Last visit was: 20 Nov 2025, 00:17 It is currently 20 Nov 2025, 00:17
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
venksune
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Last visit: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 507
Own Kudos:
Posts: 507
Kudos: 160
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
smarty_cry
Joined: 24 Sep 2003
Last visit: 12 Sep 2005
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Location: India
Posts: 17
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gayathri
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Last visit: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 364
Own Kudos:
Posts: 364
Kudos: 502
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ruhi
Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Last visit: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 186
Own Kudos:
Location: Missouri, USA
Posts: 186
Kudos: 863
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I pick B.

Since most of the students at charter schools were performing badly at schools (as given by this statement), it is clear that the researcher's study is supported.

As far as D is concerned, its not necessary that the students in the charter schools were preciously studying in some other school. Most of these students can be new also. So this choice doesnt strengthen the researcher's study.
User avatar
qhoc0010
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Last visit: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 456
Own Kudos:
Posts: 456
Kudos: 1,575
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(B) sounds better. Two things in (B): students transfer to charter schools -> new students with bad performance, already bad performed students -> contribute more to the study.
User avatar
doggita
Joined: 21 Jul 2004
Last visit: 12 Oct 2005
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
Posts: 65
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I would go with D. B seems to provide a different explanation...
User avatar
foraj
Joined: 26 Nov 2004
Last visit: 27 Jan 2005
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Posts: 23
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
go with D, i think that since the researchers think that the performance will fall with changing schools, along with the studies of these schools only 6 month old. It supports the conclusion.
User avatar
venksune
Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Last visit: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 507
Own Kudos:
Posts: 507
Kudos: 160
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D is the OA.

The OE is:
The conclusion that the act of changing schools is responsible for lower student performance relies on the assumption that the badly-performing students had in fact moved from a public school to a charter school. This is never made explicit, although the researchers’ conclusion depends on this being the case. The fact that most of the charter schools studied just opened would bolster this assumption, since students at these new charter schools must have enrolled in them recently. Choice (D) thus strengthens the argument by reinforcing its main assumption. Choice (A) is incorrect because the distinction between urban and rural students has no discernible impact on the distinction between public and charter schools. Choice (B) is incorrect because it does not in any way address the effect of changing schools, which is at the heart of the argument. Choice (C), if anything, weakens the researchers’ explanation by suggesting that at least in some cases, changing schools improved performance. As for choice (E), fundraising efforts are at least one step removed from the issue of student performance, although one could even argue that choice (E) weakens the argument by providing an alternative explanation for charter schools’ relatively poor performance—less money for teachers and materials.
User avatar
ruhi
Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Last visit: 31 Jan 2010
Posts: 186
Own Kudos:
Location: Missouri, USA
Posts: 186
Kudos: 863
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks for that reasoning Venksune. now I get the basic flaw in my choice. Even those new students must have 'changed' schools.. leaving out kids in Nursery... :oops:



Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts