Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 1912:00 PM PDT
-01:00 PM PDT
Scoring 329 on the GRE is not always about using more books, more courses, or a longer study plan. In this episode of GRE Success Talks, Ashutosh shares his GRE preparation strategy, study plan, and test-day experience, explaining how he kept his prep....
May 1501:00 PM IST
-11:00 AM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.
May 2008:00 AM PDT
-08:30 AM PDT
What’s in it for you- Live Profile Evaluation Chat Session with Jenifer Turtschanow, CEO, ARINGO. Come with your details prepared and ARINGO will share insights! Pre-MBA Role/Industry, YOE, Exam Score, C/GPA, ECs Post-MBA Role/ Industry & School List.- Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
01 Jul 2022, 07:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
Question 1
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
49% (02:40) correct
51%
(03:06) wrong
based on 192
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 2
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
84% (00:43) correct 16%
(01:16) wrong
based on 180
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 3
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
88% (00:38) correct 12%
(00:39) wrong
based on 183
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 4
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
52% (00:44) correct 48%
(00:36) wrong
based on 182
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 5
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
68% (00:40) correct 32%
(00:47) wrong
based on 180
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Question 6
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
75% (00:59) correct 25%
(01:21) wrong
based on 169
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
A gene that keeps switchgrass forever young could have far-reaching implications for the development of the plant as a biofuel crop, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) scientists.
Inserting a specific gene called corngrass from corn into switchgrass essentially keeps the perennial grass in its juvenile form—a plant that doesn’t flower, doesn’t produce seeds, and doesn’t have a dormant growth phase. Because of these changes, the sugars making up the plant starch are more readily available for conversion into cellulosic ethanol.
According to Agricultural Research Service (ARS) geneticist Sarah Hake, the starch in these transgenic plants stays inside the stem because it isn’t needed elsewhere for nourishing flower buds and blossoms. As a result, starch levels can increase as much as 250%, which increases the sugars that can be fermented into ethanol.
Hake, director of the ARS Plant Gene Expression Center in Albany, CA, teamed with University of California–Berkeley plant geneticist George Chuck to conduct this investigation. ARS is the USDA’s chief intramural scientific research agency, and this work supports the USDA priority of developing new sources of bioenergy.
The scientists observed that the leaves in the transgenic switchgrass are not nearly as stiff as leaves in switchgrass cultivars that haven’t been modified. In addition, they determined that leaf lignin is slightly different in the transgenic switchgrass than leaf lignin in other plants. This could lead to new findings on how to break down the sturdy lignin and release sugars for fermentation, a development that will be essential to the commercial production of cellulosic ethanol.
The researchers are now introducing DNA segments called genetic promoters that would “turn on” the expression of the corngrass gene in aboveground switchgrass shoots. This could help increase root mass development that otherwise would be inhibited by the gene. Hake and Chuck also suggest that developing nonflowering switchgrass varieties would eliminate the possibility of cross-pollination between transgenic switchgrass cultivars and other switchgrass cultivars.
Inserting a specific gene called corngrass from corn into switchgrass essentially keeps the perennial grass in its juvenile form—a plant that doesn’t flower, doesn’t produce seeds, and doesn’t have a dormant growth phase. Because of these changes, the sugars making up the plant starch are more readily available for conversion into cellulosic ethanol.
According to Agricultural Research Service (ARS) geneticist Sarah Hake, the starch in these transgenic plants stays inside the stem because it isn’t needed elsewhere for nourishing flower buds and blossoms. As a result, starch levels can increase as much as 250%, which increases the sugars that can be fermented into ethanol.
Hake, director of the ARS Plant Gene Expression Center in Albany, CA, teamed with University of California–Berkeley plant geneticist George Chuck to conduct this investigation. ARS is the USDA’s chief intramural scientific research agency, and this work supports the USDA priority of developing new sources of bioenergy.
The scientists observed that the leaves in the transgenic switchgrass are not nearly as stiff as leaves in switchgrass cultivars that haven’t been modified. In addition, they determined that leaf lignin is slightly different in the transgenic switchgrass than leaf lignin in other plants. This could lead to new findings on how to break down the sturdy lignin and release sugars for fermentation, a development that will be essential to the commercial production of cellulosic ethanol.
The researchers are now introducing DNA segments called genetic promoters that would “turn on” the expression of the corngrass gene in aboveground switchgrass shoots. This could help increase root mass development that otherwise would be inhibited by the gene. Hake and Chuck also suggest that developing nonflowering switchgrass varieties would eliminate the possibility of cross-pollination between transgenic switchgrass cultivars and other switchgrass cultivars.
1. The following are all side effects of the modified switchgrass EXCEPT:
a. stiffer leaves
b. infertility
c. dormant growth
d. inability to flower
e. higher sugar levels
a. stiffer leaves
b. infertility
c. dormant growth
d. inability to flower
e. higher sugar levels
2. The passage suggests that the development of transgenic switchgrass will
a. eliminate the need to farm corn.
b. support the USDA’s priority of finding alternative fuel sources.
c. strengthen the plant lignin.
d. introduce new DNA segments.
e. pit the Department of Agriculture against the Plant Gene Expression Center.
a. eliminate the need to farm corn.
b. support the USDA’s priority of finding alternative fuel sources.
c. strengthen the plant lignin.
d. introduce new DNA segments.
e. pit the Department of Agriculture against the Plant Gene Expression Center.
3. The passage’s primary function is to
a. criticize the work of an institution.
b. compare two possible solutions when only one is needed.
c. provide the outcome of a finished study.
d. optimistically deliver the findings of a study in progress.
e. eliminate assumptions that are not critical to the findings.
a. criticize the work of an institution.
b. compare two possible solutions when only one is needed.
c. provide the outcome of a finished study.
d. optimistically deliver the findings of a study in progress.
e. eliminate assumptions that are not critical to the findings.
4. Geneticist Sarah Hake heads the
a. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
b. University of California–Berkeley.
c. corngrass study.
d. Plant Gene Expression Center.
e. Agricultural Research Center.
a. U.S. Department of Agriculture.
b. University of California–Berkeley.
c. corngrass study.
d. Plant Gene Expression Center.
e. Agricultural Research Center.
5. Which of the following would be most interested in the study?
a. corn farmers
b. Orville Redenbacher
c. alternative energy car manufacturers
d. the president of the United States
e. DNA specialists
a. corn farmers
b. Orville Redenbacher
c. alternative energy car manufacturers
d. the president of the United States
e. DNA specialists
6. Which of the following inferences can be drawn based on the information provided in the passage?
a. The USDA has previously neglected its duty to prioritize the development of biofuels.
b. Our society is becoming more open to the idea of widespread use of genetically engineered products.
c. We will inevitably drain all our fuel sources, forcing the prioritization of the USDA to produce more.
d. The development of switchgrass can lead to a lot of promising uses from different avenues.
e. The cross-pollination of different variants of switchgrass is a little problem that could have devastating effects.
a. The USDA has previously neglected its duty to prioritize the development of biofuels.
b. Our society is becoming more open to the idea of widespread use of genetically engineered products.
c. We will inevitably drain all our fuel sources, forcing the prioritization of the USDA to produce more.
d. The development of switchgrass can lead to a lot of promising uses from different avenues.
e. The cross-pollination of different variants of switchgrass is a little problem that could have devastating effects.
RC Butler 2022 - Practice Two RC Passages Everyday.
Passage # 264 Date: 01-Jul-2022
This question is a part of RC Butler 2022. Click here for Details
Passage # 264 Date: 01-Jul-2022
This question is a part of RC Butler 2022. Click here for Details
03 Jul 2022, 23:39
Kudos
Bookmarks
1) In paragraph 5 it's mentioned directly , straightaway answer to the question.
2)In paragraph 4 in the last sentence its mentioned as developing new sources of bioenergy.
3)a. criticize the work of an institution. passage is not about criticizing.
b. compare two possible solutions when only one is needed. No comparison.
c. provide the outcome of a finished study. Study is in progress.
d. optimistically deliver the findings of a study in progress. CORRECT
e. eliminate assumptions that are not critical to the findings. No such elimination.
4)Clearly mentioned in the paragraph 4.
5)The crux of the passage is about any alternate bioenergy source
6)the whole passage is about the switchgrass development.
2)In paragraph 4 in the last sentence its mentioned as developing new sources of bioenergy.
3)a. criticize the work of an institution. passage is not about criticizing.
b. compare two possible solutions when only one is needed. No comparison.
c. provide the outcome of a finished study. Study is in progress.
d. optimistically deliver the findings of a study in progress. CORRECT
e. eliminate assumptions that are not critical to the findings. No such elimination.
4)Clearly mentioned in the paragraph 4.
5)The crux of the passage is about any alternate bioenergy source
6)the whole passage is about the switchgrass development.
