Here are the official solutions:
Q1. Which of the following can be inferred about the stability of the microbiota in early adulthood?
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
o A: This option is tempting because the passage mentions that diet and environmental factors can influence the microbiota. However, it overstates the frequency of change. The passage explicitly states that the microbiota remains relatively stable after early childhood and until later life.
o B: Correct. The passage clearly mentions that the microbiota resembles that of an adult by age 2.5 and remains relatively constant until old age, making this the best inference about its stability during early adulthood.
o C: This option is incorrect because while the microbiota does stabilize by age 2.5, the passage indicates that changes can still occur in later life, specifically during old age, making this too extreme a conclusion.
o D: This option introduces an incorrect idea. The passage mentions that changes in the microbiota are observed in old age, not during early adulthood. There is no mention of a gradual decline in diversity during early adulthood.
o E: The passage indicates that the microbiota remains relatively constant after early childhood until old age. This option incorrectly suggests a high degree of unpredictability after early adulthood, which is not supported by the passage.
Q2. Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument that antibiotics have long-lasting effects on microbiota?
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
o A: This option contradicts the argument by suggesting that the effects of antibiotics are not long-lasting. If all microbial species recover quickly, it would weaken the claim about sustained effects, not strengthen it.
o B: Correct. This option directly supports the argument that antibiotics have long-lasting effects by providing evidence that some species of microbiota never recover. This would solidify the notion that the impact of antibiotics on microbiota is persistent and potentially irreversible for certain species.
o C: This option weakens the argument. If individuals who avoid antibiotics have microbiota compositions similar to those who take antibiotics, it would suggest that antibiotics don’t have a significant long-term impact, weakening the claim.
o D: While the discovery of a new class of antibiotics that doesn't affect microbiota is interesting, it doesn't strengthen the argument about long-lasting effects of existing antibiotics. It introduces a different, unrelated development.
o E: This option suggests that the negative effects of antibiotics can be mitigated through dietary changes, which implies that the effects are not necessarily long-lasting. This would weaken, rather than strengthen, the argument by suggesting that the impact is reversible.
Q3. What does the author most likely mean by the term "forgotten organ" in the context of the passage?
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
o A: This option seems plausible, as it mentions the digestive system, but it is incorrect. The "forgotten organ" refers to the microbiota as a whole, not to a specific organ within the digestive system.
o B: Correct. The author uses "forgotten organ" as a metaphor to highlight the crucial role of the gut microbiota, which has historically been overlooked but is now recognized as essential for health.
o C: This option misinterprets the phrase. While the immune system's interaction with gut bacteria is discussed in the passage, the term "forgotten organ" specifically refers to the microbiota itself, not just the immune response.
o D: This option is misleading. The passage does not refer to the appendix as the "forgotten organ." While the appendix is part of the digestive system, the term here clearly applies to the microbiota.
o E: This option is too broad. While the microbiota includes various microorganisms, the passage specifically highlights the gut microbiota, not all microorganisms in the body, as the "forgotten organ."
Q4. If researchers were to find a significant change in the microbiota of middle-aged individuals, how would this finding relate to the passage?
Correct Answer: B
Explanation:
o A: This option is incorrect because the passage asserts that the microbiota remains relatively stable after early childhood and only changes significantly in old age. While diet and other factors can influence microbiota, the passage does not suggest that the composition is constantly changing throughout life.
o B: Correct. The passage claims that microbiota composition remains stable after infancy until old age. Finding a significant change in middle-aged individuals would contradict this claim, making this option the strongest answer.
o C: This option is tempting because the passage mentions that diet and socioeconomic conditions can influence microbiota. However, the passage still maintains that microbiota remains stable until old age, so this discovery would contradict that, not support it.
o D: This option is irrelevant to the question. The passage mentions antibiotics as one factor that influences microbiota, but the question is about age-related changes, not the impact of antibiotics.
o E: This option misinterprets the passage. The passage does not suggest that microbiota returns to its early childhood form at any point in adulthood. Instead, it emphasizes that microbiota stabilizes after infancy and remains so until old age.