It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 05:09

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

1 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 524

Kudos [?]: 70 [1], given: 0

Location: US
A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2005, 10:14
1
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

69% (00:56) correct 31% (01:00) wrong based on 317 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the lawsuit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singers' services cost more than those of their imitators.

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer rendition of a song from a good imitator's rendition of the same song.
(B) Commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singers.
(C) The original versions of some well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials.
(D) Advertising firms will continue to use imitators to mimic the physical mannerisms of famous singers.
(E) The advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercials.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 70 [1], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Posts: 1050

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 0

Location: CA
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2005, 18:40
My answer is E

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 793

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2005, 19:07
E it is.
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1699

Kudos [?]: 480 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Nov 2005, 20:36
yup got E as well.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 480 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Nov 2005
Posts: 12

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2005, 00:14
1
This post received
KUDOS
For the benefit of the forum readers, I guess it will be better that we put in our explanation for our answer choice.

Negate (E) The advertising industry will NOT use well-known renditions of songs in commercials.

This will weaken the conclusion "advertising costs will rise, since famous singers’ services cost more than those of their imitators". Since well-known renditions of songs are not used in commercials, the advertising cost will NOT rise.

Answer is E.

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 498

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2005, 00:38
I Vote for E.

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 Apr 2005
Posts: 206

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2005, 09:16
One more E.

Agree with sonix bluefish's explanation. :)

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 10 Oct 2005
Posts: 524

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

Location: US
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Nov 2005, 09:23
OA is E.

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2009, 08:29
A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer’s well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the lawsuit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singers’ services cost more than those of their imitators.
The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer’s rendition of a song from a good imitator’s rendition of the same song.
(B) Commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singers.
(C) The original versions of some well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials.
(D) Advertising firms will continue to use imitators to mimic the physical mannerisms of famous singers.
(E) The advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercials.

Please explain your answers, especially the 2 contenders.

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Posts: 1402

Kudos [?]: 443 [0], given: 1

Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2009, 08:43
ConkergMat wrote:
A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer’s well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the lawsuit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singers’ services cost more than those of their imitators.
The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer’s rendition of a song from a good imitator’s rendition of the same song.
(B) Commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using imitators of famous singers.
(C) The original versions of some well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials.
(D) Advertising firms will continue to use imitators to mimic the physical mannerisms of famous singers.
(E) The advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercials.

Please explain your answers, especially the 2 contenders.


The only one that made sense is E.

Conc is "advertising costs will rise, since famous singers’ services cost more than those of their imitators"

Negate E

The advertising industry will NOT use well-known renditions of songs in commercials. If they do not use the well known renditions of songs, there is no guarantee that the cost of advertising will go up.

Kudos [?]: 443 [0], given: 1

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 727

Kudos [?]: 864 [0], given: 99

Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2009, 09:23
clear E.

A can come close but E stands out clear.

Kudos [?]: 864 [0], given: 99

Expert Post
GMAT Tutor
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1339

Kudos [?]: 1997 [0], given: 6

Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2009, 09:36
Certainly E, for the reasons given above. The conclusion is that 'advertising costs will rise' because advertisers will pay more for songs, and if advertisers stop using songs altogether, the argument falls apart.

Curious where the question is from - surely it's based on Tom Waits' real life lawsuit against Frito-Lay?
_________________

GMAT Tutor in Toronto

If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

Kudos [?]: 1997 [0], given: 6

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Dec 2008
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2009, 10:16
Thanks...Guys...
I just goofed on that one. Was probably a 600 level one.

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 727

Kudos [?]: 864 [0], given: 99

Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2009, 10:40
Some times if you are at the end of the exam and running out of time, then there is high chance to miss this kind of questions.If we solve in little relaxed environment like this(forum), ya the probability is lot higher to get it right...

Kudos [?]: 864 [0], given: 99

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 487

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 13

Schools: Kellogg, MIT, Michigan, Berkeley, Marshall, Mellon
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2009, 13:19
Hi mates,

although I picked A, E seems to be the right one...

OA?

I think this question is from OG11, isn't it?

Cheers
_________________

mates, please visit my profile and leave comments
http://gmatclub.com/forum/johnlewis1980-s-profile-feedback-is-more-than-welcome-80538.html

I'm not linked to GMAT questions anymore, so, if you need something, please PM me

I'm already focused on my application package :)

My experience in my second attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/p544312#p544312
My experience in my third attempt
http://gmatclub.com/forum/630-q-47-v-28-engineer-non-native-speaker-my-experience-78215.html#p588275

Kudos [?]: 57 [0], given: 13

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1791

Kudos [?]: 1088 [0], given: 5

Location: New York
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2009, 19:12
agree with E
_________________

Your attitude determines your altitude
Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Kudos [?]: 1088 [0], given: 5

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1878

Kudos [?]: 1443 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2009, 19:39
Reasoning: famous singers’ services cost more than those of their imitators.

A. the ability to distinguish the famous song and the imitator's does not answer why the advertising cost will rise, A out
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1443 [0], given: 1

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2009, 19:44
OA is E
it comes from the purple cover of OG 11, no.13 in CR

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1791

Kudos [?]: 1088 [0], given: 5

Location: New York
Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2009, 19:45
sondenso wrote:
Reasoning: famous singers’ services cost more than those of their imitators.

A. the ability to distinguish the famous song and the imitator's does not answer why the advertising cost will rise, A out


Sorry I meant E..typo..
_________________

Your attitude determines your altitude
Smiling wins more friends than frowning

Kudos [?]: 1088 [0], given: 5

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2009
Posts: 163

Kudos [?]: 259 [0], given: 64

Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Jul 2010, 03:55
A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an advertising firm for using another singer in a commercial to evoke the famous singer’s well-known rendition of a certain song. As a result of the lawsuit, advertising firms will stop using imitators in commercials. Therefore, advertising costs will rise, since famous singers’ services cost more than those of their imitators.

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?
(A) Most people are unable to distinguish a famous singer’s rendition of a song from a good
imitator’s rendition of the same song.
(B) Commercials using famous singers are usually more effective than commercials using
imitators of famous singers.
(C) The original versions of some well-known songs are unavailable for use in commercials.
(D) Advertising firms will continue to use imitators to mimic the physical mannerisms of famous singers.
(E) The advertising industry will use well-known renditions of songs in commercials.
_________________

But there’s something in me that just keeps going on. I think it has something to do with tomorrow, that there is always one, and that everything can change when it comes.
http://aimingformba.blogspot.com

Kudos [?]: 259 [0], given: 64

Re: A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an   [#permalink] 23 Jul 2010, 03:55

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 35 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

A famous singer recently won a lawsuit against an

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.