Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 21:24 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 21:24
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
devilmirror
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Last visit: 18 Oct 2008
Posts: 101
Own Kudos:
123
 [6]
Posts: 101
Kudos: 123
 [6]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
SimaQ
Joined: 06 Feb 2006
Last visit: 24 May 2007
Posts: 430
Own Kudos:
620
 [1]
Posts: 430
Kudos: 620
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Fig
Joined: 01 May 2006
Last visit: 02 Feb 2025
Posts: 1,031
Own Kudos:
Posts: 1,031
Kudos: 253
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
yezz
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Last visit: 26 Apr 2022
Posts: 833
Own Kudos:
1,661
 [1]
Given Kudos: 49
Posts: 833
Kudos: 1,661
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is -x < 2y
(1) y > -1
(2) (2^x) - 4 > 0

is

2y+x>0

from one we ve no info about x ......insuff

from two

2^x > 2^2

ie: x>2........no info about y insuff

both together

x>2 , y>-1

thus x+y>1

we need to prove that 2y+x>0 ie +ve

x is always +ve

and the maximum -ve value y can be multiplied by two is less than 0

thus C is my answer too
User avatar
devilmirror
Joined: 04 Jan 2006
Last visit: 18 Oct 2008
Posts: 101
Own Kudos:
Posts: 101
Kudos: 123
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
yezz
Is -x < 2y
(1) y > -1
(2) (2^x) - 4 > 0

is

2y+x>0

from one we ve no info about x ......insuff

from two

2^x > 2^2

ie: x>2........no info about y insuff

both together

x>2 , y>-1



a little bit more work from the quote above.

x > 2 (equation 1)
y > -1 or 2y > -2 (equation 2)

(equation 1) + (equation 2)... x + 2y > 2 + (-2)
x + 2y > 0
x > -2y
-x < 2y (this is the same as the question.)

Thus C. is the answer
User avatar
Swagatalakshmi
Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Last visit: 23 Jun 2013
Posts: 432
Own Kudos:
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 432
Kudos: 1,120
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We have to determine whether:-x<2y>-2y


From (1) y>-1 ---- insufficient

From (2)
2^x >2^2
x>2 -----------------insufficient

Combining (1) and (2)
We can say x > -2y

(C)
avatar
hugonhoc
Joined: 23 Nov 2010
Last visit: 11 Dec 2011
Posts: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I go for (C)
1) y>-1
NOT SUFF
2) 2^x - 4 >0
NOT SUFF

Combine:
From 1: y>-1 <=> 2y>-2
From 2: 2^x -4>0 <=> 2^x>2^2 <=> x>2 <=> -x<-2
Therefore: -x<-2<2y <=> -x<2y. Here we go.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,392
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
devilmirror
Is -x < 2y :?:
(1) y > -1
(2) (2^x) - 4 > 0

Quite an old thread is resurrected.

Is -x<2y?

Is \(-x<2y\)? --> rearrange: is \(x+2y>0\)?

(1) y>-1, clearly insufficient as no info about \(x\).

(2) (2^x)-4>0 --> \(2^x>2^2\) --> \(x>2\) --> also insufficient as no info about \(y\).

(1)+(2) \(y>-1\), or \(2y>-2\) and \(x>2\) --> add this inequalities (remember, you can only add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction and you can only apply subtraction when their signs are in the opposite directions) --> \(2y+x>-2+2\) --> \(x+2y>0\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.
User avatar
jlgdr
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Last visit: 24 Jul 2015
Posts: 1,311
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 355
Concentration: Finance
Posts: 1,311
Kudos: 2,863
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
devilmirror
Is -x < 2y ?

(1) y > -1
(2) (2^x) - 4 > 0

Statement 1

y>-1 but no info about 'x'. Not sufficient

Statement 2

x>2, but no info on 'y'. Not sufficient

Statements (1) + (2) together

y + x/2 > 0?

Well, x>2 so x/2>1

And y>-1, so yes it will always be more than zero

Hence C is sufficient

Hope it helps

Cheers!
J :)
User avatar
sanjoo
Joined: 06 Aug 2011
Last visit: 24 Dec 2016
Posts: 266
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 82
Posts: 266
Kudos: 663
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
devilmirror
Is -x < 2y :?:
(1) y > -1
(2) (2^x) - 4 > 0

Quite an old thread is resurrected.

Is -x<2y?

Is \(-x<2y\)? --> rearrange: is \(x+2y>0\)?

(1) y>-1, clearly insufficient as no info about \(x\).

(2) (2^x)-4>0 --> \(2^x>2^2\) --> \(x>2\) --> also insufficient as no info about \(y\).

(1)+(2) \(y>-1\), or \(2y>-2\) and \(x>2\) --> add this inequalities (remember, you can only add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction and you can only apply subtraction when their signs are in the opposite directions) --> \(2y+x>-2+2\) --> \(x+2y>0\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.



I chose C.. thats correct.. bt with different approach

bt Bunuel I didnt get this highlighted thing?? How did u do that?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,392
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sanjoo
Bunuel
devilmirror
Is -x < 2y :?:
(1) y > -1
(2) (2^x) - 4 > 0

Quite an old thread is resurrected.

Is -x<2y?

Is \(-x<2y\)? --> rearrange: is \(x+2y>0\)?

(1) y>-1, clearly insufficient as no info about \(x\).

(2) (2^x)-4>0 --> \(2^x>2^2\) --> \(x>2\) --> also insufficient as no info about \(y\).

(1)+(2) \(y>-1\), or \(2y>-2\) and \(x>2\) --> add this inequalities (remember, you can only add inequalities when their signs are in the same direction and you can only apply subtraction when their signs are in the opposite directions) --> \(2y+x>-2+2\) --> \(x+2y>0\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.



I chose C.. thats correct.. bt with different approach

bt Bunuel I didnt get this highlighted thing?? How did u do that?

\(2y+x>-2+2\) --> re-arrange the left hand side as x+2y. As for the right hand side: -2 + 2 = 0. So, we get \(x+2y>0\).

Hope it's clear.
User avatar
MathRevolution
User avatar
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Last visit: 27 Sep 2022
Posts: 10,070
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
Posts: 10,070
Kudos: 19,393
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. In DS, Variable approach is the easiest and quickest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember equal number of variables and independent equations ensures a solution.


Is -x < 2y ?

(1) y > -1
(2) (2^x) - 4 > 0

In the original condition, there are 2 variables(x,y), which should match with the number of equations. So you need 2 equation. For 1) 1 equation, for 2) 1 equation, which is likely to make C the answer. When 1) & 2), they become y>-1, 2y>-2 and 2^x>4=2^2 --> x>2, -x<-2, which is -x<-2<2y --> -x<2y. So it is yes and sufficient. Therefore, the answer is C.



-> For cases where we need 2 more equations, such as original conditions with “2 variables”, or “3 variables and 1 equation”, or “4 variables and 2 equations”, we have 1 equation each in both 1) and 2). Therefore, there is 70% chance that C is the answer, while E has 25% chance. These two are the majority. In case of common mistake type 3,4, the answer may be from A, B or D but there is only 5% chance. Since C is most likely to be the answer using 1) and 2) separately according to DS definition (It saves us time). Obviously there may be cases where the answer is A, B, D or E.
User avatar
Takdir
Joined: 24 Jul 2016
Last visit: 24 Mar 2018
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 250
Posts: 41
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
devilmirror
Is -x < 2y ?

(1) y > -1
(2) (2^x) - 4 > 0

From statement 1 we get that the lowest possible value of 2Y must be greater than -2 .

From statement 1 we get that x > 2 or -x <-2. so even the highest possible value of -x cannot exceed -2

So from the original equation in the qn we can see that even the highest possible value of "-x" is less than the lowest possible value of "2y"
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,589
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,589
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
496 posts