Last visit was: 28 Apr 2026, 12:33

It is currently 28 Apr 2026, 12:33

Toolkit

Practice Tests

Critical Reasoning (CR)

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Apr 28
Join - GMAT Day!
08:00 AM PDT
-
11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.

Back to Forum

Create Topic

A major chemical spill occurred five years ago at Baker’s Beach, the

1 2

jabhatta2

Joined: 15 Dec 2016

Last visit: 21 Apr 2023

Posts: 1,251

Own Kudos:

328

Given Kudos: 188

Posts: 1,251

Kudos: 328

07 Feb 2022, 17:16

Kudos

Bookmarks

Tried to create an analogy to see why option D is wrong

Quote:

Given more tourists in Canada this year --> Canada has low COVID cases

Weaken

(option Z) Canada gave out more tourist visas than usual this year
(option Z1) Canada reduced tourst visa fees to 0 dollars

Would these be weakeners ? I dont think (Z) and (Z1) would be weakeners , but i am not able to explain why exactly. (Z) and (Z1) are tempting for some reason.

Weakener is something that says -- GIVEN the premise has happened (For whatever reason it has) -- how can the conclusion STILL be false.

I think option Z and Z1 are tempting because it does explain the premise and gives ANOTHER reason (more visas or 0 $ visa fees) for the premise. I think our brains are then saying -- well if Z is true and the premise is also true -- how can you make the conclusion that you make to begin with. I think thats what going in my head atleast

But i dont think a weakener works like that.

I think a weakener in my analogy is

(option X) Tourists have COVID but are jabbed so no impact on anyone.

I think thats why D is wrong in the original problem.

avigutman

Tutor

Joined: 17 Jul 2019

Last visit: 30 Sep 2025

Posts: 1,285

Own Kudos:

1,908

[1]

Given Kudos: 66

Location: Canada

Schools: NYU Stern (WA)

GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45 Verified score

GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47 Verified score

GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45 Verified score

Expert

Expert reply

Schools: NYU Stern (WA)

GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45 Verified score

Posts: 1,285

Kudos: 1,908

[1]

08 Feb 2022, 11:45

Kudos

Bookmarks

jabhatta2

Tried to create an analogy to see why option D is wrong

Given more tourists in Canada this year --> Canada has low COVID cases

Your analogy is overly simplistic, jabhatta2, and that's causing you to spin around in circles.
The original argument's structure is quite complex. We have an argument that is offered in refutation of the environmentalists’ prediction. That's a mouthful. Take some time to digest what's going on here. There's a prediction made by environmentalists, but the author believes that their prediction is wrong, and he or she is attempting to convince us that indeed the environmentalists’ prediction is wrong.

So, what is their prediction?
The world’s Merrick population would decline as a result of the spill.

jabhatta2

Premise - the number of adult female Merricks returning to lay their eggs at Baker's Beach has actually increased somewhat since five years ago
option D, i thought provided support for this premise

No, option D doesn't provide support for this premise. This premise describes a surprising, unexpected phenomenon.

Option D, in a vacuum, provides a possible explanation for that phenomenon. However, we're not in a vacuum. We know that the chemical spill:

Quote:

prevented nearly all the eggs laid that year from hatching

Given that, the surprising, unexpected phenomenon remains unexplained when we read D. With eggs that won't hatch, what difference does it make whether they get eaten or not?

gmatimothy

Joined: 18 Apr 2022

Last visit: 19 Dec 2022

Posts: 104

Own Kudos:

Given Kudos: 704

Location: United States

Posts: 104

Kudos: 9

05 Jun 2022, 14:17

Kudos

Bookmarks

stevegt

A major chemical spill occurred five years ago at Baker’s Beach, the world’s sole nesting ground for Merrick sea turtles, and prevented nearly all the eggs laid that year from hatching. Yet the number of adult female Merricks returning to lay their eggs at Baker’s Beach has actually increased somewhat since five years ago. Clearly, environmentalists’ prediction that the world’s Merrick population would decline as a result of the spill has proven unfounded.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument offered in refutation of the environmentalists’ prediction?

Conclusion: "Clearly, environmentalists’ prediction that the world’s Merrick population would decline as a result of the spill has proven unfounded."

We need to attack the conclusion by saying that the chemical spill led to a population decline.

A. The chemical spill five years ago occurred at a time when there were neither Merrick sea turtles nor Merrick sea turtle eggs on Baker’s Beach.

B. Female Merrick sea turtles begin returning to Baker’s Beach to lay their eggs when they are ten years old.

This informs that the premise that is supporting the conclusion is faulty. If the female turtles returning today are from 10 years ago, which is before the major chemical spill, the author's conclusion is broken because spill doesn't have anything to do with the increase.

C. Under normal conditions, only a small proportion of hatchling female Merrick sea turtles survive in the ocean until adulthood and return to lay their eggs at Baker’s Beach.

D. Environmental pressures unrelated to the chemical spill have caused a significant decline in the population of one of the several species of sea birds that prey on Merrick sea turtle eggs.

It doesn't matter whether the the birds that prey on the eggs decreased or not. We won't know if that led to an increase in the female turtles that came back without making more assumptions. Therefore, (D) is inferior to (B)

E. After the chemical spill, an environmental group rejected a proposal to increase the Merrick sea turtle population by transferring eggs from Baker’s Beach to nearby beaches that had not been affected by the spill.

justinandtobey

Joined: 30 Jan 2022

Last visit: 14 Nov 2022

Posts: 1

Given Kudos: 5

Location: United States

Posts: 1

Kudos: 0

14 Aug 2022, 18:15

Kudos

Bookmarks

GMATNinja can you help with an explanation? I'm struggling to see why (D) is incorrect. I felt it offered a different explanation that would weaken the argument if true. Thanks in advance!

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

Joined: 13 Aug 2009

Last visit: 28 Apr 2026

Posts: 7,391

Own Kudos:

70,826

Given Kudos: 2,133

Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors

Location: United States (CO)

GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46 Verified score

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51 Verified score

GRE 1: Q170 V170 Verified score

GRE 2: Q170 V170 Verified score

Posts: 7,391

Kudos: 70,826

01 Sep 2022, 13:17

Kudos

Bookmarks

justinandtobey

GMATNinja can you help with an explanation? I'm struggling to see why (D) is incorrect. I felt it offered a different explanation that would weaken the argument if true. Thanks in advance!

Did you see this post? Check it out and let us know if you have any further questions!

Raman109

Joined: 17 Aug 2009

Last visit: 28 Jul 2025

Posts: 705

Own Kudos:

212

[1]

Given Kudos: 33

Posts: 705

Kudos: 212

[1]

10 Dec 2023, 06:51

Kudos

Bookmarks

Understanding the argument -
A major chemical spill occurred five years ago at Baker’s Beach, the world’s sole nesting ground for Merrick sea turtles, and prevented nearly all the eggs laid that year from hatching. Fact
Yet the number of adult female Merricks returning to lay their eggs at Baker’s Beach has actually increased somewhat since five years ago. "Yet" introduces the contrast, and this is a Fact.
Clearly, environmentalists’ prediction that the world’s Merrick population would decline as a result of the spill has proven unfounded. - Conclusion. "environmentalists’ prediction has proven unfounded"

Option Elimination - Weaken the conclusion.

A. The chemical spill five years ago occurred at a time when there were neither Merrick sea turtles nor Merrick sea turtle eggs on Baker’s Beach. - Facts respected. The argument clearly says the spill "prevented nearly all the eggs laid that year from hatching." Challenging the facts is not the scope of GMAT arguments.

B. Female Merrick sea turtles begin returning to Baker’s Beach to lay their eggs when they are ten years old. - ok. So, those impacted five years ago will show the results/come back, if any, five years from now.

C. Under normal conditions, only a small proportion of hatchling female Merrick sea turtles survive in the ocean until adulthood and return to lay their eggs at Baker’s Beach. Are we saying that with the chemical spill, more sea turtles survive somehow? At best, it's the opposite of what we need.

D. Environmental pressures unrelated to the chemical spill have caused a significant decline in the population of one of the several species of sea birds that prey on Merrick sea turtle eggs. - It's going in a direction that the population of sea turtles may increase. But wait, the scope of our argument is to weaken the conclusion, which is "environmentalists’ prediction that the world’s Merrick population would decline as a result of the spill has proven unfounded." So, we are primarily concerned about the chemical spill and its effect on sea turtles. This option talks about some other variable that is not even in the scope of the argument. Out of scope.

E. After the chemical spill, an environmental group rejected a proposal to increase the Merrick sea turtle population by transferring eggs from Baker’s Beach to nearby beaches that had not been affected by the spill. - out of scope.

KarishmaB

Tutor

Joined: 16 Oct 2010

Last visit: 28 Apr 2026

Posts: 16,447

Own Kudos:

79,437

[1]

Given Kudos: 485

Location: Pune, India

Products:

Expert

Expert reply

Posts: 16,447

Kudos: 79,437

[1]

23 Jun 2024, 22:21

Kudos

Bookmarks

stevegt

Premises:

A major chemical spill occurred five years ago at Baker’s Beach, the world’s sole nesting ground for Merrick sea turtles, and prevented nearly all the eggs laid that year from hatching.

Yet the number of adult female Merricks returning to lay their eggs at Baker’s Beach has actually increased somewhat since five years ago.

Conclusion:

Environmentalists’ prediction that the world’s Merrick population would decline as a result of the spill has proven unfounded.

Since five years after the spill, the population is the same (or even a bit more), the author is claiming that environmentalists’ prediction that the population would decline as a result of the spill is unfounded. We need to weaken the claim of the author i.e. we need to say that the environmentalists’ prediction could be accurate. The prediction is not unfounded. We need to say that the world’s Merrick population may decline as a result of the spill.

A. The chemical spill five years ago occurred at a time when there were neither Merrick sea turtles nor Merrick sea turtle eggs on Baker’s Beach.  

We are given that the spill prevented nearly all the eggs laid that year from hatching. Whether they were present at the time of the spill or were laid later is irrelevant.  

B. Female Merrick sea turtles begin returning to Baker’s Beach to lay their eggs when they are ten years old.  

After the eggs hatch, the turtles enter the sea. How many turtles are in the sea, we cannot say. We gauge the number based on how many females show up to lay the eggs.  The turtles coming right now to lay eggs are those that were born ten years ago.  One entire year’s eggs were lost due to the spill so after ten years we will see the impact of fewer female turtles coming to lay eggs. Hence the author’s claim that environmentalists’ prediction is unfounded based on the number of females coming to lay eggs at this time (5 years after the spill) may not be correct.
Correct.

C. Under normal conditions, only a small proportion of hatchling female Merrick sea turtles survive in the ocean until adulthood and return to lay their eggs at Baker’s Beach.  

Whatever may be the actual number of females coming to lay eggs, the number is higher than that of five years ago. That is all we care about.  

D. Environmental pressures unrelated to the chemical spill have caused a significant decline in the population of one of the several species of sea birds that prey on Merrick sea turtle eggs.  

We know that the number of females coming to lay the eggs has increased somewhat. What has been the impact of the spill and what has been the impact of fewer predators, we don’t know. Perhaps fewer predators has led to the increase and the spill had no impact. Perhaps the spill had a huge impact but fewer predators more than made up for it - we don’t know.   

E. After the chemical spill, an environmental group rejected a proposal to increase the Merrick sea turtle population by transferring eggs from Baker’s Beach to nearby beaches that had not been affected by the spill.  

Irrelevant to our argument. We already know that nearly all the eggs laid that year did not hatch.

Answer (B)

Discussion on Weaken Questions: https://youtu.be/EhZ8FKkfy0k

VerbalBot

Non-Human User

Joined: 01 Oct 2013

Last visit: 04 Jan 2021

Posts: 19,421

Own Kudos:

1,010

Posts: 19,421

Kudos: 1,010

28 Jun 2025, 00:29

Kudos

Bookmarks

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.

1 2

Moderators:

GMATNinja

GMAT Club Verbal Expert

7391 posts

AbhishekP220108

507 posts

bhanu29

363 posts