Last visit was: 01 May 2026, 15:55 It is currently 01 May 2026, 15:55
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 110,001
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,976
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 110,001
Kudos: 812,335
 [19]
Kudos
Add Kudos
19
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
mitravanu
Joined: 10 Jul 2016
Last visit: 03 May 2019
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
97
 [2]
Given Kudos: 25
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Posts: 12
Kudos: 97
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Konstantin1983
Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Last visit: 08 Dec 2021
Posts: 298
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 353
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
WE:Sales (Telecommunications)
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
Posts: 298
Kudos: 324
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
naval2272
Joined: 21 Dec 2016
Last visit: 07 Jun 2019
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 26
Posts: 25
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Konstantin1983
Bunuel
A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people to take up chess. Since chess is most enjoyable when two people of equal ability play one another, the group believed that few people play chess becauseit is so hard to finda suitable opponent.

Which of the following statements would most seriously undermine the consotium's viewpoint?


A. On average, a set of chess pieces costs much more than most other board games.

B. The chess industry received a lot of favourable publicity last year when a computer defeated the world chess chempion for the first time.

C. Tennis is most enjoyable when two equally mathed opponents play each other, and the number of young tennis players has risen steadily.

D. Playing chess help children develop analytical minds and learn to devise strategies to acheive long-term goals.

E. More than 50000 chess sets were sold last year.

A. Seems correct. Provides an alternative explanation why chess are not so popular. Not because it is hard to find opponent but because chess set is more expensive then other board games.
B. Irrelevant.
C.Tennis is not discussed in the stimulus
D. Explains why children must play chess but doesn't undermine conclusion.
E. So what?


Even I went with option A with the same reasoning. Can someone explain how C is correct?
User avatar
Konstantin1983
Joined: 02 Dec 2014
Last visit: 08 Dec 2021
Posts: 298
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 353
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Economics
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
WE:Sales (Telecommunications)
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V33
Posts: 298
Kudos: 324
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
naval2272
Konstantin1983
Bunuel
A small marketing consortium wanted to get more young people to take up chess. Since chess is most enjoyable when two people of equal ability play one another, the group believed that few people play chess becauseit is so hard to finda suitable opponent.

Which of the following statements would most seriously undermine the consotium's viewpoint?


A. On average, a set of chess pieces costs much more than most other board games.

B. The chess industry received a lot of favourable publicity last year when a computer defeated the world chess chempion for the first time.

C. Tennis is most enjoyable when two equally mathed opponents play each other, and the number of young tennis players has risen steadily.

D. Playing chess help children develop analytical minds and learn to devise strategies to acheive long-term goals.

E. More than 50000 chess sets were sold last year.

A. Seems correct. Provides an alternative explanation why chess are not so popular. Not because it is hard to find opponent but because chess set is more expensive then other board games.
B. Irrelevant.
C.Tennis is not discussed in the stimulus
D. Explains why children must play chess but doesn't undermine conclusion.
E. So what?


Even I went with option A with the same reasoning. Can someone explain how C is correct?

I searched this question in other forums and found an explanation for C. So C is correct because it says that "young players prefer to play tennis and not chess and this is why a few young people prefer chess to tennis". Well sounds well but i still think that A could be an answer too because it offers alternative explanation. Would like to know the source of this question.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 16,754
Own Kudos:
51,993
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,342
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 16,754
Kudos: 51,993
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

Because tennis and chess both require a suitable opponent and tennis is flourishing, there must be some other reason why kids don’t play chess.

Choice A is a knock against chess, but it doesn’t address the premise about finding someone to play with; neither does B. Whether chess is a useful activity is not relevant, so D is out.

E is bad for two reasons: (1) we have no data to compare, so we don’t know if the number is rising or falling, and (2) we don’t know that all sets that were purchased are being used. C is the Answer

Hope it Helps
User avatar
PSP92
Joined: 03 Sep 2018
Last visit: 13 Jun 2024
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 300
Location: India
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 96
Kudos: 27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994
Official Explanation

Source: Princeton Review
Difficulty Level: 750

Because tennis and chess both require a suitable opponent and tennis is flourishing, there must be some other reason why kids don’t play chess. Choice A is a knock against chess, but it doesn’t address the premise about finding someone to play with; neither does B. Whether chess is a useful activity is not relevant, so D is out. E is bad for two reasons: (1) we have no data to compare, so we don’t know if the number is rising or falling, and (2) we don’t know that all sets that were purchased are being used. C is the Answer

Hope it Helps
I have a doubt here.
Option-C : I am having a hard time understanding the comparison between Chess and Tennis. If tennis already has many more people playing the sport than chess then it could be easier to find an opponent in tennis than in Chess. The argument already tells us that few people play chess.
I chose option B as the answer because if one can play chess against computers then one does not need to look for a suitable opponent. This weakens the conclusion.
My reasoning could be completed off the track though. Any help will be appreciated.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,432
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,432
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
513 posts
363 posts