Important learning is in statement 2 where both the values are positive but given one of the value is more than 5 it got rejected. In Statement (2), both roots are positive, but one is greater than 5, and the stem explicitly tells us that n must be less than 5. Therefore, only n = 3 is possible.
Statement (1): Probability that both bulbs are defective = 1/15.
If n bulbs are defective, the number of ways to choose 2 defective bulbs is C(n,2). Total ways to choose any 2 bulbs is C(10,2) = 45.
Therefore, C(n,2)/45 = 1/15, so C(n,2) = 3.
Thus, n(n-1)/2 = 3, giving n(n-1) = 6. Recognize n(n-1) as the product of two consecutive integers. The consecutive integers whose product is 6 are 2 and 3, so n = 3. The other mathematical root is n = -2, which is impossible because n represents the number of defective bulbs. Therefore, Statement (1) alone is sufficient.
---
Statement (2): Probability that one bulb is defective and the other is not defective = 7/15.
There are n ways to choose the defective bulb and 10-n ways to choose the non-defective bulb. Therefore, the number of mixed pairs is n(10-n). Total possible pairs are C(10,2) = 45.
Therefore, n(10-n)/45 = 7/15, so n(10-n) = 21.
This gives 10n - n^2 = 21, or n^2 - 10n + 21 = 0. Factoring gives (n-3)(n-7) = 0, so n = 3 or n = 7.
Important learning: In Statement (2), both possible values are positive. Unlike Statement (1), where the other root was negative and could immediately be rejected, here both values are mathematically valid positive values. However, the stem gives additional information: fewer than half of the 10 bulbs are defective, so n < 5. Therefore, n = 7 must be rejected, leaving n = 3.
So Statement (2) alone is also sufficient.
---
Answer: D - Each statement alone is sufficient.