Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 17:34 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 17:34
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
705-805 Level|   Weaken|         
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,072
 [11]
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,072
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,072
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Lizaza
Joined: 16 Jan 2021
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 165
Own Kudos:
219
 [2]
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V40
Posts: 165
Kudos: 219
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,170
Own Kudos:
10,413
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,861
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Posts: 3,170
Kudos: 10,413
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion: Lowering the staffing by 250 employees would not decrease the service.

A. He confuses the definitions of absent and unemployed.

Out of scope : This doesn't throw light on the conclusion.

B. He fails to justify an assumed change in absenteeism.

I think this the best option. Lets say after the staff is lowered the number of absentees increase. The delivery rates may get affected.

C. He takes for granted that every employee’s level of service is identical.

Distortion : I think this is pretty close. However, even if the service level is not identical the employees are still maintaining on-time delivery rates. Also, we how the lowering of staff would be done is not given. May be the employees with bad service record be let go.

D. He overlooks the fact that some absences are more justified than are others.

Out of scope : This doesn't throw light on the conclusion.

E. He ignores the possibility that absences may be unevenly distributed at the company.

Out of scope : How the layoff would be done is not mentioned, hence we cannot conclude that it would be a homogeneous decrease across facilities.

After a lot of thought between B & C ...

IMO - B
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,835
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,835
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts