Last visit was: 08 Jul 2025, 21:05 It is currently 08 Jul 2025, 21:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,594
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 97,452
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,594
Kudos: 739,593
 [18]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
16
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,594
Own Kudos:
739,593
 [2]
Given Kudos: 97,452
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,594
Kudos: 739,593
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
missionmba2025
Joined: 07 May 2023
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 328
Own Kudos:
387
 [1]
Given Kudos: 50
Location: India
Posts: 328
Kudos: 387
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Mentis678
Joined: 05 Mar 2023
Last visit: 16 Apr 2025
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 59
Location: India
Schools: Booth '26
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.2
Products:
Schools: Booth '26
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Posts: 125
Kudos: 60
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
12 Days of Christmas 🎅 GMAT Competition with Lots of Questions & Fun

In the realm of software development, it has been observed that certain programming languages become predominant in specific industries. For instance, language A is widely used in the finance sector, while language B is more prevalent in the tech startup community. Experts in software engineering suggest that this pattern is not a mere coincidence but a result of targeted marketing by the companies that developed these languages. They argue that these companies have strategically influenced the adoption of their programming languages within different industries.

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the experts' hypothesis?

(A) Whether the inherent features of language A are particularly suited to applications commonly used in finance, and similarly for language B in tech startups.

(B) Whether there has been a historical precedent of programming languages becoming popular in specific industries due to targeted marketing efforts.

(C) Whether companies in the finance sector and tech startup community have reported higher efficiency and productivity after adopting languages A and B, respectively.

(D) Whether the developers of languages A and B have engaged in partnerships or sponsorships with leading companies in their targeted industries.

(E) Whether new programming languages, with capabilities similar to languages A and B, have emerged and been adopted in other industries.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 


Option A is correct.

(A) Whether the inherent features of language A are particularly suited to applications commonly used in finance, and similarly for language B in tech startups.
This gives us an alternate reason for the adoption of languages hence questions the conclusion.

(B) Whether there has been a historical precedent of programming languages becoming popular in specific industries due to targeted marketing efforts.
We can't say whether what happened in some point in history will happen again.

(C) Whether companies in the finance sector and tech startup community have reported higher efficiency and productivity after adopting languages A and B, respectively.
The usefullness of the languages is not in question here. This is irrelevant.

(D) Whether the developers of languages A and B have engaged in partnerships or sponsorships with leading companies in their targeted industries.
There is not proof that this ended up influencing other players.

(E) Whether new programming languages, with capabilities similar to languages A and B, have emerged and been adopted in other industries.
Irrelevant.
avatar
DG1989
Joined: 16 Feb 2023
Last visit: 24 Dec 2024
Posts: 140
Own Kudos:
282
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
Schools: Kellogg '26
GPA: 4
Schools: Kellogg '26
Posts: 140
Kudos: 282
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In the realm of software development, it has been observed that certain programming languages become predominant in specific industries. For instance, language A is widely used in the finance sector, while language B is more prevalent in the tech startup community. Experts in software engineering suggest that this pattern is not a mere coincidence but a result of targeted marketing by the companies that developed these languages. They argue that these companies have strategically influenced the adoption of their programming languages within different industries.

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the experts' hypothesis?

(A) Whether the inherent features of language A are particularly suited to applications commonly used in finance, and similarly for language B in tech startups.

(B) Whether there has been a historical precedent of programming languages becoming popular in specific industries due to targeted marketing efforts.

(C) Whether companies in the finance sector and tech startup community have reported higher efficiency and productivity after adopting languages A and B, respectively.

(D) Whether the developers of languages A and B have engaged in partnerships or sponsorships with leading companies in their targeted industries.

(E) Whether new programming languages, with capabilities similar to languages A and B, have emerged and been adopted in other industries.


Solution:

(A) Whether the inherent features of language A are particularly suited to applications commonly used in finance, and similarly for language B in tech startups.
Explanation: Even though the inherent features of the languages can be considered an important metric for their adoption by the different companies, this doesn't help in evaluating the expert's hypothesis that the developer companies of these languages used targeted marketing to influence the adoption of the said languages. Even if the inherent features may not suit the applications common to finance or tech startups, still those companies can end up adopting them anyways NOT CORRECT


(B) Whether there has been a historical precedent of programming languages becoming popular in specific industries due to targeted marketing efforts.
Explanation:This option doesn't help in evaluating whether the companies influenced the adoption of the languages they developed as the historical precedent doesn't always guarantee the replication of results. NOT CORRECT


(C) Whether companies in the finance sector and tech startup community have reported higher efficiency and productivity after adopting languages A and B, respectively.
Explanation:Whether the efficiency and productivity increased or decreased doesn't translate to a targeted marketing strategy or the influential techniques of the developer companies. Hence this is irrelevant to the argument. NOT CORRECT


(D) Whether the developers of languages A and B have engaged in partnerships or sponsorships with leading companies in their targeted industries.
Explanation: This option helps evaluating the expert's hypothesis in that if the developers of the languages were engaged in partnerships or sponsorships with the leading companies then this can cause the adoption of these languages by those industries as a part of goodwill and liaison. Hence the hypothesis is strengthened. On the other hand, if this is not true then the hypothesis will be weakened. CORRECT


(E) Whether new programming languages, with capabilities similar to languages A and B, have emerged and been adopted in other industries.
Explanation:This option doesn't help in evaluating the hypothesis because if this is true, then the industries may or may not adopt the languages A and B. This choice doesn't provide a strong evidence for strengthening or weakening the hypothesis. NOT CORRECT


Hence Option D is the correct choice.
User avatar
Mentis678
Joined: 05 Mar 2023
Last visit: 16 Apr 2025
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 59
Location: India
Schools: Booth '26
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 3.2
Products:
Schools: Booth '26
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Posts: 125
Kudos: 60
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
12 Days of Christmas 🎅 GMAT Competition with Lots of Questions & Fun

In the realm of software development, it has been observed that certain programming languages become predominant in specific industries. For instance, language A is widely used in the finance sector, while language B is more prevalent in the tech startup community. Experts in software engineering suggest that this pattern is not a mere coincidence but a result of targeted marketing by the companies that developed these languages. They argue that these companies have strategically influenced the adoption of their programming languages within different industries.

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the experts' hypothesis?

(A) Whether the inherent features of language A are particularly suited to applications commonly used in finance, and similarly for language B in tech startups.

(B) Whether there has been a historical precedent of programming languages becoming popular in specific industries due to targeted marketing efforts.

(C) Whether companies in the finance sector and tech startup community have reported higher efficiency and productivity after adopting languages A and B, respectively.

(D) Whether the developers of languages A and B have engaged in partnerships or sponsorships with leading companies in their targeted industries.

(E) Whether new programming languages, with capabilities similar to languages A and B, have emerged and been adopted in other industries.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the 12 Days of Christmas Competition

Win $40,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 


GMAT experts: mcelroytutoring , AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , mikemcgarry , egmat , RonPurewal , DmitryFarber , MagooshExpert , ccooley, MartyTargetTestPrep, ScottTargetTestPrep , other experts-- please help.
I think the choice A is better as it offers a possible alternatives of why certain languages are gaining more traction. Please enlighten.
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 2,945
Own Kudos:
8,382
 [4]
Given Kudos: 57
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 2,945
Kudos: 8,382
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mentis678

Hmm, I think this one needs some work. D is a reasonable enough answer, but the explanation says that B is "not as good as D." That's not how CR is supposed to work. One answer should fit the question, and the other four should not. I know the prompts say "most useful," but that's just a hedge. There should not be two usable answers, and here there are really three!

That leads me to A. When the author makes a causal conclusion, they are assuming that no other cause would completely explain the effect in question. A correct answer to an evaluate question can definitely address this assumption. There's no need for the answer to address the cause preferred by the author. Similarly, if you thought someone was sick from drinking too much, you might want to know if they had a virus. Sure, the cause could be both, but alternative causes are still relevant.

In short, you can make a pretty solid case for A and B, in addition to the official answer of D. An official GMAT CR might *feel* that way, but it won't actually *be* that way. All the wrong answers will really be wrong in some way.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,439
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,439
Kudos: 952
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts