OE
Step 1: Understand the Argument
Premise: A study of 1,000 people over 60 found that:
- 50 out of 500 coffee drinkers developed Alzheimer’s.
- 100 out of 500 non-coffee drinkers developed Alzheimer’s.
Conclusion: Drinking coffee daily reduces the risk of Alzheimer’s disease.
Step 2: Identify the Question Type
This is a "Weaken the Argument" question. We need to find a statement that undermines the causal claim that coffee reduces Alzheimer’s risk.
Step 3: Look for Potential Weaknesses in the Argument
The argument assumes that coffee is the only factor affecting Alzheimer’s risk. However, other variables (e.g., genetics, diet, exercise) could explain the difference. A good weakener will introduce an alternative explanation or confounding factor.
Step 4: Evaluate the Answer Choices
A) This suggests genetics could be a confounding factor. However, it doesn’t directly explain why coffee drinkers had lower rates. Weak weakener.
B) This is broad and hints at confounding variables, but it doesn’t specify which factors.
C) Irrelevant. The argument is about Alzheimer’s, not blood pressure.
D) Strong weakener! This provides an alternative explanation: healthier habits (not coffee) may have caused the lower Alzheimer’s risk.
E) This critiques generalizability, but it doesn’t directly challenge the causal link.
Answer: D