Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1811:00 AM PST
-12:00 PM PST
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 30 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
08 Jul 2025, 07:11
Kudos
Bookmarks
For anyone having a hard time for the first question in this, as I also made the mistake. It means even if we assume that there is overlapp between the 2 groups only 22 people would somewhat agree regarding the music classes, and for majority we need 24. Hence, sufficient.
This is a really tricky one consider in 3rd part of this ques, you can't assume overlap as it is not given but in the first part you need to think on your toes that even if that was the case then also it won't be majority, hence data is sufficient. (Think of it like thinking of extreme case)
Whereas in 3rd part there could be multiple scenarios, 2%, 1% or even more so the way you read the question and understood it was right, it is just looking at the stem from a diff perspective.
This is a really tricky one consider in 3rd part of this ques, you can't assume overlap as it is not given but in the first part you need to think on your toes that even if that was the case then also it won't be majority, hence data is sufficient. (Think of it like thinking of extreme case)
Whereas in 3rd part there could be multiple scenarios, 2%, 1% or even more so the way you read the question and understood it was right, it is just looking at the stem from a diff perspective.
09 Nov 2025, 06:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
KarishmaB
Thank you for this great answer! So, for the question, even if the number was 30% we still cannot determine the amount of people that somewhat agreed to both right (since we don't know who is voting what)? In that case, would we say Cannot be determined?
Thank you for this great answer! So, for the question, even if the number was 30% we still cannot determine the amount of people that somewhat agreed to both right (since we don't know who is voting what)? In that case, would we say Cannot be determined?
KarishmaB
10 Nov 2025, 02:46
Kudos
Bookmarks
Yes, if instead of 22, we had 30, then we cannot determine whether "most" respondents who indicated they somewhat agreed that class sizes should be reduced also indicate that they somewhat agreed that music classes should be added.
fujicosmic
