Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
18 Nov 2012, 22:55
Kudos
Bookmarks
According to Manhattan GMAT, the following are incorrect. Could someone please explain them to me?
"Following the gold rush, the mining town collapsed." (The correct version is "After the gold rush, the mining town collapsed.")
"We adopted new policies with the aim to reduce theft." (The correct versions are "We adopted new policies aimed at reducing theft" and "We adopted procedures with the aim of reducing theft.")
"When compared to horses, zebras are viscous." (The correct versions are "In comparison with (or to) horses, zebras are viscous", "A zebra can be compared to a horse in many ways", and Compared with a horse, however, a zebra is very hard to tame.")
I am a native English speaker, and these sound correct to me, but I am obviously missing something.
"Following the gold rush, the mining town collapsed." (The correct version is "After the gold rush, the mining town collapsed.")
"We adopted new policies with the aim to reduce theft." (The correct versions are "We adopted new policies aimed at reducing theft" and "We adopted procedures with the aim of reducing theft.")
"When compared to horses, zebras are viscous." (The correct versions are "In comparison with (or to) horses, zebras are viscous", "A zebra can be compared to a horse in many ways", and Compared with a horse, however, a zebra is very hard to tame.")
I am a native English speaker, and these sound correct to me, but I am obviously missing something.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
19 Nov 2012, 18:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
I'm happy to help with these. 
"Following the gold rush, the mining town collapsed." (The correct version is "After the gold rush, the mining town collapsed.")
Technically, the word "following" is a participle, and therefore it should "touch" the noun that is doing the following. Thus,
"Following the dog act, the pony act was a disappointment."
The pony act is the actually think that "followed", that did the "following."
In the sentence above --- yes, that sentence would pass as perfectly correct in colloquial language but technically, the "mining town" did not perform the action of "following" anything.
"We adopted new policies with the aim to reduce theft." (The correct versions are "We adopted new policies aimed at reducing theft" and "We adopted procedures with the aim of reducing theft.")
To "aim at" is correct.
To speak of an "aim of doing X" is correct.
The construction "aim" + "to" is technically not correct. Again, you will hear this in colloquial speech, but that's no guide --- colloquial speech is littered with errors. I don't know that I can "explain" anything besides making the rule clear.
"When compared to horses, zebras are viscous." (The correct versions are "In comparison with (or to) horses, zebras are viscous", "A zebra can be compared to a horse in many ways", and "Compared with a horse, however, a zebra is very hard to tame.")
First of all, I believe the word you want is
vicious -- wild, dangerous, not easily tamed,
and not
viscous --- (of a fluid) thick, syrupy, not easily flowing
The first one makes the famous "missing verb" mistake. The GMAT brutally punishes the following construction
[conjunction][participial phrase]
You see, a conjunction (like "when") must be followed by a full bonafide noun + verb clause, NOT simply a participial phrase. See these blog articles:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/participle ... -the-gmat/
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... b-mistake/
Thus, the construction would have to be "When they are compared to horses, etc.", but that's now awkwardly long and indirect.
Does all this make sense? Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Mike
"Following the gold rush, the mining town collapsed." (The correct version is "After the gold rush, the mining town collapsed.")
Technically, the word "following" is a participle, and therefore it should "touch" the noun that is doing the following. Thus,
"Following the dog act, the pony act was a disappointment."
The pony act is the actually think that "followed", that did the "following."
In the sentence above --- yes, that sentence would pass as perfectly correct in colloquial language but technically, the "mining town" did not perform the action of "following" anything.
"We adopted new policies with the aim to reduce theft." (The correct versions are "We adopted new policies aimed at reducing theft" and "We adopted procedures with the aim of reducing theft.")
To "aim at" is correct.
To speak of an "aim of doing X" is correct.
The construction "aim" + "to" is technically not correct. Again, you will hear this in colloquial speech, but that's no guide --- colloquial speech is littered with errors. I don't know that I can "explain" anything besides making the rule clear.
"When compared to horses, zebras are viscous." (The correct versions are "In comparison with (or to) horses, zebras are viscous", "A zebra can be compared to a horse in many ways", and "Compared with a horse, however, a zebra is very hard to tame.")
First of all, I believe the word you want is
vicious -- wild, dangerous, not easily tamed,
and not
viscous --- (of a fluid) thick, syrupy, not easily flowing
The first one makes the famous "missing verb" mistake. The GMAT brutally punishes the following construction
[conjunction][participial phrase]
You see, a conjunction (like "when") must be followed by a full bonafide noun + verb clause, NOT simply a participial phrase. See these blog articles:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/participle ... -the-gmat/
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... b-mistake/
Thus, the construction would have to be "When they are compared to horses, etc.", but that's now awkwardly long and indirect.
Does all this make sense? Please let me know if you have any further questions.
Mike
21 Nov 2012, 10:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
Thank you for the help. The last one about zebras still does not make sense to me. How is the first missing a verb? I thought "are" is a verb.
