As per the statement the demand would be half if the cookies are getting produced in Buffalo. So, in Q2A, I agree the count for second year, but it will be 10000/2 = 5000 < 8000 (Min no. of boxes applied from Y2 of production), which is clearly violating the condition. Please do let me know if I'm getting anything wrong.
1)a)No,since in the first year itself the projection for each line is 6000 boxes per month so total sales for two existing units (with no new addition) =12000 boxes but capacity of Rochester is 12k boxes,so in 2nd year according to projected sales ,the sales will increase by 25% ,so total boxes to be produced would be >12k ,which won't be feasible for Rochester
b)Yes,since Buffalo has a total capacity of 25k boxes per month so for the current value of production =6k*2 =12k boxes for existing units +2000 boxes *2 for new units = 16k for first year , In second year= 12k*1.25 +4000*2 boxes for new lines=23k,so fine and for 3rd year =15k*1.25 +6000*2=30750k..But all these values will be halved since in Buffalo the resource sharing is there so demand is already halved.
c)No,,For Albany first year total =6000*2=12k boxes
Second year = 12k*1.25+2000 boxes of oatmeal(since this is the first year of its introduction) = 17k boxes
2)a) Yes, Buffalo for second year with pessimistic growth and no new introduction= 4000*2= 8k boxes - For first year
8k*1.25= 10000 boxes - For second year
all of which are <25k
b) Yes, Rochester for 1st year with pessimistic growth and no new introductions=
4000*2 =8k boxes for first year< 12k boxes capacity of Rochester
c)Yes,Albany for first year with pessimistic growth and introduction of chocolate cookies=
4000*2=8k boxes +2k boxes of chocolate cookies=10k boxes <15k box capacity of Albany
Posted from my mobile device