It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 03:53

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of

Author Message
Director
Joined: 01 Feb 2003
Posts: 842

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 0

A theory is either true or false. Galileo s observations of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2005, 16:45
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

A theory is either true or false. Galileoâ€™s observations of Jupiterâ€™s satellites showed that the Ptolemaic theory of the motion of celestial bodies is false. Therefore, since the Copernican theory of planetary motion is inconsistent with the Ptolemaic account, Galileoâ€™s observations of Jupiterâ€™s satellites proved the truth of the Copernican theory.
The argument above is open to the objection that it makes the questionable assumption that
A. whoever first observed something inconsistent with the truth of the Ptolemaic theory should be credited with having proved that theory false
B. there are some possible observations that would be inconsistent with the account given by the Copernican theory but consistent with the account given by the Ptolemaic theory
C. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be based on exactly the same evidence
D. numerous counterexamples were necessary in order to show the Ptolemaic theory to be false
E. the Ptolemaic and Copernican theories, being inconsistent, cannot both be false

Last edited by Vithal on 11 Jun 2005, 19:37, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 122 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Posts: 81

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Location: New York City

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2005, 17:44
E it is.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2005, 18:11
E my take also.

Kudos [?]: 170 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 May 2005
Posts: 270

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Location: Auckland, New Zealand

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2005, 18:50
Definitely E

Kudos [?]: 17 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 76

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2005, 20:50
E.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 18 Apr 2005
Posts: 543

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

Location: Canuckland

### Show Tags

12 Jun 2005, 01:21
E. if one theory is refuted, the other one must be true. The argument leaves no space for other alternatives.

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

12 Jun 2005, 01:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by