It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 00:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# X: Medical research on animals should not be reduced in

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1500

Kudos [?]: 1443 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
X: Medical research on animals should not be reduced in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2010, 14:24
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

64% (01:17) correct 36% (01:45) wrong based on 229 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

X: Medical research on animals should not be reduced in response to a concern for animals, because results of such research serve to avert human suffering. In such research a trade-off between human and animal welfare is always inevitable, but we should give greater weight to human welfare.
Y: With technology that is currently available, much of the research presently performed on animals could instead be done with computer modeling or human subjects without causing any suffering.
The relationship of Y’s response to X’s argument is that Y’s response
(A) contradicts a premise on which X’s argument relies
(B) disagrees with X about the weight to be given to animal suffering as opposed to human suffering
(C) presents a logical consequence of the premises of X’s argument
(D) strengthens X’s argument by presenting evidence not mentioned by X’s argument
(E) supplies a premise to X’s argument that was not explicitly stated
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1443 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Posts: 311

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 44

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2010, 15:02
X: Medical research on animals should not be reduced in response to a concern for animals, because results of such research serve to avert human suffering. In such research a trade-off between human and animal welfare is always inevitable, but we should give greater weight to human welfare.

Y: With technology that is currently available, much of the research presently performed on animals could instead be done with computer modeling or human subjects without causing any suffering.

(A) contradicts a premise on which X’s argument relies - correct
(B) disagrees with X about the weight to be given to animal suffering as opposed to human suffering - X gives weight to human welfare
(C) presents a logical consequence of the premises of X’s argument - incorrect
(D) strengthens X’s argument by presenting evidence not mentioned by X’s argument - incorrect
(E) supplies a premise to X’s argument that was not explicitly stated - incorrect

Hence, A.
_________________

"Success is going from failure to failure without a loss of enthusiam." - Winston Churchill

As vs Like - Check this link : http://www.grammar-quizzes.com/like-as.html.

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 44

SVP
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1500

Kudos [?]: 1443 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2010, 15:37
nsp007 wrote:
X: Medical research on animals should not be reduced in response to a concern for animals, because results of such research serve to avert human suffering. In such research a trade-off between human and animal welfare is always inevitable, but we should give greater weight to human welfare.

Y: With technology that is currently available, much of the research presently performed on animals could instead be done with computer modeling or human subjects without causing any suffering.

(A) contradicts a premise on which X’s argument relies - correct
(B) disagrees with X about the weight to be given to animal suffering as opposed to human suffering - X gives weight to human welfare
(C) presents a logical consequence of the premises of X’s argument - incorrect
(D) strengthens X’s argument by presenting evidence not mentioned by X’s argument - incorrect
(E) supplies a premise to X’s argument that was not explicitly stated - incorrect

Hence, A.

What is the supposedly contradicted premise?
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1443 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Nov 2009
Posts: 311

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 44

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2010, 15:43
X's premise : research on animals(though animals suffer) --> human welfare

Y's contradiction : research presently performed on animals could instead be done with computer modeling or human subjects without causing any suffering.
_________________

"Success is going from failure to failure without a loss of enthusiam." - Winston Churchill

As vs Like - Check this link : http://www.grammar-quizzes.com/like-as.html.

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 44

Intern
Joined: 14 May 2010
Posts: 32

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 1

Schools: CBS

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2010, 00:23
1
KUDOS
I think the premise (which can be both stated or unstated, it is not specified) that Y contradicts is that X assumes that research on animals is the only way to achieve human welfare.
Y contradicts this statement by saying that research could be done with computers and on humans as well.

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 16 Nov 2009
Posts: 17

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2010, 00:49
The premise according to me is "In such research a trade-off between human and animal welfare is always inevitable". And Y's argument says it is not inevitable.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Director
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 26 Nov 2009
Posts: 957

Kudos [?]: 902 [0], given: 36

Location: Singapore
Concentration: General Management, Finance
Schools: Chicago Booth - Class of 2015

### Show Tags

16 Jun 2010, 01:00
i totally agree with the stark difference - "not inevitable" [vijayvenky puts it]
could instead be done = is opposite of "always inevitable"

Kudos [?]: 902 [0], given: 36

VP
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1478

Kudos [?]: 756 [0], given: 6

### Show Tags

20 Jun 2010, 15:50
A for me.

X says the trade off between animal and human welfare is inevitable (unavoidable).

Y says that it is not inevitable because you can always find ways to do the research by some other methods such as computer modeling or on human subjects without causing any suffering.

Kudos [?]: 756 [0], given: 6

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10130

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Re: X: Medical research on animals should not be reduced in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Dec 2014, 10:37
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2604

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 182

Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: X: Medical research on animals should not be reduced in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2016, 07:05
noboru wrote:
X: Medical research on animals should not be reduced in response to a concern for animals, because results of such research serve to avert human suffering. In such research a trade-off between human and animal welfare is always inevitable, but we should give greater weight to human welfare.
Y: With technology that is currently available, much of the research presently performed on animals could instead be done with computer modeling or human subjects without causing any suffering.
The relationship of Y’s response to X’s argument is that Y’s response
(A) contradicts a premise on which X’s argument relies
(B) disagrees with X about the weight to be given to animal suffering as opposed to human suffering
(C) presents a logical consequence of the premises of X’s argument
(D) strengthens X’s argument by presenting evidence not mentioned by X’s argument
(E) supplies a premise to X’s argument that was not explicitly stated

clearly two statements are in contradiction.
C, D, and E are right away out.
between A and B:
B - definitely not, as Y talks about something else.
A remains...

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 182

Re: X: Medical research on animals should not be reduced in   [#permalink] 23 Sep 2016, 07:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# X: Medical research on animals should not be reduced in

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.