Thanks for saying what you think. That's the point of the forum
To pull a lesson out of this, I think we can realize the difference between a label and branding. Something may be labeled GMATClub, but it can be branded to be more than just GMAT. Take Under Armour for example. At first glance this may appear to be representative of impenetrable metal placed beneath one's clothing. However, in reality this is not the case. Under Armour has been well branded to include a vast array of athletic clothing; however, it's name may mislead some prospective users. And yes, for those HBS and Darden admits, do expect to see this case discussed next year.
For those that couldn't tell, or don't know me, that was an attempt at humor. Let nothing I wrote be taken in the wrong way or out of context.
In the most recent season of Entourage, the guys head out to the desert to find direction and Vincent can then decide if he is supposed to do smoke jumpers. What was it that they called that trek out there? I thought it had some name they referred to it as. Maybe you see where I'm headed with that...
fugo wrote:
jallenmorris wrote:
By your same reasoning, if we change the name to MBA Club, or something similar, will we miss people looking for GMAT help? They'll see MBAClub or MBAJourney (which I really like this name by the way) and think it's not help for the GMAT.
yeah i would guess MBA club may exclude those looking for GMAT help. I do think MBAJourney is more encompassing - since its hard to think of the GMAT as anything else but a step in the MBA Journey.
anyways, was sharing my experience. I dont know that it is typical or representative at all.