Hi inciduntveniam,Great question, because this is exactly the kind of recognition that comes from spotting a
pattern type, not from the numbers themselves.
Look at what the posted solutions (Kurtosis, Abhishek) jumped to: LCM. Here's the reasoning they skipped over.
Why LCM is the toolThink about
one bell at a time. The bell with a
7-second period tolls at
7,
14,
21,
28 ... seconds - i.e. at every
multiple of 7. The
8-second bell tolls at every multiple of
8. And so on.
Now ask: at what moment do
all four toll at once again? It has to be a time that is
simultaneously a multiple of
7, of
8, of
11, and of
12 - in other words, a
common multiple of all four periods.
There are infinitely many common multiples, but the
first time they re-coincide is the
smallest one. "Smallest common multiple of several numbers" is literally the definition of
LCM. That's the whole link.
The trigger to memorizeWhenever several things repeat on their own fixed cycles and you're asked
when they next line up together, that's an
LCM situation - bells tolling, lights blinking, runners meeting at a start line, gears returning to position. (The mirror-image cue - "largest size that divides several quantities evenly" - points to
GCD instead.)
Lock it in with a tiny versionForget the ugly numbers. Suppose two bells toll every
2 and
3 seconds:
- 2-bell:
2,
4,
6,
8,
10,
12 ...
- 3-bell:
3,
6,
9,
12 ...
List them by hand and you'll
see them first meet at
6 seconds - which is exactly LCM(
2,
3). Once you feel why
6 is the answer here, the
1848 in the original is the same idea, just with bigger numbers.
So the skill to build isn't computing LCM - it's recognizing "independent cycles, when do they coincide?" - LCM.
Answer: Cinciduntveniam
How did you guys figure out that the LCM needs to be taken out here? Like when I read the question, this did not cross my mind. How do i improve this ?