winskc wrote:
According to some botanists, invasive plants are the second most serious
threat, after habitat loss, to native species of plants and animals and to the maintenance of biologically diverse ecosystems.
A. threat, after habitat loss, to native species of plants and animals and to the maintenance of biologically diverse ecosystems
B. threat, after habitat loss, to native species of plants and animals and for maintaining biologically diverse ecosystems
Arvind42 wrote:
generis - Could you help me on this. Stuck between A and B.
Is threat to native species and for maintaining" not parallel?
Arvind42 , you asked about parallelism.
Before we consider parallelism, we should eliminate (B) because it is not idiomatic.
The correct idiom in this context is
X is a threat TO something, not X is a threat
FOR something.
• idiom: threat TO not
threat forTwo examples of questions that test "threat" are below the spoiler.
Spoiler alert: if you click on the linked
official questions, you will probably know the answer based on this post.
HERE, #1HERE, #2 (B) is incorrect because
threat for is not idiomatic.
• parallelismI am not sure I understand what you are asking. I think your question might be, "Irrespective of idiom, are the noun phrase
native species of plants and animals and the gerund phrase
maintaining biologically diverse ecosystems parallel?"
Answer: No.
It's a good question. I see a lot of confusion about gerunds, nouns, and parallelism.
Rather than just say "No, option B is not parallel because XYZ," instead I'll use some examples so that perhaps a little bit of understandable confusion gets cleared up.
Rather than analyze (B) separately, we can compare (A) and (B).
Option A uses two noun phrases:
native species of plants and animals and
the maintenance of biologically diverse ecosystemsOption B, by contrast, uses a noun phrase (
native species . . . ) and a gerund phrase (
maintaining biologically diverse ecosystems).
-- If a dedicated noun exists, GMAC prefers that noun to an ___ING noun (a gerund, a verbING noun).
-- The dedicated noun is
maintenance (in option A). The ___ING noun is
maintaining (in B).
On the GMAT, for example, the voters'
approval is better than the voters'
approving. In
OG 2020 SC # 835, the official explanation mentions the preference. Spoiler alert: 1 answer of 5 revealed.
D) In experimenting designed to provide information ultimately proving useful to XYZ . . .
OE: The use of the [verbING] verbal noun experimenting is less idiomatic than experiments.
In SC #842 of the same book, a noun and a gerund are deemed "not parallel" in three answers.
Spoiler alert: those three are revealed.[A chemist presented the results of his experiments] in his book, "Essay on Heat and Light,"
B) a critique of all chemistry following R.B. and also his envisioning of a
OE: Critique and his envisioning are not parallel
C) a critique of all chemistry after R.B. and envisioning as well as
OE: The two descriptors [critique and envisioning] are not parallel
D) critiquing all chemistry from R.B. forward and also a vision of
OE: The two descriptors [critiquing and vision] are not parallel
The OE for SC # 895, option (D) explains that a gerund and noun are not parallel.
Spoiler alert: 1 answer of 5 revealed. OE for option (D): This [option's] use of the gerund vaccinating (followed by of) would normally be preceded by the [if the word were supposed to be a noun], but [using THE] would make the phrase awkward. It would be preferable to use vaccination, which is parallel to extermination.
In other words, even if vaccinating were a complex gerund preceded by THE, and even though complex gerunds may be parallel with action nouns such as extermination, the dedicated noun form vaccination is preferred.
Finally, see
OG VR 2020 #304. In that question, 2 of 5 options were not parallel because a list of four items included three noun phrases and an __ING noun. (The OE writer calls it a participle.) Spoiler alert - 2 answers revealed.
Early administrative decisions in China’s Ming Dynasty eventually caused a drastic fall in tax revenues, a reduction in military preparedness, the collapse of the currency system, and failed to make sufficient investment in vital transportation infrastructure.
B. the collapse of the currency system, and failing
D. the collapse of the currency system, as well as failing
OE for both B and D: The list of three effects is not parallel since the first three items are noun phrases but the fourth is the participle failing.
I tracked down these examples because there are occasions in which a complex gerund can be parallel with an action noun, as is the case in
Spoiler alert: if you click on the link the answer to an official question is revealed. this question, here. True,
species is not an action noun. I am seeing quite a bit of confusion about gerunds and parallelism, though.
I think the best way to understand how SC works is to study official examples. So I found some.
No. Answer B is not parallel.
I hope that helps.

P.S.
Arvind42 - At times the only kind of noun that exists for that word is an ING noun. Words such as running, writing, or painting (i.e. a picture that you hang on a wall) ARE the only nouns. In those cases, parallelism is not an issue. Beneath the spoiler is a question in which one noun ending in _ING is parallel to two other nouns that do not end in _ING because the _ING noun does not have any other form.
Spoiler alert - clicking on the link gives the answer to a question.
_________________
—The only thing more dangerous than ignorance is arrogance. ~Einstein—I stand with Ukraine.
Donate to Help Ukraine!