Bunuel
According to many acclaimed historians, Roman emperor Caligula was praised during his lifetime for his noble and benevolent activities,
was tainted after his death because of his extravagance and cruelty and was never revived again.A. was tainted after his death because of his extravagance and cruelty and was never revived again.
B. his fame was tainted after his death because of his extravagance and cruelty and never revived.
C. but his fame was tainted after his death because of his extravagance and cruelty and never revived.
D. but whose fame was tainted after his death because of his extravagance and cruelty and was never revived.
E. but was tainted after his death because of his extravagance and cruelty and never revived.
Project SC Butler
For SC butler Questions Click Here Fresh Verbal Question From GMAT Club Tests'. Written by sayantanc2k GMAT CLUB TESTS' OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:
A. This option implies that Caligula was tainted and was never revived - this construction does not make sense. It is meant that Caligula’s fame (and not Caligula himself) was tainted and never revived. The word “again” is redundant.
B. Grammatically wrong - two independent clauses, 1. “Caligula was praised…” and 2. “ his fame was tainted… and never revived” are separated by a comma; a conjunction is required to join two independent clauses.
C. CORRECT. Meaning is correctly conveyed - It was caligula’s fame ( not caligula) that was tainted and never revived. Moreover two independent clauses are correctly joined by the conjunction “but”.
D. The relative pronoun “whose” introduces the dependent clause “whose fame was tainted…”, which is joined to the independent clause “Caligula was praised” by the conjunction “but”. A dependent clause and an independent clause are separated by a comma, not a conjunction.
E. This option implies that Caligula was tainted and was never revived - this construction does not make sense. It is meant that Caligula’s fame (and not Caligula himself) was tainted and never revived.