Last visit was: 03 Nov 2024, 14:38 It is currently 03 Nov 2024, 14:38
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
asch13
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Last visit: 10 Sep 2010
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
197
 [183]
Posts: 12
Kudos: 197
 [183]
12
Kudos
Add Kudos
171
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 31 Dec 1969
Posts: 96,505
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 87,899
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 96,505
Kudos: 673,789
 [79]
32
Kudos
Add Kudos
47
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 03 Nov 2024
Posts: 15,427
Own Kudos:
69,248
 [17]
Given Kudos: 446
Location: Pune, India
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,427
Kudos: 69,248
 [17]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
6
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
asch13
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Last visit: 10 Sep 2010
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
197
 [10]
Posts: 12
Kudos: 197
 [10]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Cost(C) = Labor(L) + Materials(M)
Profit(P) = 500,000-C
is 500,000 - C > 150,000?
is C < 350,000

(1) C = 3M
C = 3M = L + M, L = 2M

(2) P > L
Substitute 2M for L
P > 2M
multiply both sides by 3/2
(3/2)P > 3M
Substitute C for 3M
(3/2)P > C
plug 150,000 in for P
(3/2)(150,000) > C
225,000 > C

So, C < 350,000 and the answer is yes, so then (1) and (2) together are sufficient
User avatar
asch13
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Last visit: 10 Sep 2010
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
197
 [2]
Posts: 12
Kudos: 197
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
asch13
A construction company was paid a total of $500,000 for a construction project. The company's only costs for the project were for labor and materials. Was the company's profit greater than $150,000?

(1) The company's total cost was three times its cost for materials.

(2) The company's profit was greater than its cost for labor

Given: \(c=l+m\)
Question is \(p=500-c>150\) true?

(1) \(c=3m\) --> is \(500-3m>150\) true? --> is \(m<\frac{350}{3}\approx{117}\) true? Not sufficient.

(2) \(500-(l+m)>l\) --> \(500>2l+m\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Question became is \(m<\frac{350}{3}\approx{117}\) true? From (1) \(c=l+m=3m\) --> \(l=2m\). From (2) \(500>2l+m=4m+m=5m\) --> \(m<100\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

wow, that was fast, I was just typing my explanation, but yours looks much simpler. thanks
User avatar
dauntingmcgee
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Last visit: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
35
 [5]
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 15
Kudos: 35
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My solution:

1) Total cost = 3M, Labor = 2M, NS

2) Profit >= Labor, NS

1) and 2) Profit >= 2M, therefore profit must be at least 2M/(2M+M+2M)*$500,000 = 2/5*$500,000, therefore profit >= $200,000. Sufficient.
User avatar
asch13
Joined: 03 Jun 2010
Last visit: 10 Sep 2010
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Posts: 12
Kudos: 197
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dauntingmcgee
My solution:

1) Total cost = 3M, Labor = 2M, NS

2) Profit >= Labor, NS

1) and 2) Profit >= 2M, therefore profit must be at least 2M/(2M+M+2M)*$500,000 = 2/5*$500,000, therefore profit >= $200,000. Sufficient.

Could you please explain why profit must be at least 2M/(2M+M+2M)*500,000?
User avatar
dauntingmcgee
Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Last visit: 17 Aug 2010
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
35
 [3]
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 15
Kudos: 35
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Gladly.

Since from:

1) we know that Labor (L) = 2 * Materials (M), and
2) we know that Profit (P) >= L
1) and 2) combined show that P >= 2M

There are only three components of the $500,000: P, L and M, so P+L+M = $500,000. The minimum amount of P is the case that P = L = 2M. In order to find what fraction P is of P+L+M we simply take \(P/(P+M+L) = 2M/(2M+M+2M) = 2M/5M = 2/5\). Now that we know what fraction of the $500,000 is P, we simply multiply 2/5 * $500,000 to get $200,000. Sufficient.
User avatar
fluke
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Last visit: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 1,107
Own Kudos:
4,836
 [2]
Given Kudos: 376
Posts: 1,107
Kudos: 4,836
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Total budget = 500

Is profit > 150

Or is expenditure < 350

1) Total cost = Material+Labor
T = M+L
T = 3M
3M = M+L
2M = L

Labor cost is twice that of material.

If M=1, L=2; T=3. Expenditure < 350. Yes
M=150; L=300; T=450; Expenditure > 350. No.
Not sufficient.

2) Company's Profit P>L
M=0; L=249; P=251. Expenditure <350. Yes
M=399; L=1; P=100. Expenditure <350. No.
Not sufficient.

Combining 1 and 2;
T=M+L=L/2+L
T=(3/2)L
P=500-T=500-(3/2)L
P=500-(3/2)L
P>L
500-(3/2)L>L
500>(5/2)L
(5/2)L<500
L<200
Since M is half L. M should be <100
Even if we consider maximum of these;
Total maximum expenditure = 200+100=300<350.
Thus profit will always be >150.

Ans: "C"
avatar
massivelavs
Joined: 22 Nov 2011
Last visit: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
8
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: United States
Schools: Carroll '15
GMAT Date: 01-12-2012
GPA: 3.17
WE:Sales (Finance: Investment Banking)
Schools: Carroll '15
Posts: 5
Kudos: 8
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
when you combine
TC (total cost)= 3m (material)
TC= L (labor) + m = 3m so L=2M

500-TC>2m (aka L)
500>5m
m<100

500 - less then 300= greater then 200k

C
User avatar
shinbhu
Joined: 29 Jul 2011
Last visit: 14 Oct 2013
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
167
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Location: United States
Posts: 52
Kudos: 167
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rephrase: 500K - [L+M] >= 150K
L+M <= 350K?

1. L+M = 3M => L = 2M. No info on M or L values, insuff.
2. L < 150K. M=? insuff

Together, L<150K, which means M<75K, which implies that the labor cost is 3M<3x75K=225K. Obviously, this means that profit > 150K. Suff.
User avatar
ak1802
Joined: 26 May 2013
Last visit: 12 Jul 2018
Posts: 77
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 77
Kudos: 65
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi all. Bumping this topic because I didn't find an adequate answer explanation.

Here's mine:

Given :

Profit = 500,000 - TC

TC = L + M

St. 1: (N.S.)

TC = 3M
3M = L + M
2M = L

St. 2: (N.S.)

P > L , since L = 2M , Profit > 2M

Both Statements:

P = 500,000 - 3M [TC = 3M from st. 1]
2M = 500,000 - 3M [P > L , P > 2M ] . Substitute 2M into the profit formula, knowing that the Profit number must be greater than 2M.

solve for M: ... M = $100,000. Plug into profit formula :

2($100,000) = $500,000 - 3($100,000)

Profit > $200,000

Answer choice C.
avatar
Worksmart
Joined: 17 May 2016
Last visit: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
3
 [2]
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi all. I’m not very good at mathy explanations (more of a verbal guy), but I got this question right first time in about 2 minutes. Here is my logic to it:

The question stem tells us that the company was paid $500k for the project, and states that only labor and material are the costs. It then asks if the company’s profit is greater than 150k. Another way of thinking of that is asking if the costs were greater than $350k. (Since $500k payment – $350k cost = $150k profit)

Statement 1 tells us that the ratio of total cost to cost of material is 3 to 1. Because the question stem states the only other cost is labor, we know that the ratio of labor cost to material cost is 2:1. For every dollar of material there is 2 dollars of labor. Not sufficient on its own.

Statement 2 tells us the company profit is greater than its cost of labor. An important part of that is that it means profit is indeed a positive number! Not sufficient on its own.

With the statements combined we know that profit is greater than labor, and the ratio of labor to material is 2:1.
The limit ends up being $200k profit, $200k labor, and $100k materials. The company’s actual costs have to be lower than this limit. Even the limit only has $300k of cost, which is much lower than $350k as asked in the question stem.

Answer is C.
User avatar
devbond
Joined: 26 May 2014
Last visit: 25 May 2017
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
567
 [2]
Given Kudos: 17
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Converting the question into equations is the key to solving this question under two mins.

What does the question stem say -> Cost (C) = Labour ( L ) + Material ( M )

Cost = 500 ( dividing by 1000, makes the calculations appear less daunting )

Is Profit > 150 ?

What is profit ? -> Money Earned - Money Spent

Money Earned is -> 500

So Profit ( P) = 500 - C

Now, Rephrasing the question stem,
Is 500 - C > 150
which means, Is C < 350 ?

Now, lets look at both the options.

A) C=3M

No numerical given, so there is no way to ascertain the answer to our main question.

B) Profit is > Cost of Labour -- Which in mathematical terms, means the following

500 - C > L

now as we already know that C= L + M, L= C -M

Substituting,

500 -C > C - M ,

500 > 2C - M ( Again no numerical value available to prove C< 350 )

Now , Lets combine A and B

500 >2C - M and C= 3M,

Lets get everything in terms of C as our main question is in terms of C.

500 > 2C - C/3 ,

This gives us -- > C < 300 , which is sufficient to answer our main question , Is C< 350 .

Answer is C.
User avatar
energetics
Joined: 05 Feb 2018
Last visit: 09 Oct 2020
Posts: 304
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 325
Posts: 304
Kudos: 858
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
asch13
A construction company was paid a total of $500,000 for a construction project. The company's only costs for the project were for labor and materials. Was the company's profit greater than $150,000?

(1) The company's total cost was three times its cost for materials.
P = 500 - C
C = m + l
C = 3m
We can deduce that l = 2m, but still have no value for P = 500 - 3m
Not sufficient

(2) The company's profit was greater than its cost for labor
P > l
Not sufficient

Together, We know P > l and that l = 2m
So P > 2m
We can use this (remembering that LHS is greater) 2m > 500 - 3m
5m > 500
m > 100
Since we know P > 2m, P > 200 so we can say yes to the question P>150?
avatar
ShivamoggaGaganhs
Joined: 06 May 2019
Last visit: 23 Jan 2021
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 132
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
Posts: 23
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
furersingh2
Joined: 12 Jan 2022
Last visit: 29 Apr 2022
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 2
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Total cost =C
Material cost = M
Labor cost = M
C=L+M
1st statement
The company's total cost was three times its cost for materials.
C=3M
L = C-M= 3M-M = 2M
not sufficient

2nd statement
The company's profit was greater than its cost for labor
P>L
No information about cost for material
not sufficient

Both statements combined
P=500-C=500-3M
P>L => P>2M
multiple 3/2 on both sides
3/2P>3M
3/2(500-C)>C
1500-3C>2C
1500>5C
300>C
Hence total cost is less than 300, so profit is more than 200
Sufficient

Hope it is helpful

Thank you

Aryan Chandel
8169397962
User avatar
Paras10
Joined: 31 Jan 2022
Last visit: 12 Mar 2023
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 154
Posts: 5
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
then
2m < 200
so p can be
2m < p < 150 < 200 or 2m < 150 < p < 200

how is this sufficient ? i dont get it

Bunuel
asch13
A construction company was paid a total of $500,000 for a construction project. The company's only costs for the project were for labor and materials. Was the company's profit greater than $150,000?

(1) The company's total cost was three times its cost for materials.

(2) The company's profit was greater than its cost for labor

Given: \(c=l+m\)
Question is \(p=500-c>150\) true?

(1) \(c=3m\) --> is \(500-3m>150\) true? --> is \(m<\frac{350}{3}\approx{117}\) true? Not sufficient.

(2) \(500-(l+m)>l\) --> \(500>2l+m\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Question became is \(m<\frac{350}{3}\approx{117}\) true? From (1) \(c=l+m=3m\) --> \(l=2m\). From (2) \(500>2l+m=4m+m=5m\) --> \(m<100\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 31 Dec 1969
Posts: 96,505
Own Kudos:
673,789
 [1]
Given Kudos: 87,899
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 96,505
Kudos: 673,789
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paras10
then
2m < 200
so p can be
2m < p < 150 < 200 or 2m < 150 < p < 200

how is this sufficient ? i dont get it

Bunuel
asch13
A construction company was paid a total of $500,000 for a construction project. The company's only costs for the project were for labor and materials. Was the company's profit greater than $150,000?

(1) The company's total cost was three times its cost for materials.

(2) The company's profit was greater than its cost for labor

Given: \(c=l+m\)
Question is \(p=500-c>150\) true?

(1) \(c=3m\) --> is \(500-3m>150\) true? --> is \(m<\frac{350}{3}\approx{117}\) true? Not sufficient.

(2) \(500-(l+m)>l\) --> \(500>2l+m\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) Question became is \(m<\frac{350}{3}\approx{117}\) true? From (1) \(c=l+m=3m\) --> \(l=2m\). From (2) \(500>2l+m=4m+m=5m\) --> \(m<100\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.

I have edited the solution by adding more details to enhance its clarity. I hope it is now easier to understand.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 35,345
Own Kudos:
Posts: 35,345
Kudos: 902
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderator:
Math Expert
96505 posts