Last visit was: 10 Jul 2025, 04:21 It is currently 10 Jul 2025, 04:21
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
devinawilliam83
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Last visit: 01 Mar 2013
Posts: 115
Own Kudos:
1,614
 [261]
Given Kudos: 11
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
WE:Operations (Insurance)
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
Posts: 115
Kudos: 1,614
 [261]
30
Kudos
Add Kudos
230
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,612
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98,069
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,612
Kudos: 740,019
 [81]
40
Kudos
Add Kudos
40
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,612
Own Kudos:
740,019
 [9]
Given Kudos: 98,069
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,612
Kudos: 740,019
 [9]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
jaswinder46
Joined: 18 May 2012
Last visit: 25 Jul 2012
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
6
 [1]
Posts: 1
Kudos: 6
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
please explain why salary - commission is in absoulute value sign?
User avatar
santorasantu
Joined: 27 Aug 2014
Last visit: 06 Apr 2023
Posts: 242
Own Kudos:
453
 [2]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: Netherlands
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Schools: ISB '21 LBS '22
GPA: 3.9
WE:Analyst (Energy)
Schools: ISB '21 LBS '22
Posts: 242
Kudos: 453
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
devinawilliam83
Why is the answer to this A and not D?
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?

Given: {Income}={salary}+{commission}. Question basically asks: is {salary}>{commission}?

(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year --> 1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission} --> {salary}=2{commission} --> {salary}>{commission}. Sufficient.

(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year --> |{salary}-{commission}|=0.5{salary}, notice that {salary}-{commission} is in absolute value sign ||, meaning that we can have two cases:

A. {salary}-{commission}=0.5{salary} --> 0.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}>{commission}, thus the answer would be YES;
Or:
A. {commission}-{salary}=0.5{salary} --> 1.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}<{commission}, thus the answer would be No.
Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.


Dear Bunuel,

I'm not sure if you need to consider two cases here based on the question's second statement.
It is like stating " if the difference between A and B is 4, I would consider A-B = 4 and not |A-B| =4.

The similar question, which you used to merge the topic clearly specifies that the absolute difference between the base salary and the commission is..., there I can understand the two cases but not for the question above, where it does not state anything about the absolute difference.

Please correct if I'm wrong.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,788
Own Kudos:
12,488
 [3]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,788
Kudos: 12,488
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi santorasantu,

The prompt never stated whether the base salary was larger than the commission or the commission was larger than the base salary, so we CANNOT assume that the base salary is bigger just because it was mentioned first in the sentence. The word "difference" implies that one of them IS bigger, but we don't know which one. THAT is why Bunuel addressed it.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
avatar
stopchange
Joined: 31 Jul 2015
Last visit: 29 Oct 2015
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For statement 1, why can we assume that the base salary stays the same? i.e no percent change associated with base salary. If only the commission had been 30% higher, then the answer would be A, but what if the base salary could be, for example, 20% lower? Wouldn't the answer then be E?

Thanks
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,788
Own Kudos:
12,488
 [1]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,788
Kudos: 12,488
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi stopchange,

The specific question that is asked refers to a base salary and a commission LAST YEAR, so we're dealing with 2 unknowns, NOT 2 variables. This means that the two numbers are constants, but we do NOT know what they are (and thus, we don't know which one is bigger).

Fact 1 uses a 'hypothetical' that points out that increasing JUST the commission (by 30%) would have led to an increase in income (of 10%). By extension, this assumes that the other pieces (in this case, the base salary) stay the same.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
avatar
GouthamNandu
Joined: 21 May 2016
Last visit: 14 Jan 2024
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am not still satisfied with the explanation given above.How can we assume 2 cases when it is mentioned in statement (2) that difference between the amount of salesman's base salary and the the amount of commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year.
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,788
Own Kudos:
12,488
 [1]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,788
Kudos: 12,488
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GouthamNandu,

The prompt never stated whether the base salary was larger than the commission or the commission was larger than the base salary, so we CANNOT assume that the base salary is bigger just because it was mentioned first in the sentence. The word "difference" implies that one of them IS bigger, but we don't know which one. Bunuel addresses this point in one of his posts.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
BrentGMATPrepNow
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 13 May 2024
Posts: 6,756
Own Kudos:
34,047
 [7]
Given Kudos: 799
Location: Canada
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 6,756
Kudos: 34,047
 [7]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
devinawilliam83
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?

(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year.

(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year.

Target question: Was the salesman's base salary larger than his commission last year?
This is a good candidate for rephrasing the target question.

Let B = base salary last year
Let C = commission last year
So, B+C = TOTAL income last year
REPHRASED target question: Is B greater than C?

Statement 1: If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's total income (salary plus commission) would have been 10 percent higher last year.
If we increase the commission by 30% the NEW commission = 1.3C, which means the TOTAL income = 1.3C + B
This NEW income is 10% greater than the actual TOTAL income (B+C)
We can write: 1.3C + B = 1.1(B + C)
Expand: 1.3C + B = 1.1B + 1.1C
Rearrange to get: 0.2C = 0.1B
Make "prettier" by multiplying both sides by 10 to get: 2C = 1B
Since C and B are both POSITIVE, we can see that B must be greater than C (since B is equal to C+C)
Another way say this is, B is greater than C
Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: The absolute difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year.
We can write: |C - B| = 0.5B
This gives us two possible cases:
Case a: C - B = 0.5B. When we solve this for C, we get C = 1.5B, which means B is NOT greater than C
Case b: C - B = -0.5B. When we solve this for C, we get C = 0.5B, which means B IS greater than C
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: A

RELATED VIDEO
avatar
zanaik89
Joined: 19 Aug 2016
Last visit: 29 Nov 2019
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 30
Posts: 54
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
devinawilliam83
Why is the answer to this A and not D?
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?

Given: {Income}={salary}+{commission}. Question basically asks: is {salary}>{commission}?

(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year --> 1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission} --> {salary}=2{commission} --> {salary}>{commission}. Sufficient.

(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year --> |{salary}-{commission}|=0.5{salary}, notice that {salary}-{commission} is in absolute value sign ||, meaning that we can have two cases:

A. {salary}-{commission}=0.5{salary} --> 0.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}>{commission}, thus the answer would be YES;
Or:
A. {commission}-{salary}=0.5{salary} --> 1.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}<{commission}, thus the answer would be No.
Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

In Option A

How did u get {salary}=2{commission}. Please help
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 10 Jul 2025
Posts: 102,612
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 98,069
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,612
Kudos: 740,019
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
zanaik89
Bunuel
devinawilliam83
Why is the answer to this A and not D?
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?

Given: {Income}={salary}+{commission}. Question basically asks: is {salary}>{commission}?

(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year --> 1.1({salary}+{commission})={salary}+1.3{commission} --> {salary}=2{commission} --> {salary}>{commission}. Sufficient.

(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year --> |{salary}-{commission}|=0.5{salary}, notice that {salary}-{commission} is in absolute value sign ||, meaning that we can have two cases:

A. {salary}-{commission}=0.5{salary} --> 0.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}>{commission}, thus the answer would be YES;
Or:
A. {commission}-{salary}=0.5{salary} --> 1.5{salary}={commission} --> {salary}<{commission}, thus the answer would be No.
Not sufficient.

Answer: A.

Hope it's clear.

In Option A

How did u get {salary}=2{commission}. Please help


1.1({salary} + {commission}) = {salary} + 1.3{commission};

1.1{salary} + 1.1{commission} = {salary} + 1.3{commission};

0.1{salary} = 0.2{commission};

{salary}=2{commission}.

Hope it's clear.
avatar
gsmina
Joined: 17 Jan 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2021
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 85
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
WE:Supply Chain Management (Manufacturing)
Posts: 48
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
devinawilliam83
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?

(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year.

(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year.


Approximation using critical reasoning here

1. Question Stem is having "base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year".
so i need prove the same, in order to solve this question.

statement 1. it is understood that after increasing 30% commission overall salary increased by 10% - meant base salary is larger than commission.

Sufficient

Statement 2. this statement is talking about difference of both is 50%..... blah blah. and clearly stated indirectly that it is not sufficient.

hence answer is A. :)

trust it make sense GMATPrepNow?
User avatar
h31337u
Joined: 26 Jul 2014
Last visit: 10 May 2023
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 84
Kudos: 89
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?

(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year.

(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year.

____________________________________________________

from the question, we know base + commission = total
Base = b
commision = c
total = t

from the statement 1,
1.3c + b = 1.1c + 1.1b
--> 0.2c = 0.1b
--> 2c = b
clearly, b > c.
sufficient

from the statement 2,
b-c = 0.5b
--> 0.5b = c
--> b = 2c
therefore b > c.
sufficient

the answer is D
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,788
Own Kudos:
12,488
 [1]
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,788
Kudos: 12,488
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
h31337u
A certain salesman's yearly income is determined by a base salary plus a commission on the sales he makes during the year. Did the salesman's base salary account for more than half of the salesman's yearly income last year?

(1) If the amount of the commission had been 30 percent higher, the salesman's income would have been 10 percent higher last year.

(2) The difference between the amount of the salesman's base salary and the amount of the commission was equal to 50 percent of the salesman's base salary last year.

____________________________________________________

from the question, we know base + commission = total
Base = b
commision = c
total = t

from the statement 1,
1.3c + b = 1.1c + 1.1b
--> 0.2c = 0.1b
--> 2c = b
clearly, b > c.
sufficient

from the statement 2,
b-c = 0.5b
--> 0.5b = c
--> b = 2c
therefore b > c.
sufficient

the answer is D

Hi h31337u,

The prompt never stated whether the base salary was larger than the commission or the commission was larger than the base salary, so we CANNOT assume that the base salary is bigger just because it was mentioned earlier in the sentence in Fact 2. The word "difference" implies that one of them IS bigger, but we don't know which one. Bunuel addresses this point in one of his posts.

Algebraically, this means that there are TWO possibilities:

B - C = 0.5B

OR

C - B = 0.5B

These two equations will lead to different results (and different answers to the question that is asked), so Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
Kritisood
Joined: 21 Feb 2017
Last visit: 19 Jul 2023
Posts: 492
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,090
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Products:
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Posts: 492
Kudos: 1,217
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Manhattans OE:

Let s be the salesman's base salary, and let c be his total commission. From the question stem we can phrase the question as:

Is c > s?

(1) SUFFICIENT: The salesman's total income is defined as s + c. This allows us to construct the following equation:

1.1( s + c) = s + 1.3 c

This gives us:
1.1 s + 1.1 c = s + 1.3 c

0.1 s = 0.2 c

Therefore c is one half the size of the salesman's base salary — and both numbers must be non-negative. This implies that the salary must account for two-thirds of the income. Thus we can answer definitively that the commission was not larger than his salary — indeed the opposite is true.

(2) INSUFFICIENT: Either s – c = .5 s or c – s = .5 s. We can say that one of the two is larger but we don't know which.

The correct answer is A.
User avatar
DanTe02
Joined: 06 Apr 2020
Last visit: 09 Dec 2024
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
Schools: Wharton '23
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Products:
Schools: Wharton '23
Posts: 121
Kudos: 65
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Should'nt the second statement say the absolute difference between base and commision for us to employ modulus?
I want to know if on gmat the question reads that ..... the difference between a and b is bla bla should i equate a-b = bla bla or should i use |a-b|=bla bla or should i look out for something to tell the difference
User avatar
EMPOWERgmatRichC
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Last visit: 31 Dec 2023
Posts: 21,788
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 450
Status:GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Posts: 21,788
Kudos: 12,488
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Deeptanshu02
Should'nt the second statement say the absolute difference between base and commision for us to employ modulus?
I want to know if on gmat the question reads that ..... the difference between a and b is bla bla should i equate a-b = bla bla or should i use |a-b|=bla bla or should i look out for something to tell the difference

Hi Deeptanshu02,

The prompt never stated whether the base salary was larger than the commission or the commission was larger than the base salary, so we CANNOT assume that the base salary is bigger just because it was mentioned earlier in the sentence in Fact 2. The word "difference" implies that one of them IS bigger, but we don't know which one.

If you find that you are not sure about the exact meaning of a phrase in a Quant question, then it can sometimes help to create a simple example to define whether a pattern exists or not. For example:

The difference between Tom's net worth and Mark Zuckerberg's net worth is approximately 85 billion dollars....

So who has a higher net worth? Tom or Mark Zuckerberg?

Tom appears first in the sentence, but Mark Zuckerberg is the one who has the higher net worth. In simple terms, the modulus is 'implied' (and it does not matter who is first in the sentence).

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
User avatar
DanTe02
Joined: 06 Apr 2020
Last visit: 09 Dec 2024
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
Schools: Wharton '23
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Products:
Schools: Wharton '23
Posts: 121
Kudos: 65
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
"The difference between Tom's net worth and Mark Zuckerberg's net worth is approximately 85 billion dollars....
" Well the statement implies its T-M=85billion dollar if we dont know whose net worth is bigger shouldnt we say that the absolute difference between Tom's net worth and Mark Zuckerberg's net worth is approximately 85 billion dollars.... or if we know whose bigger it should be difference between mark and toms net worth either way my opinion does'nt matter on GMAT What matter is how GMAC thinks so does GMAC Cosnider the sentence construction in red and in green the same?
 1   2   
Moderator:
Math Expert
102612 posts