November 20, 2018 November 20, 2018 09:00 AM PST 10:00 AM PST The reward for signing up with the registration form and attending the chat is: 6 free examPAL quizzes to practice your new skills after the chat. November 20, 2018 November 20, 2018 06:00 PM EST 07:00 PM EST What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2626
Location: New York City

There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jan 2008, 06:10
Question Stats:
44% (10:17) correct 56% (02:04) wrong based on 65 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of siblings within that group. If we choose two people, what is the probability that they will not be siblings?
_________________
You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is 'never try'. Homer Simpson




CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3444
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth)  Class of 2011

Re: prob  pairs
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jan 2008, 07:41
another ways: 1. \(p=\frac{C^9_2C^2_1}{C^9_2}=1\frac{2}{36}=\frac{17}{18}\) or 2. \(p=\frac{P^9_2P^2_1*P^2_2}{P^9_2}=1\frac{4}{72}=\frac{17}{18}\) or 3. \(p=\frac49*\frac78+\frac59*\frac88=\frac{68}{72}=\frac{17}{18}\) probability questions always have a few ways bmwhype2, thanks for your question +1
_________________
HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android)  The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a musthave app especially if you aim at 700+  Limited GMAT/GRE Math tutoring in Chicago




Director
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 595

Re: prob  pairs
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jan 2008, 06:32
here is another solution. The number of ways to pick 2 people from a group of 9 is equal to 9*(91)/2 = 36
there are only 2 pairs of siblings in the room. Therefore, probability of choosing a pair of siblings is 2/36 = 1/18. Probability of choosing a pair who are not siblings is 11/18 = 17/18




Director
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 845

Re: prob  pairs
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jan 2008, 06:38



SVP
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2433

Re: prob  pairs
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jan 2008, 13:40
bmwhype2 wrote: There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of siblings within that group. If we choose two people, what is the probability that they will not be siblings? we have XXXXXBBCC We have to take into the account when we have XX, XB, XC So 5/9*4/8 5/9*2/8 and 5/9*2/8 note we need to multiply these by 2 (except the first) b/c we can have BX and CX. 20+20+20 > 60/72 > 30/36 > 15/18 then next is BC 2/9*2/8 > 4/72 2/36 1/18 > multiply this by 2 b/c of CB so 2/18+15/18 > 17/18



Director
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 845

Re: prob  pairs
[#permalink]
Show Tags
18 Jan 2008, 04:47
9 people are standing in a room. Included are 2 pairs of siblings (so 4 people, each with on sibling) What is the probability of picking two people that are NOT siblings. Start with 1, because that's 100% probability. From here we'll subtract the chances of getting a pair of siblings. What we have left is the probability of choosing 2 people who are NOT siblings. Now we start our choosing. We have 9 people to choose from for our 1st choice. Out of these 9 people we must choose one of the 4 with siblings. If we choose one of the 5 people without siblings then our second choice won't matter at all because they have no relatives we can pick up. = probability of picking 1 of 4 people with siblings from a group of 9 Now we have to find how many ways we can choose that persons sibling once we have chosen one of the 4. We have 8 people left to choose from and since there are pairs of siblings, each of the 4 people only has ONE sibling. Thus, there is only 1 person we can choose out of the remaining 8. probability of picking the sibling of the first person we selected Put it all together:



SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1682
Location: New York

Re: prob  pairs
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Aug 2008, 14:41
bmwhype2 wrote: There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of siblings within that group. If we choose two people, what is the probability that they will not be siblings? = 1 (2C2*2/9C2) = 11/18 = 17/18
_________________
Your attitude determines your altitude Smiling wins more friends than frowning



Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Posts: 233

Re: prob  pairs
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Mar 2009, 10:57
x2suresh wrote: bmwhype2 wrote: There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of siblings within that group. If we choose two people, what is the probability that they will not be siblings? = 1 (2C2*2/9C2) = 11/18 = 17/18 Method 1 : total number of ways of choosing 2 people out of 9 = 9C2 = 36 probability of choosing two people so that they are siblings = 2C1 = 2 { since there are two pairs of siblings } required probability = (36 2) /36 = 17/18. Method 2 : total number of ways = 36 let say the nine people that we have are A, B, C, D, E, S11, S12, S21, S22 where (S11, S12) and (S21, S22) are sibling pairs. number of ways one can choose two people is : choose 2 from A, B, C, D, E . Number of ways = 5C2 = 10. choose 1 from A, B, C, D, E AND 1 from (S11, S12, S21, S22) in 5*4 = 20 ways choose 1 from (S11, S12) and 1 from (S21, S22) in 4 ways . total number of ways = 34 probability = 34/36 = 17/18



Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2008
Posts: 179

Re: prob  pairs
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Sep 2009, 05:36
There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of siblings within that group. If we choose two people, what is the probability that they will not be siblings?
Soln: probability that they will not be siblings = 1  Probability that they will be siblings = 1  (4/9 * 1/8) = 1  (1/18) = 17/18



Intern
Joined: 29 Nov 2009
Posts: 7

Re: prob  pairs
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Nov 2009, 13:33
Can someone correct my logic
No siblings can be achieved by 1. selecting 1 of siblings 4/9 * selecting 1 from the other pair of siblings 2/4 + 2. selecting nonsibling 5/9 * selecting anyone from the rest 8/8
so 4/9 * 2/4 + 5/9*8/8 = 2/9 + 5/9 = 7/9
Edit: nevermind. I saw the previous post 2/4 should be 7/8, makes sense.



Intern
Joined: 20 Apr 2010
Posts: 30

Re: prob  pairs
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Sep 2010, 17:38
Struggling with this one here. I applied the methodology used to arrive at the answer for the married couples. For the denominator, you have 9*8 ways of choosing 2 people. For the numerator, you have 9 ways of choosing the first person, and then 7 ways of choosing the second person (excluding the other sibling pair). So, (9*7)/(9*8) = 7/8. Why does this not work in this situation? Thanks.
In the married couple example, we are taking 4 people out of 12 to determine the probability that none of them are married to each other. In this case we are looking for the probability that 2 people are not siblings, so the concept is the same.



Intern
Joined: 28 Mar 2011
Posts: 31

Re: prob  pairs
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jun 2011, 04:28
Hi Walker,
With reference to your solution for the married couples problem where in we have to select 4 people out of 6 couples such that none is married to each other,can this problem be tackled in the same way?
How will we arrive at the solution?
Thanks!
regards,



CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3444
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth)  Class of 2011

Re: prob  pairs
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jun 2011, 05:34
You can use the same approach but it's important to note that not all people have siblings. \(C^5_2\)  the number of options to choose 2 people out of 5 people without siblings \(C^5_1*C^2_1*C^2_1\)  the number of options to choose 1 person out of 5 without siblings, choose 1 pair of siblings out of 2, choose 1 person out of the pair. \(C^2_1*C^2_1\)  the number of options to choose 1 person out of 2 for each pair of siblings. \(p = \frac{C^5_2+C^5_1*C^2_1*C^2_1+C^2_1*C^2_1}{C^9_2} = \frac{10+20+4}{36} = \frac{34}{36} = \frac{17}{18}\)
_________________
HOT! GMAT TOOLKIT 2 (iOS) / GMAT TOOLKIT (Android)  The OFFICIAL GMAT CLUB PREP APP, a musthave app especially if you aim at 700+  Limited GMAT/GRE Math tutoring in Chicago



Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2011
Posts: 664

Re: prob  pairs
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jun 2011, 07:52
1  \((2c1+2c1)/9c2\)
=1 (2/36) = 34/36 = 17/18



Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2012
Posts: 69
Location: United States (VA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
WE: Consulting (Consulting)

Re: There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Jul 2013, 08:11
My approach : 1 p(1 minus the probability that the people we pick will be siblings) We have 9 people: A1  A2  B1  B2  C  D  E  F  G Probability of picking siblings: If we first pick A1, Probability of picking A1 \(p=\frac{1}{9}\frac\) (we pick 1 between 9) Then, probability of picking the sibling of A1, A2, after having picked A1: \(p=\frac{1}{8}\frac\) (we pick 1 between the remainder 8 people) * \(\frac{1}{9}\frac\) (conditional probability of picking A2 after having picked A1) = \(\frac{1}{72}\frac\) But, in addition, we could have picked A2 and then A1. Then: \(p=\frac{1}{72}\frac\) *2 = \(\frac{2}{72}\frac\) = \(\frac{1}{36}\frac\) The same if we picked first B1 and secondly B2 or ("or" means "+") if we first picked B2 and secondly B1. Then, the total probability of picking siblings is: \(p=\frac{1}{36}\frac\) * 2 = \(\frac{2}{36}\frac\) = \(\frac{1}{18}\frac\) Then, 1  p = \(\frac{18}{18}\frac\)  \(\frac{1}{18}\frac\) = \(\frac{17}{18}\frac\) Is right this logic? I am understanding the problem correctly
_________________
Encourage cooperation! If this post was very useful, kudos are welcome "It is our attitude at the beginning of a difficult task which, more than anything else, will affect It's successful outcome" William James



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 50627

Re: There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Jul 2013, 08:28
Maxirosario2012 wrote: My approach : 1 p(1 minus the probability that the people we pick will be siblings) We have 9 people: A1  A2  B1  B2  C  D  E  F  G Probability of picking siblings: If we first pick A1, Probability of picking A1 \(p=\frac{1}{9}\frac\) (we pick 1 between 9) Then, probability of picking the sibling of A1, A2, after having picked A1: \(p=\frac{1}{8}\frac\) (we pick 1 between the remainder 8 people) * \(\frac{1}{9}\frac\) (conditional probability of picking A2 after having picked A1) = \(\frac{1}{72}\frac\) But, in addition, we could have picked A2 and then A1. Then: \(p=\frac{1}{72}\frac\) *2 = \(\frac{2}{72}\frac\) = \(\frac{1}{36}\frac\) The same if we picked first B1 and secondly B2 or ("or" means "+") if we first picked B2 and secondly B1. Then, the total probability of picking siblings is: \(p=\frac{1}{36}\frac\) * 2 = \(\frac{2}{36}\frac\) = \(\frac{1}{18}\frac\) Then, 1  p = \(\frac{18}{18}\frac\)  \(\frac{1}{18}\frac\) = \(\frac{17}{18}\frac\) Is right this logic? I am understanding the problem correctly Absolutely, though not the most elegant way of solving.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics



Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2012
Posts: 69
Location: United States (VA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
WE: Consulting (Consulting)

Re: There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Jul 2013, 10:34
Thank you Bunuel! Yes, it is not the fastest approach
_________________
Encourage cooperation! If this post was very useful, kudos are welcome "It is our attitude at the beginning of a difficult task which, more than anything else, will affect It's successful outcome" William James



Manager
Joined: 02 Apr 2012
Posts: 69
Location: United States (VA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
WE: Consulting (Consulting)

Re: There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of
[#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Jul 2013, 15:17
There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of siblings within that group. If we choose two people, what is the probability that they will not be siblings? The reversal probability approach is the most efficient way to solve. But I explore the other methods just for practice. Tell me your opinions, I have a little doubt on the reversal combinatorial approach. Probability approach:
XXXXXAABB \(P= \frac{6}{9} * \frac{1}{2}*2 +\frac{5}{9}*\frac{4}{8} = \frac{12}{18} + \frac{5}{18} = \frac{17}{18}\) \(\frac{6}{9}*\frac{1}{2}*2\): we choose 6 people out of 9 (XXX XXA, 6/9) and then 1 people out of the other 2 (BB 1/2). Then multiply by 2 because we choose again 6 people out of 9 (XXXXXB) and then 1 people out of the other 2 (AA). \(\frac{5}{9}*\frac{4}{8}\): then we focus only on the other 5 that are not siblings (XXXXX). We choose this 5 people (XXXXX) out of all 9 (then 5/9) and we combine this one with the remaining 4 of the group (XXXX) of the remaining 8. Reversal Probability approach:P = 1q (q=probability of choosing one sibling) \(q= \frac{2}{9} * \frac{1}{8} + \frac{2}{9} * \frac{1}{8} = \frac{4}{72} = \frac{1}{18}\) \(P = 1q = \frac{18}{18}  \frac{1}{18} = \frac{17}{18}\) \(\frac{2}{9}\): probability of picking the person A from AABBXXXXX \(\frac{1}{8}\): probability of picking the other A from the remaining ABBXXXXX Then we add the probability of picking B from AABBXXXXX and probability of picking again B from AABXXXXX Combinatorial approach:\(P= \frac{{C^6_1 * C^2_1 + C^6_1 * C^2_1 + C^5_2}}{C^9_2}= \frac{{6*2 + 6*2 + 10}}{36} = \frac{34}{36} = \frac{17}{18}\) \(C^6_1 * C^2_1\): we choose one people from AXXXXX and combine with one people of BB \(C^6_1 * C^2_1\): we pick one people of BXXXXX and combine it with one people of AA \(C^5_2\): we choose 2 people from XXXXX \(C^9_2\): total combinations of 2 from 9. Reversal Combinatorial approach:\(q= \frac{{C^2_1 + C^2_1}}{C^9_2}= \frac{{2 + 2}}{72} =\frac{4}{72} = \frac{1}{18}\) \(P = 1q = \frac{18}{18}  \frac{1}{18} = \frac{17}{18}\) \(C^2_1\): we choose 2 persons from the sibling (AA) \(C^2_1\): we choose 2 persons from the sibling (BB)
_________________
Encourage cooperation! If this post was very useful, kudos are welcome "It is our attitude at the beginning of a difficult task which, more than anything else, will affect It's successful outcome" William James



Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2013
Posts: 251

Re: There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Apr 2014, 17:14
Can someone please explain where i'm going wrong?
I'm using the approach: No Sibling Pair = 1  Probability of sibling pair.
P = \(\frac{(9C4)(1C1)}{(9C2)}\)  why is this wrong? Is this equation not implying that at first, I have the probability of choose 4 people out of 9, then I can only pick 1 so my top is the favorable solution. My denominator is the total number of outcomes.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 50627

Re: There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Apr 2014, 23:19
russ9 wrote: There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of siblings within that group. If we choose two people, what is the probability that they will not be siblings?
Can someone please explain where i'm going wrong?
I'm using the approach: No Sibling Pair = 1  Probability of sibling pair.
P = \(\frac{(9C4)(1C1)}{(9C2)}\)  why is this wrong? Is this equation not implying that at first, I have the probability of choose 4 people out of 9, then I can only pick 1 so my top is the favorable solution. My denominator is the total number of outcomes. The numerator is wrong. We are not choosing 4 people, we are choosing 2. How many ways to choose a sibling pair from 9 people where there are two pairs of siblings (X, X, Y, Y, A, B, C, D, E)? Only two ways XX and YY. Hence, P = 1  2/(9C2) = 1  1/18 = 1/17.
_________________
New to the Math Forum? Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread  All You Need for Quant  PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!! Resources: GMAT Math Book  Triangles  Polygons  Coordinate Geometry  Factorials  Circles  Number Theory  Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets  PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders  GMAT Prep Software Analysis  SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS)  Tricky questions from previous years.
Collection of Questions: PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.
What are GMAT Club Tests? Extrahard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics




Re: There are 9 people in the room. There are two pairs of &nbs
[#permalink]
20 Apr 2014, 23:19



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 24 posts ]



