It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 09:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Posts: 445

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

Location: Cary,NC

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2004, 17:36
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

authorization and manipulating the data and
programs they contain is comparable to joyriding
in stolen cars; both involve breaking into private
property and treating it recklessly. Joyriding,
however, is the more dangerous crime because it
physically endangers people, whereas only
intellectual property is harmed in the case of
computer crimes.

Arjun: I disagree! For example, unauthorized use of
medical records systems in hospitals could
damage data systems on which human lives
depend, and therefore computer crimes also
cause physical harm to people.

The reasoning in Arjunâ€™s response is flawed because he
(A) fails to maintain a distinction made in Yolandaâ€™s argument
(B) denies Yolandaâ€™s conclusion without providing evidence against it
(C) relies on the actuality of a phenomenon that he has only shown to be possible
(D) mistakes something that leads to his conclusion for something that is necessary for his conclusion
(E) uses as evidence a phenomenon that is inconsistent with his own conclusion
_________________

ash
________________________
I'm crossing the bridge.........

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Affiliations: CFA Level 2
Joined: 05 May 2004
Posts: 263

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 0

Location: Hanoi

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2004, 19:47
1 min & A. Arjun failed to maintain the distinction between intellectual & physical harms stated in Yolanda's argument.
_________________

"Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you'r gonna get"

Kudos [?]: 152 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Posts: 445

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

Location: Cary,NC

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2004, 23:38
Wrong

my ans was A too.

try again
_________________

ash
________________________
I'm crossing the bridge.........

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2004
Posts: 170

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Location: Noida, UP

### Show Tags

21 Jul 2004, 23:57
2 min, 5 sec..... C
_________________

--

./abisurd
Not absurd

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 217

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2004, 02:13
C

quote Arjan "For example, unauthorized use of
medical records systems in hospitals COULD
damage data systems on which human lives
depend, and therefore computer crimes also
CAUSE physical harm to people"

Arjan fails to prove that this possibility is a regularity. If fact he says "computer crimes COULD cause harm, therefore they DO CAUSE harm"

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 400

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: India

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2004, 02:25
Will go for (C).

(Initally selected (A), but then had to re-analyze the question!!! )

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 842

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2004, 13:36
C is my FA

Concur with OlegC's explanation

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 01 May 2004
Posts: 335

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 0

Location: USA

### Show Tags

22 Jul 2004, 18:57
My answer is C as well (less than 1 min)

Kudos [?]: 116 [0], given: 0

22 Jul 2004, 18:57
Display posts from previous: Sort by