Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 10:59 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 10:59
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
boubi
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Last visit: 09 Jul 2016
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
81
 [64]
Products:
Posts: 27
Kudos: 81
 [64]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
61
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
HavoK_MAT
Joined: 18 Jul 2007
Last visit: 27 Dec 2007
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
9
 [9]
Posts: 12
Kudos: 9
 [9]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chippoochan
Joined: 01 Aug 2016
Last visit: 05 Feb 2019
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
65
 [7]
Given Kudos: 239
Location: Thailand
Concentration: Accounting, Finance
GMAT 1: 630 Q48 V28
GPA: 3.82
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
GMAT 1: 630 Q48 V28
Posts: 26
Kudos: 65
 [7]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
BelalHossain046
Joined: 11 Feb 2013
Last visit: 05 Apr 2023
Posts: 198
Own Kudos:
314
 [1]
Given Kudos: 60
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 490 Q44 V15
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GRE 1: Q165 V155
GPA: 3.05
WE:Analyst (Commercial Banking)
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GRE 1: Q165 V155
Posts: 198
Kudos: 314
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement B:

In case of DIFFERENT observation dataset, any observation greater than MEDIAN is always GREATER than the MEAN and
any observation less than the MEDIAN is always LESS than the MEAN.

Because the DEFICIT (from the mean) SMALLER observations are creating is covered by the SURPLUS (from the mean) coming from LARGER VALUES.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
DavidTutorexamPAL
User avatar
examPAL Representative
Joined: 07 Dec 2017
Last visit: 09 Sep 2020
Posts: 1,012
Own Kudos:
2,011
 [3]
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 1,012
Kudos: 2,011
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The Logical approach to this question will use the logic behind average.
Statement (1) tells us that the median is 70, which means that (since the integers are all different from one another) the two largest number are each larger than 70, and thus their average is also larger than 70. That's enough information!
Statement (2) tells us that the average is 70. Imagine that all numbers were 70. Now, even in the extreme example that the smaller for of them are negative, the largest one must 'make up for the deficit' of the others. Thus, the average of the two larger ones must be larger than 70.
And if this is too theoretical to grasp, using extreme numeric examples can help: 68,69,70,71,72 vs. -100,-90,-80,-70,410. In both cases the average is 70, but the smaller the second largest number, the greater the largest one, and their average only becomes further from 70.
So the second statement is also enough on its own.
The correct answer is (D).

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
ShreyasJavahar
Joined: 30 Sep 2019
Last visit: 24 Dec 2022
Posts: 93
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 421
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V37
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38
Posts: 93
Kudos: 67
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DavidTutorexamPAL
The Logical approach to this question will use the logic behind average.
Statement (1) tells us that the median is 70, which means that (since the integers are all different from one another) the two largest number are each larger than 70, and thus their average is also larger than 70. That's enough information!
Statement (2) tells us that the average is 70. Imagine that all numbers were 70. Now, even in the extreme example that the smaller for of them are negative, the largest one must 'make up for the deficit' of the others. Thus, the average of the two larger ones must be larger than 70.
And if this is too theoretical to grasp, using extreme numeric examples can help: 68,69,70,71,72 vs. -100,-90,-80,-70,410. In both cases the average is 70, but the smaller the second largest number, the greater the largest one, and their average only becomes further from 70.
So the second statement is also enough on its own.
The correct answer is (D).

Posted from my mobile device

Hi David,
Tiny doubt regarding statement 2. Say we start from all the 5 numbers being equal to 70, in that case the average of the 2 greatest integers in the set be equal to 70 and not greater. The other values that could be assigned to the integers within the constraints of the statement would give us an average greater than 70 for the greatest two digits. Wouldn't that render statement 2 insufficient? Considering there are two possibilities and the question specifically asks for an average greater than 70.
User avatar
ShilpiAgnihotrii
Joined: 27 Dec 2022
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 359
Location: India
Schools: ESSEC Kellogg IIM
Schools: ESSEC Kellogg IIM
Posts: 84
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
boubi
A certain list consists of five different integers. Is the average (arithmetic mean) of the two greatest integers in the list greater than 70 ?

(1) The median of the integers in the list is 70.
(2) The average of the integers in the list is 70.
­Bunuel, kindly need your help with the 1st statement of this question.
What if the list is (-5, -2, 70, 70 , 70, 70), then it is insufficient, right ?
Thanks in advance!
 
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,308
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ShilpiAgnihotrii

boubi
A certain list consists of five different integers. Is the average (arithmetic mean) of the two greatest integers in the list greater than 70 ?

(1) The median of the integers in the list is 70.
(2) The average of the integers in the list is 70.
­Bunuel, kindly need your help with the 1st statement of this question.
What if the list is (-5, -2, 70, 70 , 70, 70), then it is insufficient, right ?
Thanks in advance!

 
­Pay attention to the highlighted word in the stem.
User avatar
ShilpiAgnihotrii
Joined: 27 Dec 2022
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 359
Location: India
Schools: ESSEC Kellogg IIM
Schools: ESSEC Kellogg IIM
Posts: 84
Kudos: 68
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel

ShilpiAgnihotrii

boubi
A certain list consists of five different integers. Is the average (arithmetic mean) of the two greatest integers in the list greater than 70 ?

(1) The median of the integers in the list is 70.
(2) The average of the integers in the list is 70.
­Bunuel, kindly need your help with the 1st statement of this question.
What if the list is (-5, -2, 70, 70 , 70, 70), then it is insufficient, right ?
Thanks in advance!


 
­Pay attention to the highlighted word in the stem.
­I again did the same blunder 🤒 my bad!! thanks for highlighting Bunuel. 
User avatar
siddhantvarma
Joined: 12 May 2024
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 539
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 196
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q87 V82 DI75
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q87 V82 DI75
Posts: 539
Kudos: 715
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A note for statement 2:

Think of the average of a set of numbers as a “balance point.”
Some numbers are below this balance point, and some are above it.

If you take just the biggest few numbers, you’re only taking numbers that are all above the balance point (since they’re the largest ones).
So naturally, their average will sit above the overall average.

The only exception is if you take all the numbers. In that case, you get the same overall average again.

So the average of the top n numbers is always greater than the overall average, unless you include the entire set (in which case it’s equal).
User avatar
KelyDM
Joined: 12 May 2025
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 157
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have some doubt about statement 2 bein sufficient, since the prompt did not say that the integers in the list were consecutive, it only said that they were different.

That means we can also get a list such as this [66, 67, 68, 69, 80]
In this particular case 69 < 70 and only 80 > 70

HavoK_MAT
i believe it's D

Statement 1: you have 5 numbers _ _ _ _ _
if the median is 70 you have _ _ 70 _ _
the problem states "list consists of five DIFFERENT integers" thus the two greatest must be at LEAST 71 and 72 making their average > 70

Statement 2: start with imagining all 5 numbers as 70.
70 70 70 70 70, this is the only case where the average of all numbers will be 70 with the two greatest NOT being greater than 70.
we know from the problem that all the integers are different. so for each number that gets smaller, another will get bigger. so even in this case
69 70 70 70 71, already the average of the 2 greatest is > 70, but even this case isn't possible.
68 69 70 71 72 is the limit. the average of the 2 greatest will be at least 71.5

it's hard to explain, but to me is the fastest way of logically accepting B

maybe an easier way of explaining statement 2 is:
if the 3 smaller are less than 70, the 2 greater have no choice but to average more than 70... to double check yourself, 69 + 69 + 69 = 207...
then the sum of 2 larger numbers = 143 (divide by 2) the avg is > 70

if 4 of the numbers are smaller than 70. the largest number must be greater than 70 to the point it must make up for all of the numbers less than 70. if the greatest and 2nd greatest (where the 2nd greatest is less than 70) average 70 the other 3 numbers will offset the average to less than 70. thus the greatest number must be bigger taking the average of it plus the 2nd greatest to greater than 70.

--------------a-b-c-d--------------------70-------------------e

a visual way to see it is if d and e are both the same distance from 70 (avg 70) the avg of all 5 will be < 70. e must be farther to the right to offset a, b, and c making d and e's average > 70

all apologies for the abstract and unnecessarily long explanation... but i think getting into the habit of testing limits and thinking like this will help a lot.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,308
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KelyDM
I have some doubt about statement 2 bein sufficient, since the prompt did not say that the integers in the list were consecutive, it only said that they were different.

That means we can also get a list such as this [66, 67, 68, 69, 80]
In this particular case 69 < 70 and only 80 > 70



The question asks whether the average of the two greatest integers in the list is greater than 70, not whether both integers are greater than 70. The average of 69 and 80 is greater than 70.

The second statement is sufficient because if the average of all five different integers is greater than 70, then the average of the two greatest integers cannot possibly be 70 or less.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
496 posts