A convenience store manager noticed that a cooler which had

Question

A convenience store manager noticed that a cooler which had been stocked with only a cola product and an iced-tea product had 15 colas left at the end of the day but only 3 iced-tea beverages. As a result, the manager reasoned that he should increase the amount of iced tea and decrease the amount of cola he ordered from the distributor.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the manager's rationale for ordering more iced tea and less cola?

a. The cooler in question is the only place in the store where the cola and iced tea beverages are stocked.

b. On that day, a month-long $1,000,000 sweepstakes began, with prizes awarded via the bottlecaps on the iced tea beverage.

c. At the beginning of the day, the cooler was stocked with at least as many of the iced tea beverages as of the cola beverages.

d. On the subsequent day, the remaining three iced tea beverages all sold within the first hour after the store opened.

e. During that week, a special "buy one, get one free" sale was in effect for the cola beverage.

GyanOne · Answer

(A): This is irrelevant. 
(B): This actually weakens the manager's rationale. If there were prizes on offer for buying the iced-tea, then this, rather than real demand, could have pushed up the sales of iced tea. 
(C): Correct. If there were an equal number of iced teas and colas to begin with, then a smaller number of iced teas being left at the end of the day points to greater demand for iced tea. 
(D): This is irrelevant. 
(E): This does strengthen the rationale, but C is better and more conclusive.

C it is.

GMATPill · Answer

1) Challenge Question: "How is it that he should increased iced tea orders from distributor?"
Answer: He is trying to say that he sold more iced-teas than colas so he should rebalance.

How do I strengthen this supporting leg?
--- help answer / explain exactly how iced teas sold more..

(C) gives us information that can let us show that iced tea sold more. What information did it give? That they were equally stocked in the beginning, and iced tea my have had even more in stock than cola yet it depleted more than cola. The "at least" equal stocking helps us get the information and lead us to conclude that more iced teas were sold. This helps strengthen argument by better clarifying our support leg.

amablema · Answer

I disagree with the OA, What do you think?

A convenience store manager noticed that a cooler which had been stocked with only a cola product and an iced-tea product had 15 colas left at the end of the day but only 3 iced-tea beverages. As a result, the manager reasoned that he should increase the amount of iced tea and decrease the amount of cola he ordered from the distributor.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the manager's rationale for ordering more iced tea and less cola?

a. The cooler in question is the only place in the store where the cola and iced tea beverages are stocked.
b. On that day, a month-long $1,000,000 sweepstakes began, with prizes awarded via the bottlecaps on the iced tea beverage.
c. At the beginning of the day, the cooler was stocked with at least as many of the iced tea beverages as of the cola beverages.
d. On the subsequent day, the remaining three iced tea beverages all sold within the first hour after the store opened.
e. During that week, a special "buy one, get one free" sale was in effect for the cola beverage.

gmatprep2011 · Answer

Pre-thinking the answer is important.

abhishekdadarwal2009 · Answer

Show timer Statistics 
A convenience store manager noticed that a cooler which had been stocked with only a cola product and an iced-tea product had 15 colas left at the end of the day but only 3 iced-tea beverages. As a result, the manager reasoned that he should increase the amount of iced tea and decrease the amount of cola he ordered from the distributor.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the manager's rationale for ordering more iced tea and less cola?

a. The cooler in question is the only place in the store where the cola and iced tea beverages are stocked. 
the argument says that the manager will buy more bottles from the distributor that means thet buying or selling is only from the store and not anyother place,about the cooler since it is the only source of sale mentioned then we take it as true.
 b. On that day, a month-long $1,000,000 sweepstakes began, with prizes awarded via the bottlecaps on the iced tea beverage. 
weakens the argument.
 c. At the beginning of the day, the cooler was stocked with at least as many of the iced tea beverages as of the cola beverages. 
THe correct answer because the argument will only stand true if the number of bottles of iced tea are equal to the number of bottles of cola.
 d. On the subsequent day, the remaining three iced tea beverages all sold within the first hour after the store opened. 
Out of Scope
 e. During that week, a special "buy one, get one free" sale was in effect for the cola beverage. 
strengthens the argument but it cannot be the main supporting point it may add on since we have a stronger option available.

Ankia · Answer

Option B does not weaken the manager's rationale:
If there were prizes on offer for buying the iced-tea, and the offer pushed up the sales of iced tea, then it is foreseeable that customers would continue to be enticed by this offer, and thereby purchase more in the subsequent days.

However, C is a better option since it deals directly with the manager's rationale.

jaisonsunny77 · Answer

This question beautifully deals with the concept of percentages in an indirect way.

The basic structure of this question is as follows:

Two types of beverages: Iced tea and Cola. 
Both beverages stored in the same location
At the end of the day, 15 colas were left, while only 3 Iced teas were left.

Conclusion: Order more Iced tea

The passage jumps straight to the conclusion that the manager ordered more iced tea.   The manager's decision would only make sense if the number of bottles ordered for both these products were the same.   
For example: Assume that 100 bottles were ordered for both iced tea and colas. At the end of the day, the store was left with 15 bottles of cola but only 3 bottles of iced tea. This literally means that the store sold more iced tea bottles than cola bottles. Only under such a circumstance would the manager's decision seem rational.

Let's consider a parallel situation where the number of bottles ordered was not the same: Assume that only 10 Iced tea bottles were ordered whereas 100 bottles of cola was ordered. At the end of the day, 3 iced tea bottles remain whereas 15 cola bottles remain. This means that the store sold 70% of it's iced tea bottles while the store sold 85% of its cola bottles. In this case, even though a higher number of cola bottles were left out, the store was still able to sell more cola bottles than iced tea bottles. Hence, under this circumstance, it would be irrational for the manager to continue ordering more iced tea bottles than cola bottles.

As you can see, the argument can be strengthened if we assume that the number of bottles ordered for both categories of drinks were the same. So, the right answer choice would describe exactly this (what's  mentioned in blue ).

Let's analyze the available choices:

a.  The cooler in question is the only place in the store where the cola and iced tea beverages are stocked.  - Knowing where the products were stocked still does nothing to help us compare the number of bottles sold (for iced tea and cola). This option is therefore irrelevant to this question. Hence,  eliminate (A).

b.  On that day, a month-long $1,000,000 sweepstakes began, with prizes awarded via the bottlecaps on the iced tea beverage.  - this may help explain the reason why one customer would end up buying an iced tea bottle. but knowing the customer's motivation (to purchase iced tea) does nothing to help us compare the number of bottles sold. Hence,  eliminate (B)

c.  At the beginning of the day, the cooler was stocked with at least as many of the iced tea beverages as of the cola beverages.  - BINGO. Now we know that the sample sizes were the same; this leaves no room for counter interpretations. hence,   (C) is the right answer.  
 
d.  On the subsequent day, the remaining three iced tea beverages all sold within the first hour after the store opened.  - What about the remaining cola beverages? were these cola bottle still unsold within the first hour of the subsequent day? Without knowing this, we cannot justify the purchase of more iced tea bottles. Hence,  eliminate (D).

e.  During that week, a special "buy one, get one free" sale was in effect for the cola beverage.   - Even after considering the fact that a sale was in place for the cola bottles, it still does not help us understand whether ordering more iced tea bottles was a rational decision or not. What if more cola bottles were sold as a result of this sale? what if iced tea bottles were sold off the rack without having the need to implement a sale? Since this option leaves a room of doubt,  eliminate (E).

A convenience store manager noticed that a cooler which had

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

A convenience store manager noticed that a cooler which had

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards