Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 16:16 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 16:16
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
bmwhype2
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Last visit: 08 Mar 2010
Posts: 1,338
Own Kudos:
5,435
 [89]
Given Kudos: 4
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,338
Kudos: 5,435
 [89]
10
Kudos
Add Kudos
79
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
eschn3am
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Last visit: 03 Apr 2017
Posts: 396
Own Kudos:
582
 [19]
Posts: 396
Kudos: 582
 [19]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
maratikus
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Last visit: 22 Jul 2010
Posts: 257
Own Kudos:
342
 [15]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 257
Kudos: 342
 [15]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
eschn3am
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Last visit: 03 Apr 2017
Posts: 396
Own Kudos:
582
 [9]
Posts: 396
Kudos: 582
 [9]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
walker
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Last visit: 25 May 2025
Posts: 2,398
Own Kudos:
10,717
 [11]
Given Kudos: 362
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Posts: 2,398
Kudos: 10,717
 [11]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
another ways:

1. \(p=\frac{C^9_2-C^2_1}{C^9_2}=1-\frac{2}{36}=\frac{17}{18}\)

or

2. \(p=\frac{P^9_2-P^2_1*P^2_2}{P^9_2}=1-\frac{4}{72}=\frac{17}{18}\)

or

3. \(p=\frac49*\frac78+\frac59*\frac88=\frac{68}{72}=\frac{17}{18}\)

probability questions always have a few ways :boxer2 :ninja :m16

bmwhype2, thanks for your question
+1
User avatar
x2suresh
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Last visit: 18 Aug 2012
Posts: 715
Own Kudos:
3,139
 [3]
Given Kudos: 5
Location: New York
Posts: 715
Kudos: 3,139
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bmwhype2
There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of siblings within that group. If we choose two people, what is the probability that they will not be siblings?

= 1- (2C2*2/9C2) = 1-1/18 = 17/18
avatar
sanjay_gmat
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Last visit: 05 Apr 2009
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
91
 [8]
Posts: 119
Kudos: 91
 [8]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
x2suresh
bmwhype2
There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of siblings within that group. If we choose two people, what is the probability that they will not be siblings?

= 1- (2C2*2/9C2) = 1-1/18 = 17/18

Method 1 : total number of ways of choosing 2 people out of 9 = 9C2 = 36

probability of choosing two people so that they are siblings = 2C1 = 2 { since there are two pairs of siblings }

required probability = (36 -2) /36 = 17/18.

Method 2 : total number of ways = 36

let say the nine people that we have are A, B, C, D, E, S11, S12, S21, S22 where (S11, S12) and (S21, S22) are sibling pairs.

number of ways one can choose two people is :

choose 2 from A, B, C, D, E . Number of ways = 5C2 = 10.

choose 1 from A, B, C, D, E AND 1 from (S11, S12, S21, S22) in 5*4 = 20 ways

choose 1 from (S11, S12) and 1 from (S21, S22) in 4 ways .

total number of ways = 34

probability = 34/36 = 17/18
avatar
srivas
Joined: 27 Oct 2008
Last visit: 28 Sep 2009
Posts: 95
Own Kudos:
310
 [3]
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 95
Kudos: 310
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of siblings within that group. If we choose two people, what is the probability that they will not be siblings?

Soln: probability that they will not be siblings
= 1 - Probability that they will be siblings
= 1 - (4/9 * 1/8)
= 1 - (1/18)
= 17/18
User avatar
dkj1984
Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Last visit: 31 Jul 2011
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
19
 [1]
Posts: 19
Kudos: 19
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Walker,

With reference to your solution for the married couples problem where in we have to select 4 people out of 6 couples such that none is married to each other,can this problem be tackled in the same way?


How will we arrive at the solution?

Thanks!

regards,
User avatar
walker
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Last visit: 25 May 2025
Posts: 2,398
Own Kudos:
10,717
 [6]
Given Kudos: 362
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2011
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V40
Posts: 2,398
Kudos: 10,717
 [6]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You can use the same approach but it's important to note that not all people have siblings.

\(C^5_2\) - the number of options to choose 2 people out of 5 people without siblings
\(C^5_1*C^2_1*C^2_1\) - the number of options to choose 1 person out of 5 without siblings, choose 1 pair of siblings out of 2, choose 1 person out of the pair.
\(C^2_1*C^2_1\) - the number of options to choose 1 person out of 2 for each pair of siblings.

\(p = \frac{C^5_2+C^5_1*C^2_1*C^2_1+C^2_1*C^2_1}{C^9_2} = \frac{10+20+4}{36} = \frac{34}{36} = \frac{17}{18}\)
User avatar
Maxirosario2012
Joined: 02 Apr 2012
Last visit: 11 Nov 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
181
 [1]
Given Kudos: 155
Location: United States (VA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My approach :idea: : 1- p(1 minus the probability that the people we pick will be siblings)
We have 9 people:

A1 - A2 - B1 - B2 - C - D - E - F - G

Probability of picking siblings:
If we first pick A1, Probability of picking A1 \(p=\frac{1}{9}\frac\) (we pick 1 between 9)

Then, probability of picking the sibling of A1, A2, after having picked A1: \(p=\frac{1}{8}\frac\) (we pick 1 between the remainder 8 people) * \(\frac{1}{9}\frac\) (conditional probability of picking A2 after having picked A1) = \(\frac{1}{72}\frac\)

But, in addition, we could have picked A2 and then A1. Then: \(p=\frac{1}{72}\frac\) *2 = \(\frac{2}{72}\frac\) = \(\frac{1}{36}\frac\)

The same if we picked first B1 and secondly B2 or ("or" means "+") if we first picked B2 and secondly B1. Then, the total probability of picking siblings is: \(p=\frac{1}{36}\frac\) * 2 = \(\frac{2}{36}\frac\) = \(\frac{1}{18}\frac\)

Then, 1 - p = \(\frac{18}{18}\frac\) - \(\frac{1}{18}\frac\) = \(\frac{17}{18}\frac\)

Is right this logic? I am understanding the problem correctly :?:
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,368
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Maxirosario2012
My approach :idea: : 1- p(1 minus the probability that the people we pick will be siblings)
We have 9 people:

A1 - A2 - B1 - B2 - C - D - E - F - G

Probability of picking siblings:
If we first pick A1, Probability of picking A1 \(p=\frac{1}{9}\frac\) (we pick 1 between 9)

Then, probability of picking the sibling of A1, A2, after having picked A1: \(p=\frac{1}{8}\frac\) (we pick 1 between the remainder 8 people) * \(\frac{1}{9}\frac\) (conditional probability of picking A2 after having picked A1) = \(\frac{1}{72}\frac\)

But, in addition, we could have picked A2 and then A1. Then: \(p=\frac{1}{72}\frac\) *2 = \(\frac{2}{72}\frac\) = \(\frac{1}{36}\frac\)

The same if we picked first B1 and secondly B2 or ("or" means "+") if we first picked B2 and secondly B1. Then, the total probability of picking siblings is: \(p=\frac{1}{36}\frac\) * 2 = \(\frac{2}{36}\frac\) = \(\frac{1}{18}\frac\)

Then, 1 - p = \(\frac{18}{18}\frac\) - \(\frac{1}{18}\frac\) = \(\frac{17}{18}\frac\)

Is right this logic? I am understanding the problem correctly :?:

Absolutely, though not the most elegant way of solving.
User avatar
Maxirosario2012
Joined: 02 Apr 2012
Last visit: 11 Nov 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
181
 [2]
Given Kudos: 155
Location: United States (VA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of siblings within that group. If we choose two people, what is the probability that they will not be siblings?
The reversal probability approach is the most efficient way to solve. But I explore the other methods just for practice. Tell me your opinions, I have a little doubt on the reversal combinatorial approach.

Probability approach:

XXXXXAABB

\(P= \frac{6}{9} * \frac{1}{2}*2 +\frac{5}{9}*\frac{4}{8} = \frac{12}{18} + \frac{5}{18} = \frac{17}{18}\)

\(\frac{6}{9}*\frac{1}{2}*2\): we choose 6 people out of 9 (XXX XXA, 6/9) and then 1 people out of the other 2 (BB 1/2). Then multiply by 2 because we choose again 6 people out of 9 (XXXXXB) and then 1 people out of the other 2 (AA).

\(\frac{5}{9}*\frac{4}{8}\): then we focus only on the other 5 that are not siblings (XXXXX). We choose this 5 people (XXXXX) out of all 9 (then 5/9) and we combine this one with the remaining 4 of the group (XXXX) of the remaining 8.

Reversal Probability approach:
P = 1-q (q=probability of choosing one sibling)

\(q= \frac{2}{9} * \frac{1}{8} + \frac{2}{9} * \frac{1}{8} = \frac{4}{72} = \frac{1}{18}\)
\(P = 1-q = \frac{18}{18} - \frac{1}{18} = \frac{17}{18}\)

\(\frac{2}{9}\): probability of picking the person A from AABBXXXXX
\(\frac{1}{8}\): probability of picking the other A from the remaining ABBXXXXX

Then we add the probability of picking B from AABBXXXXX and probability of picking again B from AABXXXXX

Combinatorial approach:

\(P= \frac{{C^6_1 * C^2_1 + C^6_1 * C^2_1 + C^5_2}}{C^9_2}= \frac{{6*2 + 6*2 + 10}}{36} = \frac{34}{36} = \frac{17}{18}\)

\(C^6_1 * C^2_1\): we choose one people from AXXXXX and combine with one people of BB
\(C^6_1 * C^2_1\): we pick one people of BXXXXX and combine it with one people of AA
\(C^5_2\): we choose 2 people from XXXXX
\(C^9_2\): total combinations of 2 from 9.

Reversal Combinatorial approach:

\(q= \frac{{C^2_1 + C^2_1}}{C^9_2}= \frac{{2 + 2}}{72} =\frac{4}{72} = \frac{1}{18}\)
\(P = 1-q = \frac{18}{18} - \frac{1}{18} = \frac{17}{18}\)

\(C^2_1\): we choose 2 persons from the sibling (AA)
\(C^2_1\): we choose 2 persons from the sibling (BB)
User avatar
russ9
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Last visit: 20 Apr 2015
Posts: 174
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Posts: 174
Kudos: 400
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please explain where i'm going wrong?

I'm using the approach: No Sibling Pair = 1 - Probability of sibling pair.

P = \(\frac{(9C4)(1C1)}{(9C2)}\) -- why is this wrong? Is this equation not implying that at first, I have the probability of choose 4 people out of 9, then I can only pick 1 so my top is the favorable solution. My denominator is the total number of outcomes.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,368
 [3]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,368
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
russ9
There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of siblings within that group. If we choose two people, what is the probability that they will not be siblings?


Can someone please explain where i'm going wrong?

I'm using the approach: No Sibling Pair = 1 - Probability of sibling pair.

P = \(\frac{(9C4)(1C1)}{(9C2)}\) -- why is this wrong? Is this equation not implying that at first, I have the probability of choose 4 people out of 9, then I can only pick 1 so my top is the favorable solution. My denominator is the total number of outcomes.

The numerator is wrong. We are not choosing 4 people, we are choosing 2.

How many ways to choose a sibling pair from 9 people where there are two pairs of siblings (X, X, Y, Y, A, B, C, D, E)? Only two ways XX and YY.

Hence, P = 1 - 2/(9C2) = 1 - 1/18 = 17/18.
avatar
ankitarihaan
Joined: 30 Oct 2013
Last visit: 11 Jul 2014
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 3
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of siblings within that group. If we choose two people, what is the probability that they will not be siblings?

I need to choose two people from a group of 9 . I will choose 1 the probablitiy is 100% (9/9), then I have to choose the second person in such a manner that he is not the sibling of the 1 I chose, therefor amongst the 8 I am still left with, the probability becomes 7/8 (excluding the one sibling of the first). Please correct my approach and preferably donot provide me with an alternative solution. It would be of great help.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,368
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,368
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ankitarihaan
There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of siblings within that group. If we choose two people, what is the probability that they will not be siblings?

I need to choose two people from a group of 9 . I will choose 1 the probablitiy is 100% (9/9), then I have to choose the second person in such a manner that he is not the sibling of the 1 I chose, therefor amongst the 8 I am still left with, the probability becomes 7/8 (excluding the one sibling of the first). Please correct my approach and preferably donot provide me with an alternative solution. It would be of great help.

The point is that if you choose a person which has no sibling then the probability that the second person won't be his/her sibling would be 1. That's why this approach does not work.

Correct approach is here: there-are-9-people-in-the-room-there-are-two-pairs-of-58609.html#p1357845

Hope it helps.
User avatar
narmis95
Joined: 02 Sep 2022
Last visit: 11 Oct 2022
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 12
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Bunuel,
I was solving this as follows (similar to walker's solution #3):

P(siblings are not chosen) = P(both are picked from 5-singles) + P(one is picked from 5-singles and one from 4-siblings) + P(one is picked from 4-siblings and other is picked from remaining sibling)
= 5/9*4/8 + 5/9*4/8 + 4/9*2/8
=12/18 = 2/3

How is this logic flawed?
User avatar
vernondcruz123
Joined: 15 Nov 2018
Last visit: 25 Feb 2024
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You could also think of it like this:

Sibling Pair 1: A1, A1
Sibling Pair 2: B1, B2

2 People Selected but both not siblings would mean, the sum of these cases
Case 1: A1 selected but not A2 = 1/9 * 7/8
Case 2: A2 selected but not A1 = 1/9 * 7/8
Case 3: B1 selected but not B2 = 1/9 * 7/8
Case 4: B2 selected but not B1 = 1/9 * 7/8
Case 5: Any one other than the 4 siblings selected on the first go followed by anyone from the remaining 8 selected on the second go = 5/9 * 1

FInal = 4 * (1/9 * 7/8) + 5/9 = 17/18
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,589
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,589
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
Tuck School Moderator
805 posts