Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 05:11 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 05:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
SwethaReddyL
Joined: 28 Nov 2023
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 266
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 106
Kudos: 26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Reon
Joined: 16 Sep 2025
Last visit: 28 Mar 2026
Posts: 134
Own Kudos:
121
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 134
Kudos: 121
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chasing725
Joined: 22 Jun 2025
Last visit: 13 Jan 2026
Posts: 176
Own Kudos:
173
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: United States (OR)
Schools: Stanford
Schools: Stanford
Posts: 176
Kudos: 173
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
redandme21
Joined: 14 Dec 2025
Last visit: 05 Jan 2026
Posts: 97
Own Kudos:
87
 [1]
Posts: 97
Kudos: 87
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: Haraza archive was most likely produced by scribes who came to Haraza from outside the region.

A Goods traded in common. It's irrelevant to scribe location.

B More training in port cities. It's irrelevant to whether scribes moved to Haraza.

C Preference for local writing customs. That would strengthen possibility of outside scribes if customs are outside, but not essential assumption.

D The argument is about inference from writing style. The absence of explicit identification isn't assumed.

E Correct. This is exactly the needed assumption. If this is false (records written elsewhere and brought to Haraza), conclusion falls apart.


IMO E
User avatar
Natansha
Joined: 13 Jun 2019
Last visit: 11 Mar 2026
Posts: 195
Own Kudos:
65
 [1]
Given Kudos: 84
Posts: 195
Kudos: 65
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Author's conclusion is that the Haraza archive was written by scribes who came from outside.

A) doesn't matter if the goods were traded or not through the distant port cities, the conclusion still stands if we negate and say goods were not traded through distant port cities.
B) Irrelevant, who has more training doesnt matter here
C) this will slightly strengthen the conclusion by saying that local writing customs were followed, hence those archives were written by outsiders who came, but if we negate it, they didn't prefer to preserve local writing customs, still it could be written by scribes came from outside or could have been brought here, doesn't break the conclusion.
D)their training location doesnt matter, Irrelevant

E) Negating this, the archives were not written in Haraza, but brought in from somewhere else, this breaks the conclusion that it was written by scribes who came to Haraza

Ans E
User avatar
adityaprateek15
Joined: 26 May 2023
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 346
Own Kudos:
170
 [1]
Given Kudos: 323
Location: India
GPA: 2.7
Products:
Posts: 346
Kudos: 170
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise 1: Shorthand was neither taught nor used in Haraza's region
Premise 2: Haraza records have the same abbreviations and patterns as those found in other cities.
Conclusion: Haraza archive was produced by scribes who came to Haraza from outside

What if the archive was produced in the same region the scribe belonged to? This will destroy the conclusion. This is the necessary assumption.

A. This doesn't break the conclusion. The argument is about the writing style of the tax records and not about the goods being taxed.
B. This is irrelevant. The argument is about where the scribes learned the shorthand skill not their overall level of training compared to others.
C. This choice talks about the preference of the government. It doesn't break the conclusion.
D. This choice also strengthens the premise, but it is not the assumption we need.
E. This perfectly matches the pre-thought assumption we had.

Choice E

Bunuel
In a recently excavated administrative archive unearthed beneath Haraza’s main city complex, researchers found dozens of tax records written in a highly specialized legal shorthand. Linguists note that during the period when the archive was produced, this shorthand was neither taught nor used in Haraza’s region, though it was common in several distant port cities. Further, the Haraza records employ the same abbreviations and sentence patterns found in tax records from those port cities. The researchers therefore conclude that the Haraza archive was most likely produced by scribes who came to Haraza from outside the region.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Some of the goods listed in the Haraza tax records were also traded through the distant port cities.
(B) The port cities’ tax systems were administered by officials who had more training than Haraza’s officials did.
(C) Haraza’s local government typically preferred to preserve local writing customs in official records.
(D) The Haraza archive contains no explicit statement identifying where the scribes were trained.
(E) The Haraza tax records were written in Haraza rather than brought in from elsewhere.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
User avatar
geocircle
Joined: 14 Dec 2025
Last visit: 27 Dec 2025
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
87
 [1]
Posts: 90
Kudos: 87
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A Irrelevant. Shared goods do not explain shared shorthand.

B Irrelevant Relative training levels are not used in the reasoning.

C Not required. The argument does not depend on Haraza's usual preferences.

D Irrelevant. The argument does not rely on explicit statements about training.

E Right answer. The conclusion only works if the records were written in Haraza rather than brought in from elsewhere.


Answer E
User avatar
gemministorm
Joined: 26 May 2025
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 143
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
GMAT Focus 1: 565 Q82 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 605 Q84 V83 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 605 Q84 V83 DI73
Posts: 143
Kudos: 110
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: The archive was most likely produced by scribes from outside Haraza.
Why? archive written in shorthand not taught locally, but common in distant port cities.

A, B, D are not relevant w.r.t conclusion.
C and E are relevant
Negating C -> Haraza's local govt. do not prefer to preserve local writing customs in official records - still without preference also the local writing's could have been preserved hence our argument does not get affected.
Negating E-> records were not written in Haraza rather brought in from elsewhere -> hence breaks our argument. [P.S I am assuming produced in argument means written/created] -> hence E
User avatar
sanjitscorps18
Joined: 26 Jan 2019
Last visit: 03 Mar 2026
Posts: 723
Own Kudos:
740
 [1]
Given Kudos: 130
Location: India
Schools: IMD'26
Products:
Schools: IMD'26
Posts: 723
Kudos: 740
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A -> This is not required for the argument to stand
B -> This still does not help explain why the records had similar type of writings. Rather it should have been different.
C -> Goes against the argument
D -> Scribe training is not required as an assumption here
E -> This has to be true. They must be assuming the records were written here, and the scribes were brought in. Else if the records were brought in you may not need the scribes to be in Hazra.

Option E
Bunuel
In a recently excavated administrative archive unearthed beneath Haraza’s main city complex, researchers found dozens of tax records written in a highly specialized legal shorthand. Linguists note that during the period when the archive was produced, this shorthand was neither taught nor used in Haraza’s region, though it was common in several distant port cities. Further, the Haraza records employ the same abbreviations and sentence patterns found in tax records from those port cities. The researchers therefore conclude that the Haraza archive was most likely produced by scribes who came to Haraza from outside the region.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Some of the goods listed in the Haraza tax records were also traded through the distant port cities.
(B) The port cities’ tax systems were administered by officials who had more training than Haraza’s officials did.
(C) Haraza’s local government typically preferred to preserve local writing customs in official records.
(D) The Haraza archive contains no explicit statement identifying where the scribes were trained.
(E) The Haraza tax records were written in Haraza rather than brought in from elsewhere.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
User avatar
kapoora10
Joined: 13 Jul 2024
Last visit: 12 Apr 2026
Posts: 109
Own Kudos:
95
 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Location: India
Concentration: Real Estate, Sustainability
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q88 V74 DI84
GMAT Focus 2: 655 Q85 V83 DI80
GPA: 8.03
WE:Corporate Finance (Finance: Investment Management)
Products:
GMAT Focus 2: 655 Q85 V83 DI80
Posts: 109
Kudos: 95
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let's check each statement one by one:
A=> Shared goods are irrelevant to who wrote the records. Eliminate.
B=> Relative training levels don't matter to the logic. Eliminate.
C=> Local preference for writing customs would strengthen the argument but it is not required. Eliminate.
D=> Lack of an explicit statement is irrelevant. Eliminate.
E=> The argument depends upon the fact that the records were written locally, if not, the base of the argument is questioned, that they could be transported from somewhere. Correct.

Answer => E
User avatar
topgmat25
Joined: 15 Dec 2025
Last visit: 05 Jan 2026
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
87
 [1]
Posts: 90
Kudos: 87
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A This talks about trade, not writing practices. Goods being common to both places does not explain why the same shorthand appears. Not required.

B The argument never compares skill or training levels. Not assumed.

C Even if this were false, the argument could still stand. The researchers only need to know that the shorthand was not locally taught or used.

D The argument does not rely on the absence of a statement. It relies on linguistic patterns.

E If this were not true, the conclusion would fail. The records could have been written in a port city and later transported. Correct answer.


The answer is E
User avatar
Rahilgaur
Joined: 24 Jun 2024
Last visit: 26 Jan 2026
Posts: 162
Own Kudos:
125
 [1]
Given Kudos: 47
GMAT Focus 1: 575 Q81 V82 DI72
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 575 Q81 V82 DI72
Posts: 162
Kudos: 125
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In a recently excavated administrative archive unearthed beneath Haraza’s main city complex, researchers found dozens of tax records written in a highly specialized legal shorthand. Linguists note that during the period when the archive was produced, this shorthand was neither taught nor used in Haraza’s region, though it was common in several distant port cities. Further, the Haraza records employ the same abbreviations and sentence patterns found in tax records from those port cities. The researchers therefore conclude that the Haraza archive was most likely produced by scribes who came to Haraza from outside the region.

Concluded - Some must have came from other cities to write the scribes in hazara. Pre-thinking - possibilities - 1. people from hazara went to other cities to learn and got back and wrote the scribes. 2. Documents could have been written in some other cities.


Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Some of the goods listed in the Haraza tax records were also traded through the distant port cities. - Not relevant to the conclusion
(B) The port cities’ tax systems were administered by officials who had more training than Haraza’s officials did. - Again not relevant
(C) Haraza’s local government typically preferred to preserve local writing customs in official records. - this is not the conflict at hand
(D) The Haraza archive contains no explicit statement identifying where the scribes were trained. - Even if the it is mentioned it would have been possible that it was written by Hazara people.
(E) The Haraza tax records were written in Haraza rather than brought in from elsewhere. - Exactly! if the records were brought from somewhere it will break the conclusion that scribes were produced by someone who came from outside (Answer)
User avatar
Vaishbab
Joined: 29 Jan 2023
Last visit: 08 Mar 2026
Posts: 115
Own Kudos:
51
 [1]
Given Kudos: 81
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Operations
Posts: 115
Kudos: 51
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The stem states that the tax records show influences from nearby port cities ---> that means that the archive was produced by scribes who came to Haraza from outside the region

The assumption should reinforce this relation.

(A) This isn't relevant. We are talking about the writing practice, not trade goods. ELIMINATED

(B) I don't see how this has anything to do with where the scribes were from. ELIMINATED

(C) Again, this does not affect what the conclusion states. Sure, local writing customs were preserved but it has no effect on where the scribes were from. ELIMINATED

(D) Nothing in this reasoning requires the archive to lack an explicit statement about training. Even if it were true, it isn't explicitly clear what kind of effect the training would have on the writing style. ELIMINATED

(E) If we negate this statement, the argument falls apart. If the records were bright in from elsewhere, this argument would become void.

Hence (E) is the answer.
User avatar
firefox300
Joined: 15 Dec 2025
Last visit: 27 Dec 2025
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
87
 [1]
Posts: 90
Kudos: 87
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A Not an assumption: even if no goods were traded in common, scribes could still be from port cities.

B Not an assumption: training superiority has no logical connection to whether scribes moved from port cities to Haraza.

C No need to assume local preference for the argument to work.

D Not an assumption: even if there were a statement, it wouldn't necessarily undermine the argument.

E CORRECT. It's the assumption: if the records were written in port cities and brought to Haraza, scribes didn't come to Haraza.


The correct answer is E
User avatar
Nitish03
Joined: 02 Feb 2025
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 28
Location: India
Posts: 46
Kudos: 20
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Some of the goods listed in the Haraza tax records were also traded through the distant port cities. - it doesn't explain scribal origin
(B) The port cities’ tax systems were administered by officials who had more training than Haraza’s officials did. - training of officials is irrelevant here.
(C) Haraza’s local government typically preferred to preserve local writing customs in official records. - this is contradictory as local preference are not needed as shorthand was not from hazard.
(D) The Haraza archive contains no explicit statement identifying where the scribes were trained. - Relevant
(E) The Haraza tax records were written in Haraza rather than brought in from elsewhere. - This is the required assumption as conclusion clearly states that shorthand was produced by scribes who came to hazard from outside. Unless records were written in hazard conclusion won't make sense.
User avatar
Gmat860sanskar
Joined: 05 May 2023
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 210
Own Kudos:
111
 [1]
Given Kudos: 78
Schools: ISB '26
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q82 V78 DI80
Products:
Schools: ISB '26
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q82 V78 DI80
Posts: 210
Kudos: 111
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
In a recently excavated administrative archive unearthed beneath Haraza’s main city complex, researchers found dozens of tax records written in a highly specialized legal shorthand. Linguists note that during the period when the archive was produced, this shorthand was neither taught nor used in Haraza’s region, though it was common in several distant port cities. Further, the Haraza records employ the same abbreviations and sentence patterns found in tax records from those port cities. The researchers therefore conclude that the Haraza archive was most likely produced by scribes who came to Haraza from outside the region.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) Some of the goods listed in the Haraza tax records were also traded through the distant port cities.
(B) The port cities’ tax systems were administered by officials who had more training than Haraza’s officials did.
(C) Haraza’s local government typically preferred to preserve local writing customs in official records.
(D) The Haraza archive contains no explicit statement identifying where the scribes were trained.
(E) The Haraza tax records were written in Haraza rather than brought in from elsewhere.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
Premise : Tax records found used a specialised shorthand common in distant port but not in Haraza; The record use same abbreviation as distant port cities
Conclusion : Hazara archives were produced by scribes who came to Haraza

So to bridge the gap we need assumption :

That records are written here rather than anywhere else

E option exactly does that

So our answer is E
User avatar
asperioresfacere
Joined: 03 Nov 2025
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 106
Posts: 61
Kudos: 53
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Evidence : The shorthand used in Haraza was not taught or used there but was common in distant port cities.
Conclusion : The Haraza archive was produced by scribes who came to Haraza from outside the region.
Assumption : The argument assumes the records were actually written in Haraza. If the records were just physical documents brought from port cities to Haraza , we wouldn't need scribes to move ; only the papers moved.

A : It doesn't matter what goods were traded ; It's about who wrote the records.❌
B: The Argument is not about who was better at their job or more highly trained , It's about where the scribes came from .❌
C : If the govt preferred local customs , then finding foreign shorthand in their archive is even more confusing.❌
D : Fact about the evidence rather than a logical connection.This just describes what is not in the text .❌
E : If we negate this option , If they were brought in from elsewhere , the foreign shorthand only proves , they were written by foreigners at the port , not that these foreigners even stepped foot in Haraza. The argument falls apart ✅
User avatar
Mardee
Joined: 22 Nov 2022
Last visit: 02 Feb 2026
Posts: 225
Own Kudos:
191
 [1]
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 225
Kudos: 191
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. Irrelevant as it doesent matter goods are traded in port cities, since its not required to who wrote the records
B. Irrelevant as the training level of the city officials is not required for the origin of scribes
C. Not as irrelevant as the locals preference for preserving their writing customs doesent enforce the scribes to be local or foreign in particular
D. Irrelevant as the argument isnt dependent on this fact of where training was done and requires a logical necessity here.
E. Relevant as if this is negated for instance here, the argument would fall apart since the foreign shorthand could be explained without foreign scribes and the conclusion for the scribe migration would not be supported. Thus this is seen to be a required assumption here

E.
User avatar
sriharsha4444
Joined: 06 Jun 2018
Last visit: 05 Mar 2026
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
84
 [1]
Given Kudos: 803
Posts: 125
Kudos: 84
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
conclusion: haraza archive most likely produced by the scribes who came from outside

premise: because those records were found there + those abbreviations are neither taught nor used in Haraza


Gap:
what if those records were brought in (for some reason), then scribes need not come there

A.whether the goods of haraza are traded in distant city or not, the conclusion stands where it is. Because that is not needed for scribes to come from outside.
B. More training ? Not needed for conclusion to flow.
C.Then why did Haraza have non local writings ? Doesn't support or oppose the conclusion
D. Let's say it did have where they were trained. That doesn't break the argument that they could have come from outside.
E. Correct. This must be true else, it is possible that records could have been transported and in that case, the guess that most likely scribes have come here will fall apart.
User avatar
chasing725
Joined: 22 Jun 2025
Last visit: 13 Jan 2026
Posts: 176
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: United States (OR)
Schools: Stanford
Schools: Stanford
Posts: 176
Kudos: 173
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chasing725


The last line is the conclusion of the argument. It tells us that the scribes came to Haraza, so the author assumes that the documents were produced in Haraza.

A) Incorrect : Irrelevant to the conclusion.

B) Incorrect: We are concerned about tax records which are written in Haraza and not in port citities.

C) Incorrect: Out of scope to the concusion.

D) Incorrect : Irrelevant to the conclusion

E) COrrect: If we negate this, the argument breaks. If the documents itself were transported, the scribes need nto have come to Hazara.

Option E
miag bb - Wanted to check if I missed anything in the explanation. I wasn't awared kudos. It is good to know so that I can take care of this.
   1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts