I think it's clear that neither (1) nor (2) is sufficient by itself. The geyser could spout three times on a given day as long as the time between two eruptions is less than 12 hours (24/(3-1)) but more than 6 hours (24/(3+1)).
Combining (1) and (2), we know that the geyser erupted six times in a two day period (48 hours). Thus the time between two eruptions must be between
48/7 (48/(6+1)) and
48/5 (48/(6-1)) hours. In other words, the interval between two eruptions is less than 9 hours and 36 minutes. Let's see how many eruptions there could be in the 7 day period starting tonight at midnight if the time between two eruptions was 9 hours and 30 minutes.
If the first eruption occured tonight at midnight, the (n+1)th occured n*9.5 hours afterwards. The 19th occured 18*9.5=171 hours afterwards. Since in 7 days there are 168 hours, only 18 eruptions would occur. So together, (1) and (2) are not sufficient.
OA=E
The clever way to conclude that the answer is E is to say: All I know from (1) and (2) is that the geyser erupts more than 2.5 times a day. If it erupts 2.5000001 times a day, what I saw in the 48 hours begininning the day before yesterday was a freakish occurence, and in a 7 period, I can expect either 17 or 18 erputions.
I'm not sure that this question is GMAT calibre, but the concepts behind it are important in the business word- what can be inferred from a sample. If my job were making real GMAT questions, I would include such questions.
Hey kevin what u said is absolutely fine.