Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 21:24 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 21:24
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
sideslip
Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Last visit: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatmba
Joined: 16 Aug 2005
Last visit: 14 Jun 2008
Posts: 515
Own Kudos:
Location: France
Posts: 515
Kudos: 115
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
TeHCM
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Last visit: 30 Sep 2013
Posts: 490
Own Kudos:
Location: CA
Posts: 490
Kudos: 1,189
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sideslip
Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Last visit: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Attaching the diagram. Ignore my poor drawing skills. :wink:

I don't see why when P (-sqrt3, 1) the x value of Q (or s) should be 1.
Attachments

GF8U2170.jpg
GF8U2170.jpg [ 44.78 KiB | Viewed 2669 times ]

User avatar
TeHCM
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Last visit: 30 Sep 2013
Posts: 490
Own Kudos:
Location: CA
Posts: 490
Kudos: 1,189
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sorry my bad. I had a different 90 degree angle in mind. The answer is right.

The points formed may not be symmetrical. The triangles formed are identical triangles and these are 30:60:90 triangles so the sides are 1:3^(1/2):2 with the radius being 2

Please execuse my drawing, my drawing is pretty elementary but you get the point :cry:
Attachments

Circle.jpg
Circle.jpg [ 7.46 KiB | Viewed 2597 times ]

User avatar
pesquadero
Joined: 29 Apr 2006
Last visit: 14 Jun 2006
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Posts: 26
Kudos: 77
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Actually, I took a different approach. Please let me know if there is any error in my method.

The distance from (sqrt3,1) to the origin would also be the radius of the circle.
Therefore,
length of line OP = srt((-srt(3)-0}^2 + (1-0)^2)]
= srt(3+1) = srt4
= 2
User avatar
TeHCM
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Last visit: 30 Sep 2013
Posts: 490
Own Kudos:
Location: CA
Posts: 490
Kudos: 1,189
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pesquadero
Actually, I took a different approach. Please let me know if there is any error in my method.

The distance from (sqrt3,1) to the origin would also be the radius of the circle.
Therefore,
length of line OP = srt((-srt(3)-0}^2 + (1-0)^2)]
= srt(3+1) = srt4
= 2


Yes, that's how I knew it was a 30:60:90 triangle :wink:
User avatar
Loner
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Last visit: 08 May 2006
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Posts: 30
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I still don't get it. How do you know it is a 30-60-90. Can you please send the complete explanation
User avatar
TeHCM
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Last visit: 30 Sep 2013
Posts: 490
Own Kudos:
Location: CA
Posts: 490
Kudos: 1,189
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Loner
I still don't get it. How do you know it is a 30-60-90. Can you please send the complete explanation


a 30-60-90 triangle have sides of x, 2x, and x*3^(1/2), in this case, 1, 2, and 3^(1/2), it is just a rule that you have to remember.

And a 45-45-90 triangle have sides of x, x, x*2^(1/2)
User avatar
Loner
Joined: 23 Mar 2006
Last visit: 08 May 2006
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
Posts: 30
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gosh! I was missing a minor point. Thanks a ton buddy!
User avatar
sideslip
Joined: 13 Mar 2006
Last visit: 08 Jun 2006
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 8
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Attaching the diagram. Ignore my poor drawing skills. :wink:

I don't see why when P (-sqrt3, 1) the x value of Q (or s) should be 1.
Attachments

GF8U2170.jpg
GF8U2170.jpg [ 44.78 KiB | Viewed 2632 times ]

User avatar
shevy
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Last visit: 25 Dec 2006
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
Posts: 46
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Where is this problem from?
User avatar
Zooroopa
Joined: 09 Apr 2006
Last visit: 07 Sep 2008
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
Location: Somewhere in Wisconsin!
Posts: 114
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You can solve it without knowing about the nature of the ▲.

__2
OP = 3 + 1 = 4
__2
OQ = s**2 + t**2
__2
PQ = (s+√3)**2 + (t-1) **2

Apply the Pythagorean rules and equate the sum of the two sides to the hypotenuse. You would get s = +/-1. Since s is above the x-axis you should have s = 1.



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Quantitative Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!