Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
10-13 The general density dependence model can be applied to explain the founding of specialist firms (those attempting to serve a narrow target market). According to this model, specialist foundings hinge on the interplay between legitimation and competitive forces, both of which are functions of the density (total number) of firms in a particular specialist population. Legitimation occurs as a new type of firm moves from being viewed as unfamiliar to being viewed as a natural way to organize. At low density levels, each founding increases legitimation, reducing barriers to entry and easing subsequent foundings. Competition occurs because the resources that firms seek--customers , suppliers, and employees--are limited, but as long as density is low relative to plentiful resources, the addition of another firm has a negligible impact on the intensity of competition. At high density levels, however, competitive effects outweigh legitimation effects, discouraging foundings. The more numerous the competitors, the fiercer the competition will be and the smaller will be the incentive for new firms to enter the field.
While several studies have found a significant correspondence between the density dependence model and actual patterns of foundings, other studies have found patterns not consistent with the model. A possible explanation for this inconsistency is that legitimation and competitive forces transcend national boundaries, while studies typically restrict their analysis to the national level. Thus a national- level analysis can understate the true legitimation and competitive forces as well as the number of foundings in an industry that is internationally integrated. Many industries are or are becoming international, and since media and information easily cross national borders, so should legitimation and its effects on overseas foundings. For example, if a type of firm becomes established in the United States, that information transcends borders, reduces uncertainties, and helps foundings of that type of firm in other countries. Even within national contexts, studies have found more support for the density dependence model when they employ broader geographic units of analysis--for example, finding that the model's operation is seen more clearly at the state and national levels than at city levels.
12. The passage suggests that when a population of specialist firms reaches a high density level, which of the following is likely to occur?
(A) Foundings will decline despite legitimation that has occurred in these industries. (B) Increasing competition will encourage many firms to broaden their target market. (C) Competition for resources will become stabilized and thus foundings will be encouraged. (D) Many customers will abandon their loyalty to older firms as more innovative firms enter the market. (E) Firms will begin to cross national borders in an attempt to gain a competitive advantage. 13. The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) question the validity of an economic model (B) point out some inconsistencies within an economic model (C) outline an economic model and suggest revisions to it (D) describe an economic model and provide specific examples to illustrate its use (E) explain why an economic model remains valid despite inconsistent research results
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
It seems we all agree on 12 so I'll explain my though process for 13.
The article is only 2 paragraphs. The enire 1st paragraph explains the model. The second paragraph points out inconcistencies but finishes explaining uses despite the consistencies. If the purpose was to only point out the consistencies then the author would spend more time on them. Also if the purpose was just to explain the inconsistencies then he/she would not conclude with additional uses despite these consistencies.
It seems we all agree on 12 so I'll explain my though process for 13.
The article is only 2 paragraphs. The enire 1st paragraph explains the model. The second paragraph points out inconcistencies but finishes explaining uses despite the consistencies. If the purpose was to only point out the consistencies then the author would spend more time on them. Also if the purpose was just to explain the inconsistencies then he/she would not conclude with additional uses despite these consistencies.
Show more
12 A , 13-B
My interpretation:
Author is talking about inconsistency of the economic model , he is nowhere mentioning whether these inconsistencies still keep the economic model valid and so it refutes the argument in E.
[b]At high density levels, however, competitive effects outweigh legitimation effects, discouraging foundings[/b] thus A for 12
Paragraph-1 explains the model Paragraph-2 explains the inconsistencies thus B for 13
Show more
But in the second paraghrap the author says: other studies have found patterns not consistent with the model
Does it mean that the author suggests the reversion of what he says in the first paraghrap?
I mean:
In the quout of prasannar: high density discourages foundings. But in the green boldface he say reversally, and means that: the high density courages the foundings. So foundings must increase! is it right?
For 13:
OA is E. I think if E was sitting in the first or the second order, I will choose E immediately. But Gmac is too monster! it keeps the nearly close correct in the first to throw us. Do you think so!
It seems we all agree on 12 so I'll explain my though process for 13.
The article is only 2 paragraphs. The enire 1st paragraph explains the model. The second paragraph points out inconcistencies but finishes explaining uses despite the consistencies. If the purpose was to only point out the consistencies then the author would spend more time on them. Also if the purpose was just to explain the inconsistencies then he/she would not conclude with additional uses despite these consistencies.
12 A , 13-B
My interpretation:
Author is talking about inconsistency of the economic model , he is nowhere mentioning whether these inconsistencies still keep the economic model valid and so it refutes the argument in E.
Show more
When answering the primary purpose question you shoul look at the beginning and ending of the article. The beginning is where you set the tone and explain the topic and the end is where you conclude and summarize what you think about the topic.
The entire first paragraph explains the model.
The second paragraph starts out: "While several studies have found a significant correspondence between the density dependence model and actual patterns of foundings, other studies have found patterns not consistent with the model."
So the author tells us several studies have found consistencies, others have not.
The final sentence conludes: "Even within national contexts, studies have found more support for the density dependence model when they employ broader geographic units of analysis--for example, finding that the model's operation is seen more clearly at the state and national levels than at city levels."
So even after the author points out the inconsistencies he goes back and shows support for the model.
Here is the flow of the article: 1) Describe a model and show that it can work. 2) Show that several studies show consistent results and other do not. 3) Detail why others do not show consistent results. 4) Conclude that despite inconsistent results there is still applicable uses for the model.
90% of the time the primary purpose of the passage is located and the beginning and ending. You should always go back and read atleast those two sentences before choosing.
It seems we all agree on 12 so I'll explain my though process for 13.
The article is only 2 paragraphs. The enire 1st paragraph explains the model. The second paragraph points out inconcistencies but finishes explaining uses despite the consistencies. If the purpose was to only point out the consistencies then the author would spend more time on them. Also if the purpose was just to explain the inconsistencies then he/she would not conclude with additional uses despite these consistencies.
12 A , 13-B
My interpretation:
Author is talking about inconsistency of the economic model , he is nowhere mentioning whether these inconsistencies still keep the economic model valid and so it refutes the argument in E.
When answering the primary purpose question you shoul look at the beginning and ending of the article. The beginning is where you set the tone and explain the topic and the end is where you conclude and summarize what you think about the topic.
The entire first paragraph explains the model.
The second paragraph starts out: "While several studies have found a significant correspondence between the density dependence model and actual patterns of foundings, other studies have found patterns not consistent with the model."
So the author tells us several studies have found consistencies, others have not.
The final sentence conludes: "Even within national contexts, studies have found more support for the density dependence model when they employ broader geographic units of analysis--for example, finding that the model's operation is seen more clearly at the state and national levels than at city levels."
So even after the author points out the inconsistencies he goes back and shows support for the model.
Here is the flow of the article: 1) Describe a model and show that it can work. 2) Show that several studies show consistent results and other do not. 3) Detail why others do not show consistent results. 4) Conclude that despite inconsistent results there is still applicable uses for the model.
90% of the time the primary purpose of the passage is located and the beginning and ending. You should always go back and read atleast those two sentences before choosing.
Show more
Nice! I think you are master of Verbal! :-D
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).
Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.