GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Feb 2019, 04:26

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Free GMAT RC Webinar

February 23, 2019

February 23, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Learn reading strategies that can help even non-voracious reader to master GMAT RC. Saturday, February 23rd at 7 AM PT
• ### FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

February 24, 2019

February 24, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.

# A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was institu

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 06 May 2012
Posts: 58
A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was institu  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 10 Oct 2018, 23:34
1
11
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

60% (01:38) correct 40% (01:42) wrong based on 793 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was instituted last year. The program was clearly a success. Last year, the incidence of students smoking on school premises decreased by over 70 percent.

Which of the following assumptions underlies the argument in the passage?

(A) Cigarettes are detrimental to one’s health; once people understand this, they will quit smoking

(B) The doubling of the price of a pack of cigarettes last year was not the only cause of the student’s altered smoking habits.

(C) The teachers chosen to lead the anti-smoking education program were the most effective teachers in the school system

(D) The number of cigarettes smoked each day by those students who continued to smoke last year did not greatly increase.

(E) School policy enforcers were less vigilant in seeking out smokers last year than they were in previous years

"A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program" Weaken Question

Originally posted by gmatchase on 18 Nov 2012, 10:43.
Last edited by Bunuel on 10 Oct 2018, 23:34, edited 3 times in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 265
Schools: LBS '14 (A\$)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Re: A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was institu  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2012, 08:37
Hi, So here is my thought process behind this....

A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was instituted last year. The program was clearly a success. Last year, the incidence of students smoking on school premises decreased by over 70 percent.

So argument is an anti smoking education programme caused a drop in smoking in school.

Which of the following assumptions underlies the argument in the passage?

So what do we need to assume for the argument to be true, but is not mentioned above.

(A) Cigarettes are detrimental to one’s health; once people understand this, they will quit smoking No, you don't need to assume this. It's out of context in this passage - you could easily hold this argument with knowing this

(B) The doubling of the price of a pack of cigarettes last year was not the only cause of the student’s altered smoking habits. Yes this does seem like something I need to know, as if there was this price rise, without knowing the results, we could easily assume this was the only reason for the decline.

(C) The teachers chosen to lead the anti-smoking education program were the most effective teachers in the school system No, we don't need to know this. Even less effective teachers could have an effect.

(D) The number of cigarettes smoked each day by those students who continued to smoke last year did not greatly increase.Not for me. I can easily hold the argument without knowing this or not.

(E) School policy enforcers were less vigilant in seeking out smokers last year than they were in previous yearsNo. This actually weakens the argument if true. The reason for the drop could be simply a drop in catching people, not a drop in smoking
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8893
Location: Pune, India
Re: A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was institu  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Apr 2013, 07:53
4
gmatchase wrote:
A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was instituted last year. The program was clearly a success. Last year, the incidence of students smoking on school premises decreased by over 70 percent.

Which of the following assumptions underlies the argument in the passage?

(A) Cigarettes are detrimental to one’s health; once people understand this, they will quit smoking
(B) The doubling of the price of a pack of cigarettes last year was not the only cause of the student’s altered smoking habits.
(C) The teachers chosen to lead the anti-smoking education program were the most effective teachers in the school system
(D) The number of cigarettes smoked each day by those students who continued to smoke last year did not greatly increase.
(E) School policy enforcers were less vigilant in seeking out smokers last year than they were in previous years

Responding to a pm:

First step is to analyze the argument.

Premises:
- A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was instituted last year.
- Last year, the incidence of students smoking on school premises decreased by over 70 percent.

Conclusion: The program was clearly a success.

Ok, so the conclusion seems a little far fetched, isn't it? Just because the anti-smoking program was instituted last year and the incidence of smoking decreased last year, doesn't necessarily mean that the program was responsible for the decrease. Right? There could another cause. We are assuming that the program was responsible for the decrease.

Look at the options now.

Option (B) The doubling of the price of a pack of cigarettes last year was not the only cause of the student’s altered smoking habits.

We are assuming that the program was the cause of the student's altered smoking habits i.e. some other thing was certainly not the ONLY cause. If there is a confusion, try to negate it.

The doubling of the price was the only cause of the student’s altered smoking habits.

Now our conclusion just cannot hold. If doubling the price was the ONLY cause, the program cannot be responsible for the decrease. Hence (B) is the assumption.

Notice that (E) is not the assumption.
(E) School policy enforcers were less vigilant in seeking out smokers last year than they were in previous years.
If we negate it, we get

School policy enforcers were not less vigilant in seeking out smokers last year

Our conclusion can still hold. The school policy enforcers were the way they are every year or perhaps they were more vigilant, either way, it is still possible that the program is responsible for the decrease in smoking.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Intern
Joined: 16 Jul 2015
Posts: 40
GMAT 1: 580 Q37 V33
GMAT 2: 580 Q39 V31
GMAT 3: 560 Q40 V28
GMAT 4: 580 Q37 V32
GMAT 5: 680 Q45 V37
GMAT 6: 690 Q47 V37
Re: A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was institu  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2016, 20:06
Please clarify if my thoughts are valid.
I began to prethink the assumption that the decrease in no of students smoking on school premises is not sufficient to say that the program worked as students could be smoking outside school premises.Thus I got caught up in option D.
I know option B is the most suitable option,however I am not sure why D is not the correct option
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8893
Location: Pune, India
Re: A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was institu  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2016, 21:02
1
bhamini1 wrote:
Please clarify if my thoughts are valid.
I began to prethink the assumption that the decrease in no of students smoking on school premises is not sufficient to say that the program worked as students could be smoking outside school premises.Thus I got caught up in option D.
I know option B is the most suitable option,however I am not sure why D is not the correct option

We don't know exactly what the program was supposed to achieve. Was it supposed to decrease the number of smokers or was it supposed to decrease the number of cigarettes consumed per smoker or both?

Negating D:
The number of cigarettes smoked each day by those students who continued to smoke last year did greatly increase.

It says that people who continued to smoke started smoking many more cigarettes. If the aim of the program was to reduce the number of smokers, the program could have been a success. If the program's aim was 'both' (above), it could have been successful.
Hence, it is possible that the conclusion could still hold.

If we negate (B), definitely conclusion doesn't hold. Hence answer is (B)
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 53066
Re: A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was institu  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2018, 23:31
gmatchase wrote:
A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was instituted last year. The program was clearly a success. Last year, the incidence of students smoking on school premises decreased by over 70 percent.

Which of the following assumptions underlies the argument in the passage?

(A) Cigarettes are detrimental to one’s health; once people understand this, they will quit smoking

(B) The doubling of the price of a pack of cigarettes last year was not the only cause of the student’s altered smoking habits.

(C) The teachers chosen to lead the anti-smoking education program were the most effective teachers in the school system

(D) The number of cigarettes smoked each day by those students who continued to smoke last year did not greatly increase.

(E) School policy enforcers were less vigilant in seeking out smokers last year than they were in previous years

Official Explanation:

B

The argument presented is a causal argument. The significant underlying assumption of the argument, therefore, relates to the causal link between the anti-smoking education program and the reduction in smoking on school premises. The argument assumes that the program, and not some other set of circumstances, caused the reduction. It thus assumes that other possible causes— such as an increase in the price of cigarettes— were not substantial contributors to this result. Process of Elimination is effective on this question, as it is on all Critical Reasoning questions. Because the argument hinges on one crucial piece of evidence— a decrease in the incidence of smoking on school premises— you can eliminate all answers that do not speak directly to that reduction. Thus you can eliminate (A), (C), and (D). Choice (E), if true, would weaken the argument and therefore cannot be correct. The best answer is (B).
_________________
Manager
Joined: 29 Sep 2016
Posts: 70
A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was institu  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2018, 16:26
gmatchase wrote:
A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was instituted last year. The program was clearly a success. Last year, the incidence of students smoking on school premises decreased by over 70 percent.

Which of the following assumptions underlies the argument in the passage?

(A) Cigarettes are detrimental to one’s health; once people understand this, they will quit smoking
(B) The doubling of the price of a pack of cigarettes last year was not the only cause of the student’s altered smoking habits.
(C) The teachers chosen to lead the anti-smoking education program were the most effective teachers in the school system
(D) The number of cigarettes smoked each day by those students who continued to smoke last year did not greatly increase.
(E) School policy enforcers were less vigilant in seeking out smokers last year than they were in previous years

Responding to a pm:

First step is to analyze the argument.

Premises:
- A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was instituted last year.
- Last year, the incidence of students smoking on school premises decreased by over 70 percent.

Conclusion: The program was clearly a success.

Ok, so the conclusion seems a little far fetched, isn't it? Just because the anti-smoking program was instituted last year and the incidence of smoking decreased last year, doesn't necessarily mean that the program was responsible for the decrease. Right? There could another cause. We are assuming that the program was responsible for the decrease.

Look at the options now.

Option (B) The doubling of the price of a pack of cigarettes last year was not the only cause of the student’s altered smoking habits.

We are assuming that the program was the cause of the student's altered smoking habits i.e. some other thing was certainly not the ONLY cause. If there is a confusion, try to negate it.

The doubling of the price was the only cause of the student’s altered smoking habits.

Now our conclusion just cannot hold. If doubling the price was the ONLY cause, the program cannot be responsible for the decrease. Hence (B) is the assumption.

Notice that (E) is not the assumption.
(E) School policy enforcers were less vigilant in seeking out smokers last year than they were in previous years.
If we negate it, we get

School policy enforcers were not less vigilant in seeking out smokers last year

Our conclusion can still hold. The school policy enforcers were the way they are every year or perhaps they were more vigilant, either way, it is still possible that the program is responsible for the decrease in smoking.

Hi Karishma & Plumber250,

Although I also marked B, I struggled to eliminate E.

Conclusion - The program(EDUCATION) was clearly a success

Premise says that the school had conducted an EDUCATION PROGRAM. It means that they wanted to make student quit smoking by educating them NOT BY OTHER MEANS(counselling, penalising, punishing etc. after catching the students smoking).

If we negate E, the conclusion falls apart. Negating E means that since the staff was vigilant, the school became successful. Hence, the education program did not make the school successful, vigilance did.

E can't be easily eliminated.

Am I missing something!
Intern
Joined: 27 Oct 2018
Posts: 44
Re: A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was institu  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2019, 22:19
The argument is basically that the anti-smoking education program was a success.

A is not correct, it is outside the scope of the passage. The same can be said for C. Also, since we are basing this argument off of the decreased incidences of on premise smoking (the results of the program), the effectiveness of the implementation does not matter. D is not relevant. E actually weakens the argument since if the policy enforcers were less vigilant, it is possible that the number of students smoking did not drop, just fewer were caught. B is the right answer, since it informs us that another major factor that could have lead to the drop in on premise smoking, was not the only factor.
Re: A system-wide county school anti-smoking education program was institu   [#permalink] 02 Feb 2019, 22:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by