A consulting firm tracks performance metrics for eight regional office

Question

A consulting firm tracks performance metrics for eight regional offices, four in each of two geographic regions (East and West). The following table contains these metrics for calendar year 2019. This firm hires consultants for its regional offices on a calendar-year basis, so the number of consultants employed at each office listed did not change at any point during 2019.

2019 Regional Office Performance Data

Office  
  Region  
  Consultants  
  Projects   Completed  
  Average Project   Revenue ($k)  
  Total   Costs ($M)  
  Client   Satisfaction (%)   
 
  A 
 West 
 42 
 115 
 86 
 7.9 
 91 
 
  B 
 East 
 35 
 104 
 93 
 7.4 
 88 
 
  C 
 West 
 51 
 135 
 79 
 9.8 
 94 
 
  D 
 East 
 28 
 96 
 102 
 7.1 
 85 
 
  E 
 East 
 47 
 122 
 89 
 8.6 
 92 
 
  F 
 East 
 39 
 110 
 90 
 8.1 
 90 
 
  G 
 West 
 33 
 89 
 95 
 6.2 
 87 
 
  H 
 West 
 44 
 120 
 84 
 8.5 
 93

For each of the following statements, select  Yes  if the information accurately reflects the information in the table. Otherwise, select  No .

Bunuel · Answer

Similar questions based on the same table:
https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-consulting ... 55422.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-consulting ... 55421.html
https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-consulting ... 54883.html

Edskore · Answer

Good Graphs and Tables (G&T) question — this one tests your ability to extract numbers, calculate derived values, and compare. Let me work through each statement.

Key concept: Multi-Statement Table Interpretation — calculating values not directly in the table (profit, ratios, ranked subsets).

The full data table gives us:
A: 42 consultants, 115 projects, $86k avg revenue, $7.9M costs, 91% satisfaction
B: 35 / 104 / $93k / $7.4M / 88%
C: 51 / 135 / $79k / $9.8M / 94%
D: 28 / 96 / $102k / $7.1M / 85%
E: 47 / 122 / $89k / $8.6M / 92%
F: 39 / 110 / $90k / $8.1M / 90%
G: 33 / 89 / $95k / $6.2M / 87%
H: 44 / 120 / $84k / $8.5M / 93%

Statement 1 — Compare total revenue for top-4 vs. bottom-4 by satisfaction.
Sorted by satisfaction (lowest to highest): D(85), G(87), B(88), F(90), A(91), E(92), H(93), C(94)
Bottom 4: D, G, B, F | Top 4: A, E, H, C

Total project revenue = Projects × Avg Revenue
Bottom 4: D=(96×102)=9,792 + G=(89×95)=8,455 + B=(104×93)=9,672 + F=(110×90)=9,900 = 37,819 ($k)
Top 4: A=(115×86)=9,890 + E=(122×89)=10,858 + H=(120×84)=10,080 + C=(135×79)=10,665 = 41,493 ($k)

41,493 > 37,819 → Statement 1: YES

Statement 2 — Average profit per consultant: Office A vs. E
Profit = Total Revenue − Total Costs
Office A: Revenue = 9,890k = $9.89M; Costs = $7.9M; Profit = $1.99M; Per consultant = $1.99M/42 ≈ $47,400
Office E: Revenue = 10,858k = $10.858M; Costs = $8.6M; Profit = $2.258M; Per consultant = $2.258M/47 ≈ $48,000

E's average profit per consultant (~$48k) is slightly higher than A's (~$47.4k). A is NOT greater. → Statement 2: NO

Common trap: Students often only compare raw profits ($1.99M vs $2.258M) and forget to divide by consultants. E has more consultants too, so you must do the full ratio.

Statement 3 — Ratio of total revenue to total cost: A vs. E
Revenue/Cost ratio A = $9.89M / $7.9M ≈ 1.252
Revenue/Cost ratio E = $10.858M / $8.6M ≈ 1.263

A's ratio (1.252) < E's ratio (1.263). A is NOT greater. → Statement 3: NO

Final answers: YES / NO / NO

Takeaway: For math-heavy G&T questions, build a quick derived-values column before tackling statements — it saves re-doing calculations and reduces careless errors under time pressure.

AnushkaKala · Answer

Hey, I didn't understand statement 3's calculation. how is A's revenue $9.89M and E's revenue $10.858M?

Gmat860sanskar · Answer

Hello Anushka,

so here we were given Average cost per project for A which is 86k and total project they have completed is 115. So total revenue will be 
86 * 115 = 9,890 = $9.9 million. In same way for E, 89 * 122 =10,858 = $10.8 million

I hope this helps you.

RonPurewal · Answer

Official Explanation:

A consulting firm tracks performance metrics for eight regional offices, four in each of two geographic regions (East and West). The following table contains these metrics for calendar year 2019. This firm hires consultants for its regional offices on a calendar-year basis, so the number of consultants employed at each office listed did not change at any point during 2019.

2019 Regional Office Performance Data

Office	Region	Consultants	Projects Completed	Average Project Revenue ($k)	Total Costs ($M)	Client Satisfaction (%)
A	West	42	115	86	7.9	91
B	East	35	104	93	7.4	88
C	West	51	135	79	9.8	94
D	East	28	96	102	7.1	85
E	East	47	122	89	8.6	92
F	East	39	110	90	8.1	90
G	West	33	89	95	6.2	87
H	West	44	120	84	8.5	93

For each of the following statements, select Yes if the information accurately reflects the information in the table. Otherwise, select No.

Part I: The total project revenue for each office is the product of Average Project Revenue and Projects Completed.

The four offices ranking above median on client satisfaction percentage will just be the four highest-ranking offices on that metric: C, H, E, and A. Taking the above product for each of these and adding them together gives $41371 thousand = $41.371 million.

The four offices ranking below median on client satisfaction percentage will just be the four lowest-ranking offices on that metric: D, G, B, and F. Taking the above product for each of these and adding them together gives $37819 thousand = $37.819 million.

The value is higher for the four offices at the top of the client satisfaction ranking, so this statement is true; the answer to the first part is Yes.

Part II:

Average Profit per Consultant can be calculated from the table as
(Total Profit) / (Number of Consultants)
=(Total Revenue – Total Costs) / (Number of Consultants)
=[(Revenue per Project)(# Projects) – Total Costs] / (# Consultants)

WARNING! You can’t do the subtraction step until the revenues and costs are in matching units—both $thousands or both $millions. (It’s easier to use all $thousands. Don’t forget to multiply every value in the Total Costs column by 1000!)

The results are[
A ≈ $47,381 (47.381 thousand)
E ≈ $48,043 (48.043 thousand)
The average profit per consultant is greater for office E than for office A, so the answer to the second part is No.

Part III:
Total Revenue/Cost Ratio is calculated as follows:
Revenue/Cost Ratio
=Total Revenue / Total Cost
=(Revenue per Project)(# Projects) / Total Cost
The results are
A ≈ 1.252
E ≈ 1.263
This ratio is greater for office E than for office A, so the answer to the final part is No.

Show Spoiler

Attachment:

GMAT-Club-Forum-si80jsl3.png [ 33.46 KiB | Viewed 442 times ]

egmat · Answer

Hi AnushkaKala,

Great question! The total project revenue isn't directly listed in the table — you have to calculate it by multiplying two columns together:

Total Project Revenue = Projects Completed × Avg Project Revenue ($k)

For Office A: 
- Projects Completed =  115 
- Avg Project Revenue =  $86k 
- Total Revenue =  115  ×  $86k  =  $9,890k  =  $9.89M

For Office E: 
- Projects Completed =  122 
- Avg Project Revenue =  $89k 
- Total Revenue =  122  ×  $89k  =  $10,858k  =  $10.858M

That's where those numbers come from. The table gives you the average revenue per project and the number of projects, so you simply multiply to get the total.

This derived total revenue is then used for S2 and S3:

S2 (Profit per consultant): 
- Office A: Profit =  $9.89M  -  $7.9M  =  $1.99M  →  $1.99M  /  42  consultants = ~ $47.4k  per consultant
- Office E: Profit =  $10.858M  -  $8.6M  =  $2.258M  →  $2.258M  /  47  consultants = ~ $48.0k  per consultant
- Office E is higher, so the answer is  No .

S3 (Revenue-to-cost ratio): 
- Office A:  $9.89M  /  $7.9M  = ~ 1.252 
- Office E:  $10.858M  /  $8.6M  = ~ 1.263 
- Office E is higher again, so the answer is  No .

Key Takeaway:  Whenever you see 'Avg Project Revenue' and 'Projects Completed' as separate columns, multiply them to get Total Project Revenue.  This is a  classic TA move  — the table doesn't hand you the number directly, but gives you the pieces to compute it.

Answer: Yes, No, No

Yes	No
		The total project revenue for 2019 for the four offices ranking above the median client satisfaction percentage, combined, was greater than that for the four offices ranking below the median client satisfaction percentage, combined.
		The average profit per consultant for 2019 was greater for office A than for office E.
		The ratio of total revenue to total cost for 2019 was greater for office A than for office E.

A consulting firm tracks performance metrics for eight regional office

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Graphs and Tables (G&T) Questions

A consulting firm tracks performance metrics for eight regional office

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards