GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 12 Dec 2019, 00:58

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Retired Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2011
Posts: 196
A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2012, 21:09
2
7
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

75% (01:17) correct 25% (01:44) wrong based on 430 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to have “take charge” personalities, with the predominant traits of assertiveness, decisiveness, and self-confidence. The researcher concluded that people who are more “take charge” than the average person are more likely to become corporate executives.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researcher’s conclusion?


(A) Holding the job of a corporate executive causes people to develop “take charge” personality traits.

(B) When working on charitable or community projects, corporate executives often use their ability to make decisions and lead people to make those projects successful.

(C) Some people who are not executives have stronger “take charge” personalities than some people who currently serve as corporate executives.

(D) Many people who aspire to become executives exhibit different management styles in their current jobs.

(E) The executives that the researcher studied were often unsuccessful when they tried to manage their family activities as they do their business activities.

Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Bunuel's fan!
Joined: 08 Jul 2011
Posts: 125
Re: A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2012, 10:45
A) Holding the job of a corporate executive causes people to develop “take charge” personality
traits.

A reverses the causal relationship.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2011
Posts: 95
Location: India
Re: A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 May 2012, 19:51
mohankumarbd wrote:
A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to have “take charge”
personalities, with the predominant traits of assertiveness, decisiveness, and self-confidence.
The researcher concluded that people who are more “take charge” than the average person
are more likely to become corporate executives. Which of the following, if true, most
seriously weakens the researcher’s conclusion?


Main CR Qs link - Main link - cr-qs-600-700-level-131508.html


This is another causal reasoning question.

People who have "take charge" (CAUSE) ----> (EFFECT) Become executives.
One of the way to weaken this causal relationship is to show that the REVERSE RELATIONSHIP holds true. Becoming executive lead them to develop "take charge" personality.

Option A is correct.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 299
Re: A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2012, 11:37
2
The argument: People with "take charge" personalities are likely to become executives. How do we weaken? By showing that people who become executive do not necessarily have "take charge" personalities.

(A) Holding the job of a corporate executive causes people to develop “take charge” personality traits.

Bullseye: Having an executive job makes someone have a "take charge" personality. That is, it is the job that causes the "take charge" personality, and not the fact that "take charge" people are drawn to the executive job.

(B) When working on charitable or community projects, corporate executives often use their ability to make decisions and lead people to make those projects successful.

Does not relate.

(C) Some people who are not executives have stronger “take charge” personalities than some people who currently serve as corporate executives.

This one is tempting. But it DOESN'T really weaken the argument. After all, the argument is that "take charge" people are the only ones that the become executives, not that the only job "take charge" people have is that of an executive.

(D) Many people who aspire to become executives exhibit different management styles in their current jobs.

Does NOT relate to those who are executives (aspiring and actually being are two different things).

(E) The executives that the researcher studied were often unsuccessful when they tried to manage their family activities as they do their business activities.

Totally unrelated.

Hope that helps :).
_________________
Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Nov 2008
Posts: 57
Re: A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Sep 2013, 11:50
1
Quote:
A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to have “take charge” personalities, with the predominant traits of assertiveness, decisiveness, and self-confidence. The researcher concluded that people who are more “take charge” than the average person are more likely to become corporate executives.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researcher’s conclusion?

(A) Holding the job of a corporate executive causes people to develop “take charge” personality traits.

(B) When working on charitable or community projects, corporate executives often use their ability to make decisions and lead people to make those projects successful.

(C) Some people who are not executives have stronger “take charge” personalities than some people who currently serve as corporate executives.

(D) Many people who aspire to become executives exhibit different management styles in their current jobs.

(E) The executives that the researcher studied were often unsuccessful when they tried to manage their family activities as they do their business activities.


OFFICIAL EXPLANATION


Consider how the researcher reached the conclusion that having a more “take charge” personality makes a person more likely to become a corporate executive. Only one justification is given for this proposed cause and effect: the observation that a “take charge” personality tends to be observed in people who are corporate executives. However, it could be the case that the cause and effect relationship flows in the opposite direction than that proposed in the argument, as it is possible that a person first becomes a corporate executive and then develops a more “take charge” personality as a result.

(A) CORRECT. If a “take charge” personality is observed in people who are corporate executives because the job itself causes those traits to emerge, then the researcher’s conclusion that the personality traits lead to the job would be weakened.

(B) The behavior of corporate executives outside of the corporate world is not relevant to the argument.

(C) The fact that some non-executives have stronger "take charge" personalities than some people who are corporate executives does not substantially weaken the argument, as the existence of people who embody the extremes of a "take charge" personality does not disprove that those with a "take charge" personality are more likely to move into the role of corporate executive. Moreover, the personalities of non-executives are not relevant as counterexamples to the researcher’s argument about executives.

(D) The argument concerns “take charge” personality traits, not other management styles. It is possible that the people who aspire to become executives have “take charge” personalities, but have to adjust their management style according to the demands of their current jobs. Thus, this statement does not weaken the researcher’s conclusion.

(E) The success or failure of the executive’s management style, particularly outside of the corporate world, is not relevant to the conclusion.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 98
Re: A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Aug 2014, 01:04
A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to have “take charge” personalities, with the predominant traits of assertiveness, decisiveness, and self-confidence. The researcher concluded that people who are more “take charge” than the average person are more likely to become corporate executives.
"take charge" personality -----> increase the possibility of becoming corporate executives

to weaken the causal relation we can claim that the relationship is reverse... corporate executives develop "take charge" characteristics over time.
that's what A says
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 22 Feb 2009
Posts: 153
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2014, 02:36
tuanquang269 wrote:
This is my new project: Renew Old Thread => Back to basic => Just try It and give your reasoning
The topic will be sticky for 2 days from starting


A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to have “take charge” personalities, with the predominant traits of assertiveness, decisiveness, and self-confidence. The researcher concluded that people who are more “take charge” than the average person are more likely to become corporate executives.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researcher’s conclusion?

(A) Holding the job of a corporate executive causes people to develop “take charge” personality traits.

(B) When working on charitable or community projects, corporate executives often use their ability to make decisions and lead people to make those projects successful.

(C) Some people who are not executives have stronger “take charge” personalities than some people who currently serve as corporate executives.

(D) Many people who aspire to become executives exhibit different management styles in their current jobs.

(E) The executives that the researcher studied were often unsuccessful when they tried to manage their family activities as they do their business activities.


A is the answer, people who are more “take charge” than the average person
are more likely to become corporate executives (A--> B), to weaken that we can say if B causes A, then A may not cause B
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Manager
Affiliations: Manager
Joined: 06 Nov 2012
Posts: 127
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Sustainability
Schools: Boston U '19 (D)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
GPA: 3
WE: Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Feb 2015, 00:19
A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to have “take charge” personalities, with the predominant traits of assertiveness, decisiveness, and self-confidence. The researcher concluded that people who are more “take charge” than the average person are more likely to become corporate executives.

This is cause'n'effect type Weaken question.
Conclusion: More “take charge” ---> More likelihood to become corp-ex. ( X-->Y)
Weaken may be:
1. X -/-> Y
2. Z --->y
3. Y --->X
4. X ---> (no Y)
5. (no X) ---> Y
6. Data given is not correct


Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researcher’s conclusion?

A. Holding the job of a corporate executive causes people to develop “take charge” personality traits - Correct. Go with Point 3.

B. When working on charitable or community projects, corporate executives often use their ability to make decisions and lead people to make those projects successful - We are not concerned with ability other than ''take charge''

C. Some people who are not executives have stronger “take charge” personalities than some people who currently serve as corporate executives - We are concerned with those people who are executives.

D. Many people who aspire to become executives exhibit different management styles in their current jobs - Irrlevant.

E. The executives that the researcher studied were often unsuccessful when they tried to manage their family activities as they do their business activities - OFS

OA please....
_________________
Hard-work, Perseverance and Commitment.....
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2013
Posts: 198
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 03-02-2015
GPA: 3.88
Re: A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Feb 2015, 00:59
Here we go:


Premise: corporate executives tend to have “take charge” personalities.
Conclusion: people who are more “take charge” than the average person are more likely to become corporate executives


A. Holding the job of a corporate executive causes people to develop “take charge” personality traits.
--- This option states thet it's the job that develops the personality traits not the other way round---


B. When working on charitable or community projects, corporate executives often use their ability to make decisions and lead people to make those projects successful.
---- Irrelevant-----


C. Some people who are not executives have stronger “take charge” personalities than some people who currently serve as corporate executives.
--- Irrelevant----


D. Many people who aspire to become executives exhibit different management styles in their current jobs.
---- out of scope -----

E. The executives that the researcher studied were often unsuccessful when they tried to manage their family activities as they do their business activities.
---- out of scope----


Option A is correct
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Applied
Joined: 02 May 2014
Posts: 123
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.35
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Feb 2015, 03:15
Option A states that trait "take charge" is because of the persons holding the corporate executive positions and not the other way round..thus this tells us that actually cause is actually opposite hence it is the best option to weaken
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 17 May 2015
Posts: 32
Re: A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2015, 04:34
Dear All,
need great help. Appreciate your comments.
I got confused between A and C.

Conclusion: people who are more “take charge” than the average person are more likely to become corporate executives.

Possible weaken: 1. not all people with more take charge will become corporate executive
2. Executive jobs requires that

I got confused between A and C and ended up with C.
how to avoid this confusion.
Hope to hear from you. Many thanks
Many thanks.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 24 Nov 2015
Posts: 480
Location: United States (LA)
Reviews Badge
Re: A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Apr 2016, 12:52
In the first read there appears to be some confusion between option A and C.But when you read the premise and the conclusion throughly, we get the clear answer as option A
Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 600
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Apr 2017, 13:52
Conclusion :- having a more “take charge” personality makes a person more likely to become a corporate executive.

research study: corporate executives have 'take charge' personalities.
Conclusion: people who have take charge personalities -> likely to become corporate executive.

Now this is similiar to cause -> effect reasoning. what if effect-> cause? This is a definite weakener.

1)Holding the job of a corporate executive causes people to develop "take charge" personality traits. [addresses Effect -> Cause. Correct.]
If a “take charge” personality is observed in people who are
corporate executives because the job itself causes those traits to emerge, then
the researcher’s conclusion that the personality traits lead to the job would be
weakened.
_________________
Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 23 Nov 2016
Posts: 310
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Mar 2019, 07:55
GetThisDone wrote:
A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to have “take charge” personalities, with the predominant traits of assertiveness, decisiveness, and self-confidence. The researcher concluded that people who are more “take charge” than the average person are more likely to become corporate executives.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researcher’s conclusion?


(A) Holding the job of a corporate executive causes people to develop “take charge” personality traits.

(B) When working on charitable or community projects, corporate executives often use their ability to make decisions and lead people to make those projects successful.

(C) Some people who are not executives have stronger “take charge” personalities than some people who currently serve as corporate executives.

(D) Many people who aspire to become executives exhibit different management styles in their current jobs.

(E) The executives that the researcher studied were often unsuccessful when they tried to manage their family activities as they do their business activities.



The Skeleton of the passage is that P causes Q . Now we have weaken the assumption or link. Option A says that P doesn't cause Q, rather Q causes P.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav   [#permalink] 24 Mar 2019, 07:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by

A researcher studying corporate executives found that they tend to hav

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





cron

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne