Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 15:30 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 15:30
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
lonepassenger
Joined: 01 Jul 2016
Last visit: 31 May 2017
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 20
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 7,149
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
lonepassenger
Joined: 01 Jul 2016
Last visit: 31 May 2017
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 20
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
thecriticalreader1
Joined: 16 May 2016
Last visit: 06 Apr 2017
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
278
 [1]
Posts: 4
Kudos: 278
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
The Scandinavian assault on western Europe culminated in the early eleventh century with the Danish conquest of the English Kingdom, which other Scandinavian kings attempted to repeat, unsuccessfully, later in the same century.

I think this is a case that blurs the line between the strict application of a rule and the question of what actually makes the most sense.

Technically, yes, the noun preceding "which" is "English Kingdom," but the English Kingdom is probably not something other Scandinavian kings attempted to repeat.

A much more logical interpretation of the sentence is that the Scandinavian kings attempted to repeat the Danish conquest of the English kingdom. "Conquest" indicates an action, which can be repeated. In contrast, "English Kingdom" can only refer to a place, which cannot really be repeated.

If the sentence is understood this way, then "English Kingdom" is merely part of the longer noun phrase "conquest of the English kingdom."

The literal antecedent is of "which" is "Danish conquest," but the complete antecedent is "Danish conquest of the English kingdom."

So even though "which" is technically separated from the antecedent "Danish conquest," in practice, the entire noun phrase acts as the antecedent.

The literal separation of "Danish conquest" and "which" is acceptable because from a logical standpoint, there really isn't any ambiguity.

Hope that helps.
User avatar
GMATNinjaTwo
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 20 Nov 2016
Last visit: 02 Oct 2025
Posts: 231
Own Kudos:
1,095
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,071
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V47
GMAT 2: 770 Q49 V48
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V47
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 4: 790 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 231
Kudos: 1,095
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
A much more logical interpretation of the sentence is that the Scandinavian kings attempted to repeat the Danish conquest of the English kingdom. "Conquest" indicates an action, which can be repeated. In contrast, "English Kingdom" can only refer to a place, which cannot really be repeated.

Well said by thecriticalreader1... logically, it makes sense that the adjective clause introduced by “which” is trying to modify “conquest”; however, because of its placement, the clause seems to modify “kingdom”. The same issue occurs in this sentence: “Pinot Noir can be made from grapes from California and Oregon, which are harvested in the fall.” What is harvested in the fall? Obviously the grapes, not “California and Oregon”; however, the placement of the clause creates ambiguity, and the GMAT would not like that sentence! The sentence in the original post would be incorrect for the same reason.

Make sure to post future sentence correction questions to the SC subforum and include the answer choices and OA, as per the Verbal Forum rules.

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
189 posts
Current Student
710 posts
Current Student
275 posts