It is currently 21 Mar 2018, 13:41

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 21 May 2011
Posts: 236
A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2011, 13:17
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

60% (01:22) correct 40% (01:21) wrong based on 155 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops showed that Brazilian yields are 68% of Canadian yields when compared on the basis of per planted acre. However, Brazilian yields are 115% of Canadian yields when measured per agricultural acre.

Based on this information, which of the following can most reliably be inferred about Brazilian and Canadian agriculture over this time period?

A greater percentage of Canadian agricultural acreage was unplanted than of Brazilian agricultural acreage.
A majority of Canadian acreage is unplanted.
More total acres were unplanted in Canada than in Brazil.
Brazil had more acres planted than unplanted while Canada has more acres unplanted than planted.
Brazil produced more total crops than Canada.
VP
Status: Top MBA Admissions Consultant
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 1354
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V48
GRE 1: 1540 Q800 V740
Re: CR - 700 level - Agriculture [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2011, 21:59
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The answer is (A).

Lets set up the answer first, before we evaluate the possible answer choices. Yield is the amount of crop grown on a piece of land. When compared on a per planted acre basis, crops in Brazil have much lower yield (68%) when compared by crops in Canada. However, when compared on a per agricultural acre basis, Brazilian crops have a higher (115%) yield than Canadian crops.

Now lets evaluate the answer choices.

(A): CORRECT. If Brazilian crops have a lower planted yield than Canadian crops, then the only way for Brazilian crops to have a greater agricultural yield is if a greater portion of every agricultural acre is planted in Brazil than it is in Canada. Imagine this: if both Brazilian crops and Canadian crops had the same planted yield, and Brazil had a greater agricultural yield, we would conclude that this must be because a greater proportion of every acre is planted in Brazil than in Canada. Since the Brazilian planted yield is less than the Canadian yield, this must certainly be true.
(B): This is the wrong inference. It is possible that a majority of acreage in Canada is planted - the only truth, as we saw, is that on a per agricultural acre basis, Canada has a lesser percentage of its acreage planted than Brazil does. It is possible that Canada has 80% of its acreage planted while Brazil has 95% of its acreage planted. Would you call 80% less than a majority? No.
(C): This cannot be inferred. The question discusses yields on a per agricultural acre basis. There is no mention of the total acres of unplanted acreage in Canada or Brazil. It is possible that Canada has a greater number of total planted acres than Brazil does - only they are more sparsely planted than the Brazilian ones. Incorrect.
(D): This is the wrong inference following the logic in option (C) above. Incorrect.
(E): This cannot be inferred - it is possible that Canada produced more crops, even if by using its land less efficiently. Incorrect.
_________________

GyanOne | Top MBA Rankings and MBA Admissions Blog

Top MBA Admissions Consulting | Top MiM Admissions Consulting

Premium MBA Essay Review|Best MBA Interview Preparation|Exclusive GMAT coaching

Get a FREE Detailed MBA Profile Evaluation | Call us now +91 98998 31738

Manager
Status: Applying for 2012 B school admissions
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Posts: 125
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V35
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V44
GPA: 3.6
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: CR - 700 level - Agriculture [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Aug 2011, 23:36
+1 A, on the lines of explanation given by GyanOne.
_________________

cheers
Mayank
My GMAT Journey: 720 + dare = 760

Intern
Joined: 07 May 2011
Posts: 39
Re: CR - 700 level - Agriculture [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Dec 2012, 18:08
1
This post received
KUDOS
If you draw a diagram for this as you are reading the stimulus, it's a lot easier to see what's going on without getting entangled in the per planted, per agricultural acreage mumbo jumbo.

Draw two big boxes representing Brazil and Canada's agricultural acreage (agricultural acreage is bound to be bigger than planted acreage). Inside the Brazil box, draw five smaller boxes representing planted acres and write 68 (representing crops yielded) on each of them. Similarly, draw three smaller boxes inside Canada's big box and write 100 (crops yielded) on each. this is what the stimulus is saying. that per planted acre, brazil yields only 68% of canada's per planted yield. but in terms of the bigger box or agricultural acreage, brazil yields more than canada. so what is the question saying? there is just more planted acres in brazil than in canada. if u look at per planted acre, u see that canada yields more, but if u look at the total crops produced, brazil wins by virtue of it having more planted acres.

Armed with this understanding, you can attack the choices.

A. this is in line with our understanding. definitely a contender if not THE answer.
B. a majority of canadian.... majority? this is not descriptive enough. FAIL.
C. more total acres were unplanted in Can than Bra. close but total acres? it's trying to be tricky. we are talking about planted and agricultural acres and now total acres just brings the whole of the land mass into picture. Vague, beyond, irrelevant, whatever. FAIL.
D. Sounds reasonable but the second part of this choice- canada has more unplanted than planted- is saying too much and also it says "acres" doesn't specify agricultural or planted. FAIL.
E. This sounds reasonable but the stimulus talks in terms of percentage- that brazil yields 68% less per PA but 115% more per AA. but the numbers that form the base for those percentages are unclear. this becomes that data sufficiency question where both statement 1 and 2 are together insufficient.
Hence A.
Hope this helps.

GyanOne wrote:
The answer is (A).

Lets set up the answer first, before we evaluate the possible answer choices. Yield is the amount of crop grown on a piece of land. When compared on a per planted acre basis, crops in Brazil have much lower yield (68%) when compared by crops in Canada. However, when compared on a per agricultural acre basis, Brazilian crops have a higher (115%) yield than Canadian crops.

Now lets evaluate the answer choices.

(A): CORRECT. If Brazilian crops have a lower planted yield than Canadian crops, then the only way for Brazilian crops to have a greater agricultural yield is if a greater portion of every agricultural acre is planted in Brazil than it is in Canada. Imagine this: if both Brazilian crops and Canadian crops had the same planted yield, and Brazil had a greater agricultural yield, we would conclude that this must be because a greater proportion of every acre is planted in Brazil than in Canada. Since the Brazilian planted yield is less than the Canadian yield, this must certainly be true.
(B): This is the wrong inference. It is possible that a majority of acreage in Canada is planted - the only truth, as we saw, is that on a per agricultural acre basis, Canada has a lesser percentage of its acreage planted than Brazil does. It is possible that Canada has 80% of its acreage planted while Brazil has 95% of its acreage planted. Would you call 80% less than a majority? No.
(C): This cannot be inferred. The question discusses yields on a per agricultural acre basis. There is no mention of the total acres of unplanted acreage in Canada or Brazil. It is possible that Canada has a greater number of total planted acres than Brazil does - only they are more sparsely planted than the Brazilian ones. Incorrect.
(D): This is the wrong inference following the logic in option (C) above. Incorrect.
(E): This cannot be inferred - it is possible that Canada produced more crops, even if by using its land less efficiently. Incorrect.
Manager
Status: Student
Joined: 26 Aug 2013
Posts: 247
Location: France
Concentration: Finance, General Management
Schools: EMLYON FT'16
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V32
GPA: 3.44
Re: A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2013, 14:42
Thx you grumpytesttaker ! Your explication helped me a lot ! +1 Kudos !
_________________

Think outside the box

Intern
Affiliations: Member Senate UoP
Joined: 05 Jul 2011
Posts: 4
Location: Peshawar
Schools: Harvard
Re: A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2013, 03:31
bschool83 wrote:
A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops showed that Brazilian yields are 68% of Canadian yields when compared on the basis of per planted acre. However, Brazilian yields are 115% of Canadian yields when measured per agricultural acre.

Based on this information, which of the following can most reliably be inferred about Brazilian and Canadian agriculture over this time period?

A greater percentage of Canadian agricultural acreage was unplanted than of Brazilian agricultural acreage.
A majority of Canadian acreage is unplanted.
More total acres were unplanted in Canada than in Brazil.
Brazil had more acres planted than unplanted while Canada has more acres unplanted than planted.
Brazil produced more total crops than Canada.

Very good job guys!!!

I just want to know what's your reason to dismiss D as an option.
Intern
Joined: 06 Feb 2014
Posts: 43
Location: United States
GPA: 4
WE: Operations (Aerospace and Defense)
Re: A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2014, 18:20
SUK123 wrote:
bschool83 wrote:
A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops showed that Brazilian yields are 68% of Canadian yields when compared on the basis of per planted acre. However, Brazilian yields are 115% of Canadian yields when measured per agricultural acre.

Based on this information, which of the following can most reliably be inferred about Brazilian and Canadian agriculture over this time period?

A greater percentage of Canadian agricultural acreage was unplanted than of Brazilian agricultural acreage.
A majority of Canadian acreage is unplanted.
More total acres were unplanted in Canada than in Brazil.
Brazil had more acres planted than unplanted while Canada has more acres unplanted than planted.
Brazil produced more total crops than Canada.

Very good job guys!!!

I just want to know what's your reason to dismiss D as an option.

Same question here. How did we reason out option D? Even though I got the answer right, D slowed me down significantly. I was stuck on this for over 280 seconds!

Here's my reasoning for this one:
B = 0.68% C (in terms of planted acre)
B = 1.15% C (in terms of agricultural acre)

So it must be that B's yield is lower (lower yield per planted acre), but also that B must be planting/cultivating more land since it's producing more than C (higher output than C). With this information, I deduce that A must be true --> "A greater percentage of Canadian agricultural acreage was unplanted than of Brazilian agricultural acreage."

Now, what about D --> "Brazil had more acres planted than unplanted while Canada has more acres unplanted than planted."

In other words, Brazil's %Planted (Planted / Unplanted) is greater than Canada's % Planted --> Given B = 1.15% C.
Doesn't second part of the argument confirm this? Can someone help explain why my reasoning is flawed? much appreciated...

Thanks.
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2693
Re: A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Oct 2017, 12:23
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Re: A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops   [#permalink] 23 Oct 2017, 12:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# A ten-year comparison between Brazilian and Canadian crops

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.