Many environmentalists believe that the widespread planting of trees,

Question

Many environmentalists believe that the widespread planting of trees, along with the conservation of existing forests, would be  one of the surest, easiest, and least expensive ways to begin to halt or even to reverse  the buildup of carbon dioxide in the air.

(A) one of the surest, easiest, and least expensive ways to begin to halt or even to reverse

(B) one of the most sure, easy, and least expensive ways to begin a halt or even reverse

(C) one of the surest, easiest, and least expensive ways that would begin halting or even reversing

(D) a most sure, easy, and inexpensive way beginning the halting and even reversing of

(E) the most sure, easiest, and inexpensive way that would begin halting or even reversing

https://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/18/science/to-halt-climate-change-scientists-try-trees.html

SCIENTISTS, foresters, environmentalists and Government officials are seriously exploring the feasibility of an ambitious long-term enterprise: planting enough trees around the world to ease the threat of global warming.

The goal is unlikely to be realized dramatically or quickly, if ever, but rather in increments, tree by tree, plot by plot, field by field. Nevertheless, fundamental facts of nature have convinced a number of experts that widespread planting of trees, along with conservation of existing forests, is  one of the surest, easiest and least expensive ways to begin to halt or even reverse  the buildup of carbon dioxide in the air.

jeeteshsingh · Accepted Answer

Many environmentalists believe that the widespread planting of trees, along with the conservation of existing forests, would be  one of the surest, easiest, and least expensive ways to begin to halt or even to reverse  the buildup of carbon dioxide in the air
(A) one of the surest, easiest, and least expensive ways to begin to halt or even to reverse
 Correct - Sounds weird to the ear but is the best choice with surest, easiest and least expensive in parallel... along with halt & reverse in same sync with believe.

(B) one of the most sure, easy, and least expensive ways to begin a halt or even reverse
 most sure... is not in parallel with easy... - Incorrect...

(C) one of the surest, easiest, and least expensive ways that would begin halting or even reversing
 halting and reversing are not parallel with believe which is the main verb... (planting is used as a gerund and existing as an adjective.. Dont consider them as parallel to halting and reversing) - Incorrect

(D) a most sure, easy, and inexpensive way beginning the halting and even reversing of
 way is wrong... it should be ways as we have 2 of them in collection ( widespread planting 'along' with conservation of existing) - Incorrect

(E) the most sure, easiest, and inexpensive way that would begin halting or even reversing
 way is wrong... it should be ways as we have 2 of them in collection ( widespread planting 'along' with conservation of existing) - Incorrect

daagh · Answer

This question may involve fixing idiom, diction, parallelism and meaning clarity errors. But all of them may not be required to be addressed on the D-day. Let me give a quick fix to it.
1. ‘One of the surest’ is the right diction; therefore eliminate B, D and E;
2. Between A and C, you will see that the use of the infinitives ‘to halt’ and ‘to reverse’ is more appropriate idiom to express a purpose rather than the use of gerunds ‘halting’ and ‘reversing’. So A is the correct choice.
3. Go to the next question

KarishmaB · Answer

The basic structure of the sentence is something like this:

Es believe that P would be one of the best ways to begin to halt or reverse C.

There are 3 modifiers for 'ways' - surest, easiest, and least expensive ways
It's best to put them in parallel form where possible.

Since 'sure' and 'easy' have a superlative form, we should use those - 'surest' and 'easiest'
Not that 'most sure' or 'most easy' would be wrong but we use 'most' when we do not have the superlative form such as 'most beautiful.'

Also, 'halt' and 'reversal' are in parallel. So we can use 'to halt' and 'to reverse' OR 'halting' and 'reversing' OR 'a halt' and 'a reversal'
(infinitive, gerund or noun form)

(B) one of the most sure, easy, and least expensive ways to begin a halt or even reverse

'one of the most sure, easy, and least expensive ways' is incorrect. 
Is 'most' common to all 3 modifiers? Cannot be because 'most least expensive' doesn't make sense. 
Then the 3 modifiers are 'most sure,' 'easy,' and 'least expensive'. But 'easy' is not in the superlative form.

Also, 'a halt' (noun form) and 'reverse' (verb form) is not correct. We should use 'a reversal' in this case.

(C) one of the surest, easiest, and least expensive ways that would begin halting or even reversing

When we use 'that would begin halting ...' we are saying that this is what the way would do. The 'that clause' modifies 'the way.' But what we actually want to do is tell the purpose of the 'way.'

Consider these two examples:
 ...this is the best way to begin the project...  (the purpose of the way is to begin the project and in that respect, it is the best way)
 ...this is the best way that would begin the project...  (the sentence tells us that this is the best way. This way would begin the project. Are we looking for a way to begin the project - not known. What is this the best way for? Not known. It is not clear that the purpose of the 'way' is to begin the project)

Hence, option (A) is better than option (C).

(D) a most sure, easy, and inexpensive way beginning the halting and even reversing of
 
This is the structure of (D)
Many Es believe that P would be a most sure ... way beginning the halting and reversing of ...

The use of 'beginning' is incorrect. It uses present participle to modify 'way.' But we do not want to modify 'way.' We need to show the intent, the purpose of the 'way.'
We need to say 'a way to begin the halting ... ' to show the purpose.

(E) the most sure, easiest, and inexpensive way that would begin halting or even reversing
 
Here, 'easiest' does not need 'the most' but 'inexpensive' does. Hence the elements are not parallel. Also, 'that would begin' is not appropriate. We need 'to begin.'

Option (A) is the best in all these aspects.

Answer (A)

boeinz · Answer

(A) one of the surest, easiest, and least expensive ways  to begin to halt  or even to reverse
> 'to begin to halt...' appears wordy.

(B) one of the most sure, easy, and least expensive ways to begin  a halt  or even  reverse 
> not parallel

(C) one of the surest, easiest, and least expensive ways that would begin halting or even reversing
> use of 'would' since 'believe'.

(D)  a  most sure, easy, and inexpensive way beginning the halting and even reversing of
> wrong usage of 'a'.

(E)  the most sure, easiest, and inexpensive way  that would begin halting or even reversing
> not parallel among the terms.

nitya34 · Answer

https://gmatsentencecorrection.blogspot. ... chive.html

972). OA - A - some of the surest, easiest least expensive ways to begin to halt

B, E - incorrect - modifier error - "most" modifying sure, easiest, least

C - incorrect - unidiomatic - ways that - must be ways to

D - incorrect - We need definite article the instead of a
------
Many environmentalists believe that the widespread planting of trees, along with the conservation of existing forests, would be one of the surest, easiest, and least expensive ways to begin to halt or even to reverse the buildup of carbon dioxide in the air
(A) one of the surest, easiest, and least expensive ways to begin to halt or even to reverse
(B) one of the most sure, easy, and least expensive ways to begin a halt or even reverse
(C) one of the surest, easiest, and least expensive ways that would begin halting or even reversing
(D) a most sure, easy, and inexpensive way beginning the halting and even reversing of
(E) the most sure, easiest, and inexpensive way that would begin halting or even reversing

student26 · Answer

I have a doubt..how can we have "one" of the surest,easiest and least expensive ways. There will be only 1 Surest , 1 Easiest and 1 least expensive,as this is superlative for,and we cannot have one of the surest,easiest... "A" would mean we have many surest,easiest... ways.. and ONE OF THEM is best according to environmentalist. 
Pls explain.

mbaiseasy · Answer

Please see my attached answer.

JJakeRRoberts · Answer

Which is correct? One of the most sure or One of the most surest? Is superlative required after one of the most?

daagh · Answer

Apourv
I presume your question is more academic than with reference to the question at hand as 'the most surest' is not one of the choices available in this question. 'The most surest' is never correct because of using a double superlative. Even 'the most sure' is not right; 'a most sure' is bad for missing the definite article ‘the’ that has to precede a superlative. 'The surest' is correct.

DmitryFarber · Answer

student26 , superlative terms don't always have to refer to one thing. For instance, I might say that basketball players are the tallest athletes. Sure, one person in the world must be the tallest athlete of all (unless there's a tie), but we can also compare the attributes of entire groups. So if I say that basketball players are the tallest, it just means that if I compared their heights with the heights of other groups (probably using mean height), basketball players would be the highest as a group.

Similarly, I might say that meditation is one of the best ways to improve your concentration skills. That doesn't mean there's nothing better I can do, just that there are many more things I can do that are worse! It's also common to say something like "Steve Vai is one of the best guitar players in the world." We might not be able to agree on a standard by which one player could objectively be said to be the best, but we can often agree that most guitar players are much worse than Steve Vai, so this usage makes sense. If we were to enumerate the best guitar players, Steve Vai would be in that group, and most of the rest of us would not!

rnn · Answer

hi, i am still unclear after reading the post why c is incorrect...

is it wrong to have two -ing words like "halting or even reversing"

AjiteshArun · Answer

One way to take option C out is to take a meaning call. This is the sentence option C leads to: Many environmentalists believe that the widespread planting of trees, along with the conservation of existing forests, would be one of the surest, easiest, and least expensive ways that would begin halting or even reversing the buildup of carbon dioxide in the air. It's not the ways themselves that are going to do anything. The intended meaning is that we are discussing methods . This is one of the best ways that would get a good score on the GMAT . vs. This is one of the best ways to get a good score on the GMAT . We clearly don't want to imply that the ways themselves will get a good score on the GMAT.

gambit07 · Answer

GMATNinja ,

I am surprised at the inconsistencies demonstrated by GMAT.

The sentence uses would despite having a present tense ( Many people believe that -----).

In another GmatPrep question (given below), the use of the present tense was the sole reason to rule out one of the wrong answers.

"A majority of observers interviewed see the Middle East as unstable at present but  that it will, or could , become less volatile in the future."

(A) that it will, or could,
(B) that it would, or could,
(C) it will be or could
(D) believe that it will be or could
(E) think the Middle East would or could

GMATNinja · Answer

These sorts of things only seem like inconsistencies when we try to distill SC down to a concrete list of black and white rules. But because every question is unique and because the context is so important, you always have to think really hard about meaning rather than trying to memorize and apply a complicated list of made-up rules. The two questions referenced here are, of course, entirely different. In one, we have specific time markers ("at present" and "in the future"), so we need the verb tenses to fit with those times. Also, the "would" in the "environmentalists" question accurately conveys the implied conditional nature of the situation: IF the widespread planting of trees and the conservation of existing forests were actually done, then it would be one of the surest, easiest, and least expensive ways to... But in the "observers" question, we don't have a conditional situation. In fact, in choice (E), the "would" causes us to expect a condition that we never get. "A majority of observers interviewed think the Middle East would become less volatile in the future... if what?? ". So we have two entirely different situations. In one, "would" makes the most sense; in the other, "will" makes more sense. Welcome to GMAT SC!

mSKR · Answer

Hi  AjiteshArun

Please comment on correct reasons to correct D and E .
ANything i missed except points highlighted below.

Your opinion.

Thanks!

Many environmentalists believe that the widespread planting of trees, along with the conservation of existing forests, would be  one of the surest, easiest, and least expensive ways to begin to halt or even to reverse  the buildup of carbon dioxide in the air.

(D)  a  most sure, easy, and inexpensive way beginning the halting and even reversing of
a most is wrong
we are talking about specific entity  the  is preferred over  a 
-most sure, most easy and most inexpensive---i think this point is not an issue in D.( most sure, easy and inexpesnive -correct; no issue with this, right?)
-  to begin  is prefeered over  beginning  but not necessarily wrong
please comment

(E)  the  most sure, easiest, and inexpensive  way that would  begin halting or even reversing
can we reject E ?
- change in meaning ( from  one of the  to  the most )
- way that would xx --change in meaning

AjiteshArun · Answer

Hi  mSKR ,

Most  should make sense with the elements in the list.

1.  the most sure, easiest, and inexpensive way   ~   the most sure ,   the most easiest  ,  the most inexpensive ...

Pankaj0901 · Answer

Why is Option C wrong? I could not find any explanations in the thread except that the infinitive as in the Option A, correct answer, is needed.

MartyTargetTestPrep · Answer

Here's choice (C).

(C) one of the surest, easiest, and least expensive  ways that would begin halting or even reversing

Notice that the (C) version conveys that "ways" themselves "would begin halting or even reversing the buildup of carbon dioxide in the air."

This meaning is nonsensical because ways do not engage in actions, such as halting or reversing.

Rather, someone or something would engage in the action of halting or reversing by USING the ways TO halt and reverse the buildup of carbon dioxide in the air.

Naveengkp022 · Answer

Hello Sir,
Can you please explain the use of "would" in this sentence?

As per my understanding, "would" is used only when 
- someone in the past speaks about their future
- Second conditional- unlikely If-then statements

Here both these conditions are not there.

Many environmentalists believe that the widespread planting of trees,

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

Many environmentalists believe that the widespread planting of trees,

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards