Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
50%
(00:00)
correct 50%
(01:08)
wrong
based on 2
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
.A scientist who wishes to devise a meaningful theory must take into account the concept of falsification. That is, he must phrase his ideas in such a way that at least one possible outcome of experimentation would, if observed, disprove the theory. An example of failure to meet this criterion would be the scientist ----
Which of the following best completes the passage above?
a.Whose theory is consistent with all currently known facts about its subject.
b.Who fails to engage in experimentation to explore the correspondence between his theory and reality
c.Whose theory fails to predict the actual observed outcome of experimentation.
d.Whose theory identifies correlations, but no actual cause and effect mechanisms.
e.Whose theory predicts all conceivable results of testing.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I was deciding between C & E. Also, I am trying really hard to keep it under two minutes. I didnt pick E, because it really doesnt say anything of importance. Just because he/she takes into consideration all possible outcomes, DOES NOT mean that he didnt account for a possibility of falsification. So, no not E, hmmm
IMO, E negates the concept of falsification. If all outcomes are predicted, then it is not possible that at least 1 outcome is not, as defined by the concept of falsification
Here is what I think guys. If I were to phrase the continuation of the sentence, it would have be something along the lines of: The scientist left no room to find any cracks in his theory (in laments terms). In other words, no matter how many observations, we WILL not find one observation that is contrary to his theory, or proves it wrong.
According to A: his theory is consistent with all known facts. Which could mean that one of those facts is contradictory to his theory, therefore can prove his theory wrong. Thus he didnt fail to meet the criterion. What so you guys think?
IMO, E negates the concept of falsification. If all outcomes are predicted, then it is not possible that at least 1 outcome is not, as defined by the concept of falsification
Show more
Wheeew, as always, I hate it when this happens. E was so tempted to go with E in the first place, change my mind many times and happens to be wrong. "It will payoff really well on the real thing." :beat
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.