Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 50004

A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2009, 07:26
Question Stats:
46% (02:33) correct 54% (02:17) wrong based on 1001 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics




Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8397
Location: Pune, India

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Jan 2016, 22:44
ra011y wrote: Bunuel wrote: Merging similar topics.
After you realize that the tallest and shortest have fixed positions you can just count possible arrangements without any formula. I immediately figured out that Position 1 and 6 were fixed, but then I ended up wasting my time trying to find a formula for the whole thing. After a while I stopped trying to find a formula and just counted the possible combinations and came up with 5. In addition to realising that Person1 (shortest) has to be in front and Person6 (tallest) has to be in the back row, you also need to realize that there is only one way of arranging the three people in the front and the three people in the back. If the front row has "Person1, Person2 and Person5", this is exactly how they will stand since they must be in increasing order of height from left to right. ________ __________ Person6 Person1 _________ _________ Now you have 4 people left (2, 3, 4,5) and you have to choose two of them for the front row. You can do it in 4C2 = 6 ways. But note that you cannot choose both taller people (Person4 and Person5) for the front row because then you will have two shorter people left for the back row and Person3 will be behind Person4. Rest all cases are fine. So number of ways = 6  1 = 5 ways Answer (A)
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
GMAT selfstudy has never been more personalized or more fun. Try ORION Free!




Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 284

Re: Photo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2009, 09:19
Well, to start with I'll at least try to get the answer Considering the arrangements: 4 5 6 1 2 3 2 4 6 1 3 5 2 5 6 1 3 4 3 4 6 1 2 5 3 5 6 1 2 4 Don't see other arrangements than 5. So would go with (A).




Intern
Affiliations: CA  India
Joined: 27 Oct 2009
Posts: 43
Location: India
Schools: ISB  Hyderabad, NSU  Singapore

Re: Photo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2009, 09:09
Let me try,
The arrangement will be something like this.
_ _ _ _ _ _
Position of A and F has to be fix i.t. bottom line left for A and upper line right for F. Other position needs to be filledin by B, C, D and E.
B can be on right or A or behind A. So 2 positions possible. C can be on right of B or behind him or A, that means 3 possible positions. D and E will have to fit into the positions accordingly without any option. Hence the ans should be 2 X 3 = 6.
Is that right?



Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 284

Re: Photo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2009, 09:25
gmattokyo wrote: Well, to start with I'll at least try to get the answer Considering the arrangements: 4 5 6 1 2 3 2 4 6 1 3 5 2 5 6 1 3 4 3 4 6 1 2 5 3 5 6 1 2 4 Don't see other arrangements than 5. So would go with (A). Position of 1 and 6 is fixed. Still don't see a formula for the rest, except manually finding the arrangement, which as you said takes more than 2 mins!



Senior Manager
Affiliations: PMP
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 265

Re: Photo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2009, 09:31
I got 6 as answer too, manually arranging assuming 1,2,3,4,5,6 as heights (since each is different from other) so possible positions are as below: 456 436 123 125 346 356 125 124 246 256 135 134 Kalpesh logic looks right to me... and is faster than listing possibilities
_________________
Thanks, Sri  keep uppp...ing the tempo...
Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip



Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 284

Re: Photo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2009, 09:41
srini123 wrote: gmattokyo wrote: gmattokyo wrote: Well, to start with I'll at least try to get the answer Considering the arrangements: 4 5 6 1 2 3 2 4 6 1 3 5 2 5 6 1 3 4 3 4 6 1 2 5 3 5 6 1 2 4 Don't see other arrangements than 5. So would go with (A). Position of 1 and 6 is fixed. Still don't see a formula for the rest, except manually finding the arrangement, which as you said takes more than 2 mins! u missed 436 125 But 436 wouldn't be correct as from left to right it has to in increasing order and 4 is greater than 3. Unless I'm not getting it?



Senior Manager
Affiliations: PMP
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 265

Re: Photo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2009, 10:32
u missed 436 125 [/quote] But 436 wouldn't be correct as from left to right it has to in increasing order and 4 is greater than 3. Unless I'm not getting it?[/quote] u r right, i got 436 125 incorrectly... so the answer is 5 ?
_________________
Thanks, Sri  keep uppp...ing the tempo...
Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 50004

Re: Photo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Oct 2009, 23:09



Director
Joined: 03 Sep 2006
Posts: 803

Re: Photo
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Dec 2010, 22:08
Solution ( courtesy Manhattan GMAT staff)BL BM BR FL FM FR ("B" stands for "back", "F" stands for "front", "L" stands for "left", etc.) Let's also assign "names" to each of the six people  1 is the shortest, 2 is the next shortest, ... and 6 is the tallest. Notice first that the only place where 6 can stand is in the BR position. A person standing in any of the other positions has to be shorter than at least one other person, and 6 isn't shorter than anybody. By similar reasoning, we can see that the only place where 1 can stand is in the FL position. A person standing in any of the other positions has to be taller than at least one other person, and 1 isn't taller than anybody. So we know that any possible arrangement will be of this form: BL BM 6 1 FM FR All we need to do is count possible ways of putting 2, 3, 4, and 5 in positions BL, BM, FM, and FR. In order to count possibilities, let's focus on who goes into the BL position. 1 and 6 are already fixed in their own positions. There's no way 5 could be in the BL position, because there would be no way to assign someone to BM such that the heights in the back row increased consistently from left to right. So we know that the person in the BL position has to be either 2, 3, or 4. We investigate each possibility in turn: If 2 goes in the BL position, there are just two possibilities: 2 4 6 1 3 5 and 2 5 6 1 3 4 If 3 goes in the BL position, there are also two possibilities: 3 4 6 1 2 5 and 3 5 6 1 2 4 If 4 goes in the BL position, there is just one possible arrangement: 4 5 6 1 2 3 Counting these possibilities, we see that there are only 5 possible arrangements.



Retired Thread Master
Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Posts: 140
Concentration: Strategy, Other
WE: Business Development (Consulting)

Re: GOOD QUESTION
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Feb 2011, 05:11
Bunuel wrote: Merging similar topics.
After you realize that the tallest and shortest have fixed positions you can just count possible arrangements without any formula. I immediately figured out that Position 1 and 6 were fixed, but then I ended up wasting my time trying to find a formula for the whole thing. After a while I stopped trying to find a formula and just counted the possible combinations and came up with 5.



Intern
Joined: 24 Oct 2014
Posts: 17

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Jul 2015, 23:45
Here is a way to do this question without using brute force 
Assume the 6 people in ascending order of height are 1,2,3,4,5,6.
Let the positions be
A B C D E F
Now, it is obvious that we have to fix 1 and 6 in the correct positions as shown below:
_ _ 6 1 _ _
Case 1:
Position A = 2
In that case, position B can only be 4 or 5, because, if B is 3, then both 4 and 5 will be greater than 3 (so, none can take positions E and F), and there won't be any case possible.
2 4 6 1 3 5
or
2 5 6 1 3 4
So, 2 solutions.
Case 2:
Position A = 3
In that case, position B cannot be 2. hence only 4 and 5 can take its place.
3 4 6 1 2 5
or
3 5 6 1 2 4
So, 2 solutions.
Case 3:
Position A = 4
In that case, position B can only be 5, and all other positions are also fixed.
4 5 6 1 2 3
So, 1 solution.
Hence, total solutions = 2 + 2 + 1 = 5
This can be done quite fast, but for the purpose of explaining, I have tried to be more elaborate.



Intern
Joined: 18 May 2015
Posts: 1

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Sep 2015, 11:29
Hi,
Correct me if i am wrong.
Why cant it be like this.
465 123
We are still passing all the conditions.



EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/CoFounder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 12685
Location: United States (CA)

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Sep 2015, 21:07
Hi All, In Quant questions such as these, the number of possible arrangements is sometimes so limited that you can actually just list them out  in that way, you can visualize the solution and just do a bit of 'brute force' work: Here, we're told to arrange 6 people (who all have DIFFERENT heights) into two rows of 3 so that each person in the first row is 'in front' of a taller person in the second row AND heights increase from 'left to right.' We're asked how many arrangements of people are possible. If we label the six people as 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (with 1 the shortest, and each number being 'taller' than the one immediately preceding it), we would have the following options... 456 123 356 124 346 125 256 134 246 135 There are NO other options. Final Answer: GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich
_________________
760+: Learn What GMAT Assassins Do to Score at the Highest Levels Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com
Rich Cohen
CoFounder & GMAT Assassin
Special Offer: Save $75 + GMAT Club Tests Free
Official GMAT Exam Packs + 70 Pt. Improvement Guarantee www.empowergmat.com/
*****Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!*****



Intern
Joined: 31 Oct 2015
Posts: 33

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Jan 2016, 15:23
I'm getting 15. Please see the attachment.
Attachments
SmartSelectImage_20160104171034.png [ 52.43 KiB  Viewed 11339 times ]



EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/CoFounder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 12685
Location: United States (CA)

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Jan 2016, 20:35
Hi kham71, A number of your examples do NOT follow the 'restrictions' that were mentioned in the prompt. We're told that... "The heights of the people within each row must INCREASE from left to right...." So, while 123 would be allowed, 213 would NOT. Keeping that restriction in mind, how many of your possibilities can you eliminate? GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich
_________________
760+: Learn What GMAT Assassins Do to Score at the Highest Levels Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com
Rich Cohen
CoFounder & GMAT Assassin
Special Offer: Save $75 + GMAT Club Tests Free
Official GMAT Exam Packs + 70 Pt. Improvement Guarantee www.empowergmat.com/
*****Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!*****



Manager
Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 219
Location: South Africa
Concentration: International Business, Organizational Behavior
GPA: 3.49
WE: Web Development (Insurance)

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Jul 2016, 05:22
kalpeshchopada7 wrote: Let me try,
The arrangement will be something like this.
_ _ _ _ _ _
Position of A and F has to be fix i.t. bottom line left for A and upper line right for F. Other position needs to be filledin by B, C, D and E.
B can be on right or A or behind A. So 2 positions possible. C can be on right of B or behind him or A, that means 3 possible positions. D and E will have to fit into the positions accordingly without any option. Hence the ans should be 2 X 3 = 6.
Is that right? You just got one thing wrong: There's one position C is behind A so Be can't be behind A in that position. It's very important to keep track of repeated formations. 61 = 5
_________________
Kudos if I helped



Manager
Joined: 17 Feb 2014
Posts: 101
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35 GMAT 2: 740 Q48 V42
WE: Programming (Computer Software)

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Dec 2016, 15:19
I got this problem wrong when I encountered it during my practice test but looking at the solution and applying some reverse thinking I came up with following explanation which makes it little easier to quickly solve the problem.
Let's say we have 6 heights = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}
1st arrangement is obvious which is as following:
4 5 6 < second row 1 2 3 < first row
Now we need to think about other possible arrangements with given restrictions.
Couple of things we need to note:
1) Since 1 is smallest and 6 is greatest, they CANNOT be placed elsewhere from their current position. Hence their position is fixed and we need to only concern ourselves with position of rest of the 4 numbers i.e. {2, 3, 4, 5}
2) For other possible arrangements, the numbers from first row will have to go into second and from second row to 1 first row.
3) From {2, 3, 4, 5}, you cannot move both {2, 3} to second row (with {4, 5} moved to 1st row) as it will not satisfy the constraints in any arrangement.
4) Now looking at numbers just from second row, let's say if either of them has to placed in 1st row, they can only occupy 3rd position. Hence we have following two case:
Case 1: Placing {4} in third position of the first row, find arrangements of {2, 3, 5} that satisfy the constraints given in the problem.
_ _ 6 1 _ 4
Case 2: Placing {5} in third position of the first row, find arrangements of {2, 3, 4} that satisfy the constraints given in the problem.
_ _ 6 1 _ 5
In each of the two cases above, you will find two arrangements that satisfy constraints.
Case 1: 1st arrangement: 3 5 6 1 2 4 2nd arrangement: 2 5 6 1 3 4
Case 2: 1st arrangement: 3 4 6 1 2 5 2nd arrangement: 2 4 6 1 3 5
Hence, total arrangements: 1 + 2 + 2 = 5 arrangements.



Intern
Joined: 19 Feb 2017
Posts: 4

A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Mar 2017, 21:30
I think VeritasPrepKarishma's method is great, but it's a bit difficult for me to immediately see what cases should be omitted.
Here's how I did it, without brute force. Let us label the persons in increasing order of height from 16 and the spots as follows: D E F A B C
1. First, realize that A=1 and F=6, as Bunuel has pointed out above. Shortest person must be in front on the left and tallest person must be in the back on the right.
2. Second, realize that spot B must equal 2 or 3. (Spot B cannot be 4, because you need two taller persons (one behind in spot E and one to the right in spot C). However, only person number 5 is taller and available for assignment. Spot B cannot be 5 for the same reason  no taller persons available to be assigned at the back or to the right).
3. If spot B = 2, C may be 3, 4 or 5 (3 possible cases) If spot B = 3, C may be 4 or 5 (2 possible cases) For each of the above 5 cases, since spots A, B, C and F have been assigned, you only have 1 possible way of D and E.
4. I have identified 5 possible cases above. Ideally, I should try each of them out to make sure it works. However, the smallest option given is "5". Therefore, stop work and select that option.



Intern
Joined: 28 Oct 2014
Posts: 34
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GPA: 3.89
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)

Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Mar 2017, 08:14
srini123 wrote: I got 6 as answer too, manually arranging assuming 1,2,3,4,5,6 as heights (since each is different from other)
so possible positions are as below:
456 436 123 125
346 356 125 124
246 256 135 134
Kalpesh logic looks right to me... and is faster than listing possibilities 436 125 is not a valid combination. The order should be in ascending order in each row.




Re: A photographer will arrange 6 people of 6 different heights &nbs
[#permalink]
12 Mar 2017, 08:14



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 28 posts ]



