Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
As per the statement the demand would be half if the cookies are getting produced in Buffalo. So, in Q2A, I agree the count for second year, but it will be 10000/2 = 5000 < 8000 (Min no. of boxes applied from Y2 of production), which is clearly violating the condition. Please do let me know if I'm getting anything wrong.
Apt0810
1)a)No,since in the first year itself the projection for each line is 6000 boxes per month so total sales for two existing units (with no new addition) =12000 boxes but capacity of Rochester is 12k boxes,so in 2nd year according to projected sales ,the sales will increase by 25% ,so total boxes to be produced would be >12k ,which won't be feasible for Rochester b)Yes,since Buffalo has a total capacity of 25k boxes per month so for the current value of production =6k*2 =12k boxes for existing units +2000 boxes *2 for new units = 16k for first year , In second year= 12k*1.25 +4000*2 boxes for new lines=23k,so fine and for 3rd year =15k*1.25 +6000*2=30750k..But all these values will be halved since in Buffalo the resource sharing is there so demand is already halved. c)No,,For Albany first year total =6000*2=12k boxes Second year = 12k*1.25+2000 boxes of oatmeal(since this is the first year of its introduction) = 17k boxes
2)a) Yes, Buffalo for second year with pessimistic growth and no new introduction= 4000*2= 8k boxes - For first year 8k*1.25= 10000 boxes - For second year all of which are <25k b) Yes, Rochester for 1st year with pessimistic growth and no new introductions= 4000*2 =8k boxes for first year< 12k boxes capacity of Rochester c)Yes,Albany for first year with pessimistic growth and introduction of chocolate cookies= 4000*2=8k boxes +2k boxes of chocolate cookies=10k boxes <15k box capacity of Albany
For the second year it would be 23k/2 because they have the original 2 lines which increase 1.25x from 12000 + the 2 new lines: 4000*2 meaning the second year is 3.5k over the threshold. If you could explain where you got 10k/2 from I could better understand your solving process and solution.
Sayan597
Hi Apt0810,
As per the statement the demand would be half if the cookies are getting produced in Buffalo. So, in Q2A, I agree the count for second year, but it will be 10000/2 = 5000 < 8000 (Min no. of boxes applied from Y2 of production), which is clearly violating the condition. Please do let me know if I'm getting anything wrong.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.