It is currently 24 Nov 2017, 06:39


GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance


we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.


Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

1- U.S officials complain that the country's trade deficit

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Joined: 08 Jun 2004
Posts: 245

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Location: INDIA
1- U.S officials complain that the country's trade deficit [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jul 2004, 11:44



Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 6 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

1- U.S officials complain that the country's trade deficit with Japan is due to the fact that Japan's markets are not open enough to imports and investment. Japaneese officials reply that the U.S should concentrate on improving its school systems and investing more money in scientific research and worker training .

I found this answer to be out of scope or rather too simple to be accomidate as one....please let me know why the ans is actually so!

It can be infered that the Japnaeese officials hold which of the Opinions ?

A) The U. S should open its own markets, to more imports and investment.

B) The trade deficit between the U.S and Japan is more the result of poor Aamerican performance than Japan's import restrictions

C) The trade defict between the U.S and Japan is a result of Japan's closed markets

D) U.S school systems foster a mistrust of Japan that prevents U.S business people from negotiating intelliegently with Japan

E) Better education and worker training can help shrink the trade imbalance, but should not be counted on to close the gap entirely.

explain the ans!

2- statistics show that although consumption of low-calorie,alternative sweeteners has gone up in each of the past five years , so has the percentage of the population that is obese. Acoording to sugar manufacturers, this shows that low-calorie, alternative sweeteners are not effective weight loss aids.

Which of the following assertions if true, would most weaken the sugar manufacturers conclusion ?

A)Many people who use low-calorie , alternatives sweeteners eat some foods that are not low-calorie.

B)Some low - claorie , alternative sweeteners can Increase the appetite , making a person eat more than he or she normally would eat.

C)Many people use low-calorie, alternative sweeteners to accompany a wel- balanced low-calorie diet

D)Obesity has declined among people who have consistently used low-calorie alternative sweeteners

E) The rise in the consumption of low-calorie alternative sweeteners is primarily due to an increase in the number of users rather than an increase in the amount each user consumes.

answers will follow.....also negate the wrong options so that it can help others know how to get the non-relavnt answerz out.

Have fun :)

the whole worldmakes way for the man who knows wer he's going... good luck

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

User avatar
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0


Show Tags

New post 09 Jul 2004, 12:06
1. B
2. D

It can be inferred that the Japanese have closed doors to the poor quality of product and may be wrong style of investment. If they improve their quality of education, research and training which will help in making better products and services. And this will increase bilateral trade between the countries.

D does the maximum damage to the conclusion drawn by the sugar manufacturer.

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 957

Kudos [?]: 178 [1], given: 0

Location: Florida

Show Tags

New post 09 Jul 2004, 12:44
This post received
1- U.S officials complain ...research and worker training

B for me.
A -> The US says that Japan is not an open market, thus opening US market won't effect Japan's stance -- wrong
C -> Yes we know that... nothing to infer. :)
D -> whoa! Japanese are suggesting The US to concentrate on improving skills/research not on mistrust whatsoever.
E -> last part of this statement quite restricted the scope. We want to trade ...ah!, but we don't really want ...ah!

B -> Japanese negates The US' complain that the trade deficit is b/c of the closed doors, but, it really, is b/c of the lack of skills and training, which Japanese want to embrace from The US.

2- statistics show that although ...effective weight loss aids

A for me... D is staring at me ;)

B -> alright, a good one, but doesn't states clearly whether people ate more of the low-calorie diet itself or switched to somethin else. OUT
C -> just one more premise to what CR already said. OUT
D -> I am stuck on this... need a good explanation from someone :(
E -> good enough, The revenue of the company will increase either way. Doesn't weaken. Just a premise. OUT

A states that there is something else that might have caused the obesity, not the in-effective low fat sweetner. Thus, manufactures are wrong in judging that sweetner is in-effective. It is effective but the effect is overpowered by some other factors.

Kudos [?]: 178 [1], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4284

Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0


Show Tags

New post 09 Jul 2004, 12:59
B and D
1 was widely explained already
2- This is a double negative question. Restated properly, it asks which answer supports the consumption of low-calorie, alternative sweeteners?
A) low-calorie, alternative sweeteners induce consumers to consume other "non-low-calories" food. Does not support use of low-calorie sweeteners.
B) low-calorie, alternative sweeteners make people eat more, that is why they are obese. Does not support use of low-calorie sweeteners.
C) this answer has no impact on obesity and does nothing to support the use of low-calorie sweeteners.
D) sweeteners ARE effective because obese people lost weight by using those sweeteners.
E) out of scope

Best Regards,


Kudos [?]: 537 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 09 Jul 2004, 12:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

1- U.S officials complain that the country's trade deficit

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.