GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 May 2019, 03:55

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people to take

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55228
A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people to take  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2018, 23:56
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

33% (01:38) correct 67% (01:48) wrong based on 242 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people to take up chess. Since chess is most enjoyable when two people of equal ability play one another, the group believed that few people play chess becauseit is so hard to finda suitable opponent.

Which of the following statements would most seriously undermine the consotium's viewpoint?

A. On average, a set of chess pieces costs much more than most other board games.

B. The chess industry received a lot of favourable publicity last year when a computer defeated the world chess chempion for the first time.

C. Tennis is most enjoyable when two equally mathed opponents play each other, and the number of young tennis players has risen steadily.

D. Playing chess help children develop analytical minds and learn to devise strategies to acheive long-term goals.

E. More than 50000 chess sets were sold last year.

_________________
Intern
Joined: 10 Jul 2016
Posts: 15
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people to take  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2018, 00:18
2
A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people to take up chess. Since chess is most enjoyable when two people of equal ability play one another, the group believed that few people play chess because it is so hard to find a suitable opponent.

Which of the following statements would most seriously undermine the consortium's viewpoint?

A. On average, a set of chess pieces costs much more than most other board games. Irrelevant. Other games might be costlier than board games. And we don't know if cheaper games are popular or not.

B. The chess industry received a lot of favorable publicity last year when a computer defeated the world chess champion for the first time. Reverse. The advertisement that chess received should make more people interested in playing chess. This suggests may be the argument is right.

C. Tennis is most enjoyable when two equally matched opponents play each other, and the number of young tennis players has risen steadily. This is correct as it compares tennis, another game best enjoyed when properly matched opponents play, is rising in popularity while chess isn't. This creates doubt that the problem with chess might not be the one stated in the argument.

D. Playing chess help children develop analytical minds and learn to devise strategies to achieve long-term goals. Irrelevant Evidence. There is nothing in argument about Developing analytical minds and achieving long term goals.

E. More than 50000 chess sets were sold last year. Irrelevant evidence. There is nothing stated in the argument to compare the sales figures of chess sets with.

ANS : C
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 363
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Re: A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people to take  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2018, 06:33
Bunuel wrote:
A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people to take up chess. Since chess is most enjoyable when two people of equal ability play one another, the group believed that few people play chess becauseit is so hard to finda suitable opponent.

Which of the following statements would most seriously undermine the consotium's viewpoint?

A. On average, a set of chess pieces costs much more than most other board games.

B. The chess industry received a lot of favourable publicity last year when a computer defeated the world chess chempion for the first time.

C. Tennis is most enjoyable when two equally mathed opponents play each other, and the number of young tennis players has risen steadily.

D. Playing chess help children develop analytical minds and learn to devise strategies to acheive long-term goals.

E. More than 50000 chess sets were sold last year.

A. Seems correct. Provides an alternative explanation why chess are not so popular. Not because it is hard to find opponent but because chess set is more expensive then other board games.
B. Irrelevant.
C.Tennis is not discussed in the stimulus
D. Explains why children must play chess but doesn't undermine conclusion.
E. So what?
_________________
"Are you gangsters?" - "No we are Russians!"
Intern
Joined: 21 Dec 2016
Posts: 32
Re: A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people to take  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2018, 13:51
Konstantin1983 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people to take up chess. Since chess is most enjoyable when two people of equal ability play one another, the group believed that few people play chess becauseit is so hard to finda suitable opponent.

Which of the following statements would most seriously undermine the consotium's viewpoint?

A. On average, a set of chess pieces costs much more than most other board games.

B. The chess industry received a lot of favourable publicity last year when a computer defeated the world chess chempion for the first time.

C. Tennis is most enjoyable when two equally mathed opponents play each other, and the number of young tennis players has risen steadily.

D. Playing chess help children develop analytical minds and learn to devise strategies to acheive long-term goals.

E. More than 50000 chess sets were sold last year.

A. Seems correct. Provides an alternative explanation why chess are not so popular. Not because it is hard to find opponent but because chess set is more expensive then other board games.
B. Irrelevant.
C.Tennis is not discussed in the stimulus
D. Explains why children must play chess but doesn't undermine conclusion.
E. So what?

Even I went with option A with the same reasoning. Can someone explain how C is correct?
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Posts: 363
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
WE: Sales (Telecommunications)
Re: A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people to take  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2018, 03:15
naval2272 wrote:
Konstantin1983 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people to take up chess. Since chess is most enjoyable when two people of equal ability play one another, the group believed that few people play chess becauseit is so hard to finda suitable opponent.

Which of the following statements would most seriously undermine the consotium's viewpoint?

A. On average, a set of chess pieces costs much more than most other board games.

B. The chess industry received a lot of favourable publicity last year when a computer defeated the world chess chempion for the first time.

C. Tennis is most enjoyable when two equally mathed opponents play each other, and the number of young tennis players has risen steadily.

D. Playing chess help children develop analytical minds and learn to devise strategies to acheive long-term goals.

E. More than 50000 chess sets were sold last year.

A. Seems correct. Provides an alternative explanation why chess are not so popular. Not because it is hard to find opponent but because chess set is more expensive then other board games.
B. Irrelevant.
C.Tennis is not discussed in the stimulus
D. Explains why children must play chess but doesn't undermine conclusion.
E. So what?

Even I went with option A with the same reasoning. Can someone explain how C is correct?

I searched this question in other forums and found an explanation for C. So C is correct because it says that "young players prefer to play tennis and not chess and this is why a few young people prefer chess to tennis". Well sounds well but i still think that A could be an answer too because it offers alternative explanation. Would like to know the source of this question.
_________________
"Are you gangsters?" - "No we are Russians!"
Senior RC Moderator
Status: Preparing GMAT
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 2748
Location: Pakistan
GPA: 3.39
A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people to take  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Jan 2019, 10:21
1
Official Explanation

Source: Princeton Review
Difficulty Level: 750

Because tennis and chess both require a suitable opponent and tennis is flourishing, there must be some other reason why kids don’t play chess. Choice A is a knock against chess, but it doesn’t address the premise about finding someone to play with; neither does B. Whether chess is a useful activity is not relevant, so D is out. E is bad for two reasons: (1) we have no data to compare, so we don’t know if the number is rising or falling, and (2) we don’t know that all sets that were purchased are being used. C is the Answer

Hope it Helps
_________________
New Project RC Butler 2019 - Practice 2 RC Passages Everyday
Final days of the GMAT Exam? => All GMAT Flashcards.
This Post Helps = Press +1 Kudos
Best of Luck on the GMAT!!
A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people to take   [#permalink] 16 Jan 2019, 10:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by