friday. How many hours would it have taken machine M, working alone at its constant rate, to produce all of the units produced last Friday?
A. 8 B. 12 C. 16 D. 24 E. 30 Answer: option D Check attachment
Attachments
File comment: www.GMATinsight.com
Sol 2.jpg [ 97.95 KiB  Viewed 1458 times ]
_________________
Prosper!!! GMATinsight Bhoopendra Singh and Dr.Sushma Jha email: info@GMATinsight.com I Call us : +919999687183 / 9891333772 Online OneonOne Skype based classes and Classroom Coaching in South and West Delhi http://www.GMATinsight.com/testimonials.html
22 ONLINE FREE (FULL LENGTH) GMAT CAT (PRACTICE TESTS) LINK COLLECTION




Working alone at its constant rate, machine K took 3 hours to produce
[#permalink]
09 Sep 2017, 18:03






