GulfTube
Hello
KarishmaB, am I correct in my understanding of first question that
we can be certain in stating the extreme that "it is possible that of the 47 people who "somewhat agreed" to reducing class size, none 'somewhat agreed' to adding music classes"
because 47+22 is 69 which is less than a 100, meaning out of the 47 saying somewhat agreed" to reducing class size, it is possible to assign 22 people to some other response for adding music classes without any overlap.
Whereas, had it been a number which exceeds 100, there would definitely have been an overlap in the respondents who said "somewhat agreed" to reducing class size and also 'somewhat agreed' to adding music classes". But since the overlap would not enable us to determine if it is less or more than 24 respondents (MOST of the 47 respondents), the answer then would be
cannot determine because of that insufficiency.
Take a simpler case.
Say in a group of 100 people, 10 people said "reduce class size".
Say in the same group of 100, 3 people said "Add music classes".
Now maximum how many people could have said both the things? Only 3. After all, only 3 people said "Add music classes." So at most only 30% of those who said "reduce class size" could have also said "Add music class" (3 of the 10).
It is possible that no one said both the things and these 10 and the 3 are different people but if I want to find the MAXIMUM possible number who could have said both, it would be 3.
This is what question 1 is all about.
Of 100, 47 somewhat agreed to reducing class size.
Of 100, 22 somewhat agreed to adding music classes.
So at most 22 could have said both. Now "MOST" respondents who somewhat agreed to reducing class size would be 24 (more than 50% of 47). Is it possible that 24 somewhat agreed to adding music classes? NO. After all, only 22 people somewhat agreed to adding music classes.