Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
16 Dec 2025, 11:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hello, I was wondering whether scoring 625 on the GMAT Focus with 5 errors in Quant (score 79), 5 errors in Verbal (score 82), and 4 errors in Data Insights (score 82) is not a bit weird.
I had seen information before and taken multiple GMAT Club tests where 8 errors in Data Insights could still give an 82, and similarly in Quant, around 4 errors could sometimes result in an 82.
So I was wondering whether this is just how the algorithm works, or if there might be something unusual, because I had this scoring pattern in mind and was quite surprised when I received my official results.
Thank you for your response, and sorry for the disturbance.
GMAT-Club-Forum-o4elqw7k.png [ 558.52 KiB | Viewed 402 times ]
I had seen information before and taken multiple GMAT Club tests where 8 errors in Data Insights could still give an 82, and similarly in Quant, around 4 errors could sometimes result in an 82.
So I was wondering whether this is just how the algorithm works, or if there might be something unusual, because I had this scoring pattern in mind and was quite surprised when I received my official results.
Thank you for your response, and sorry for the disturbance.
Attachment:
GMAT-Club-Forum-o4elqw7k.png [ 558.52 KiB | Viewed 402 times ]
16 Dec 2025, 19:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
It sometimes is unjust and it is what it is
16 Dec 2025, 21:47
Kudos
Bookmarks
Those are just rules of thumb, imo.
Your sectional scores depends on multiple factors, such as the difficulty level of the questions you got wrong, position(s) of your wrong answers, and whether you have made revision to your answers, etc.
Also, Quant scoring is more unforgiving, while Verbal and DI scoring is more forgiving.
Have you tried any official mock tests? When it comes to scoring and algorithm, the official mocks are your best guidance.
Your sectional scores depends on multiple factors, such as the difficulty level of the questions you got wrong, position(s) of your wrong answers, and whether you have made revision to your answers, etc.
Also, Quant scoring is more unforgiving, while Verbal and DI scoring is more forgiving.
Have you tried any official mock tests? When it comes to scoring and algorithm, the official mocks are your best guidance.
autunde
