A purse containing 32 ancient gold coins that had been minted in Morocco was discovered in the ruins of an ancient Jordanian city some 4,000 kilometers to the east of Morocco. In its time the Jordanian city was an important trading center along the trade route linking China and Europe, and it was also a popular stopover for pilgrims on the route between Morocco and Mecca. The purse of a trader in the city would probably have contained a more diverse set of coins.
The statements above, if true, most strongly support which one of the following hypotheses?
(A) Moroccan coins were more valuable in the ancient city than were Jordanian coins.
None of the statements point us in this direction.
(B) Most gold coins available during the time when the ancient city thrived were minted in Morocco.
Not necessarily. None of the statements point us in this direction. We just know that the coins found in the ancient city were minted in Morocco. No more no less.
(C) The purse with the gold coins had been brought to the ancient city by a pilgrim on the route between Morocco and Mecca.
The last statement said that a trader's purse would have contained diverse coins and the major reasons given to us for travelling between the cities was trade center and piligrim, so as the coins were all same it wouldnt have been trader and hence piligrim
(D) Gold coins were the only medium of exchange used in the ancient city.
No information points us to this
(E) Pilgrims and traders in the ancient city were unlikely to have interacted with one another.
Not sure. No information points us to this