GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Aug 2018, 09:40

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 156
GMAT ToolKit User
X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2009, 08:00
1
11
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

52% (01:38) correct 48% (01:37) wrong based on 500 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs, people respond by believing that such accidents are becoming more frequent. This belief is irrational. After all, being dealt four aces in a hand of poker, a rare event, hardly increases one's chances of being dealt four aces in a future hand.
 
Y: To the contrary, the belief is rational because it results in people's sensing a danger to themselves not previously sensed and taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.
 
Y's attempt to counter X's claim is best described by which of the following?

(A) It questions the aptness of the analogy drawn by X.
(B) It makes apparent X's failure to consider how people vary in their responses to a serious accident.
(C) It shifts the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility.
(D) It offers an alternative explanation of why people form incorrect beliefs.
(E) It challenges X's assumption that the occurrence of a single event is sufficient to change a belief.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 May 2009
Posts: 239
Re: Emily Dickinson’s letters  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2009, 08:40
IMO B.

guess it shuld be outnumber......


which in E is wrong....
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 255
Concentration: Nonprofit, Strategy
GPA: 3.42
WE: Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Re: X and Y  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Aug 2009, 16:52
tough one...i had trouble between B and C...went with B because Y did point out X's failure...

but C also seems right..kinda, since C suggest another way to judge rationality of this belief...but B seems better
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Mar 2008
Posts: 46
Re: X and Y  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2009, 08:03
3
1
C seems to be correct. Y does base rationality on the usefulness of the situation. He says that the feeling of fear among the workers is rational or justified because then, they will take extra precautions to avoid the accident. In other words, Y says that because the fear helps the workers to keep safe, it is okay to be fearful. X, on the other hand says, it is not okay to be fearful of a rare accident that may never happen again.
X says Rare event---- not okay to be fearful.
Y says------- Rare or not rare, if it helps to be fearful, its okay to be fearful.
Therefore, both have differing perspectives to rationality.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Affiliations: CFA Level 2 Candidate
Joined: 29 Jun 2009
Posts: 200
Schools: RD 2: Darden Class of 2012
Re: X and Y  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2009, 08:20
I agree with C as well.

X - argues the claim is irrational because just because a rare event has happened does not necessarily mean it is becoming common

Y - supports the claim but does not refute the argument - it shifts the scope and provides an alternative way of defining rationality.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 223
Re: X and Y  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2009, 10:22
IMO B

It rightly says that, there is a different way by which different people might respond to a serious accident and X fails to recognize this fact..
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 291
Re: X and Y  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Aug 2009, 23:59
Can somebody of whom have choosen C explain the last part of the answer choice "rationality to considerations of utility"?

What does considerations of utility mean here?
Current Student
User avatar
Joined: 25 May 2010
Posts: 46
Location: Taiwan
Concentration: Operations, International Business
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.59
WE: Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)
Re: X and Y  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2011, 05:44
B is wrong because no where does X or Y indicate a varying of response to a serious incident.
OA = C
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Sep 2011
Posts: 11
Schools: LBS '14
GMAT Date: 10-24-2011
Re: X and Y  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2011, 07:22
1
mikeCoolBoy wrote:
Can somebody of whom have choosen C explain the last part of the answer choice "rationality to considerations of utility"?

What does considerations of utility mean here?


X says "Taking very RARE event as very FREQUENT is irrational." In other words, "We need not be too SENSITIVE to ONE TIME event."
Y counters "one time event AWAKENS people's sense of danger, thus We can take precautionary actions." In other words, "the belief is USEFUL for preventing similar accidents in the future"

Hope this helps.

By the way, what do POE and IMO stand for?
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 17 Dec 2010
Posts: 10
Schools: ISB
Re: X and Y  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Sep 2011, 08:16
I agree, the answer is (C).
Y is very clearly changing the scope of the argument from one of "rationality" of the event to that of its "usefulness.

@lawsohn
POE - process of elimination
IMO - In my opinion :o
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Retaking next month
Affiliations: None
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Posts: 171
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V27
GPA: 3.01
WE: Sales (Manufacturing)
Re: LSAT CR- Rare but serious industrial accident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Sep 2011, 01:43
Tough one. Totally Puzzled me. Although after seeing the solutions , confident of C now. :)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 10
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Schools: HKUST, ISB
GMAT Date: 11-20-2011
GPA: 3.6
WE: Business Development (Other)
Reviews Badge
Re: LSAT CR- Rare but serious industrial accident  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Oct 2011, 11:36
C

X questions the belief and makes a judgment that the belief is irrational.

Y counters by shifting the basis of the judgment from rationality to consideration of utility (taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.)
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Aug 2011
Posts: 155
GPA: 3.5
Re: X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jan 2012, 22:33
I chose B but understand why it is C.
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2717
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Feb 2016, 19:48
smashingpumpkins wrote:
X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs, people respond by believing that such accidents are becoming more frequent. This belief is irrational. After all, being dealt four aces in a hand of poker, a rare event, hardly increases one's chances of being dealt four aces in a future hand.
 
Y: To the contrary, the belief is rational because it results in people's sensing a danger to themselves not previously sensed and taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.
 
Y's attempt to counter X's claim is best described by which of the following?

(A) It questions the aptness of the analogy drawn by X.
(B) It makes apparent X's failure to consider how people vary in their responses to a serious accident.
(C) It shifts the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility.
(D) It offers an alternative explanation of why people form incorrect beliefs.
(E) It challenges X's assumption that the occurrence of a single event is sufficient to change a belief.



By POE, I got to C.
A - does not question the aptness of the analogy. as a mater of fact, Y doesn't say anything about the analogy presented by X.
B - completely irrelevant.
C - looks good, although the language is complex.
D - no explanation is given why people form incorrect beliefs. moreover, Y considers that the beliefs are rational.
E - it does not.

eliminated all but C, and although C is hard to comprehend, still other answers are flawed.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 Nov 2017
Posts: 5
Re: X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Nov 2017, 02:13
rohansherry wrote:
IMO B.

guess it shuld be outnumber......


which in E is wrong....


What do you
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 26 Jun 2017
Posts: 293
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE: Information Technology (Other)
Re: X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Aug 2018, 22:14
X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs, people respond by believing that such accidents are becoming more frequent. This belief is irrational. After all, being dealt four aces in a hand of poker, a rare event, hardly increases one's chances of being dealt four aces in a future hand.
 
Y: To the contrary, the belief is rational because it results in people's sensing a danger to themselves not previously sensed and taking precautionary actions to prevent similar accidents in the future.
 
Y's attempt to counter X's claim is best described by which of the following?

(A) It questions the aptness of the analogy drawn by X.
We can not choose this option, because Y does not talk about poker

(B) It makes apparent X's failure to consider how people vary in their responses to a serious accident.
We can not say that it is the X's failure. And, moreover, Y does not talk about how people vary.

(C) It shifts the basis for judging rationality to considerations of utility.
Very good. Y mentions a rationality of the belief, but does not prove it, he simply shifts a topic - he talks about utility of the belief. Because people bevome more afraid and now they will take some precautions in future.

(D) It offers an alternative explanation of why people form incorrect beliefs.
Y does not give any alternative explanation

(E) It challenges X's assumption that the occurrence of a single event is sufficient to change a belief.
It dpes not chane anything
Re: X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs, &nbs [#permalink] 05 Aug 2018, 22:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

X: When a rare but serious industrial accident occurs,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.