Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 May 2012, 07:51

5

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

48% (01:36) correct
52% (00:49) wrong based on 297 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as much as 1981.

a. twice as much as 1981

b. twice as many as 1981

c. double the figure for 1981

d. double what it was in 1981

e. a number double that of 1981’s

I know this question has been discussed on the forum previously, but i am still not sure whether i understand the question fully.

Re: According to the national science foundation [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 May 2012, 08:51

A - as much for numbers is wrong B - X, twice as many as - this is right construction. Needs the number right before twice to modify. D - 'what it was' - wordy and it has no clear referent E - 'that' has no clear referent.

Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there [#permalink]

Show Tags

30 Sep 2012, 18:10

According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as much as 1981.

a. twice as much as 1981 Incorrect comparison.

b. twice as many as 1981 Incorrect comparison.

c. double the figure for 1981 Correct

d. double what it was in 1981 Incorrect comparison.

e. a number double that of 1981’s - Not sure but i think possessive is not needed here as that (number) is already present.

Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Sep 2015, 23:12

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Sep 2016, 04:53

msvel2304 wrote:

A - as much for numbers is wrong B - X, twice as many as - this is right construction. Needs the number right before twice to modify. D - 'what it was' - wordy and it has no clear referent E - 'that' has no clear referent.

IMO C.

double is a verb. but in option c double is modifying the figure(noun). I think option C is also incorrect. please clarify.?

Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Sep 2016, 07:26

robu wrote:

msvel2304 wrote:

A - as much for numbers is wrong B - X, twice as many as - this is right construction. Needs the number right before twice to modify. D - 'what it was' - wordy and it has no clear referent E - 'that' has no clear referent.

IMO C.

double is a verb. but in option c double is modifying the figure(noun). I think option C is also incorrect. please clarify.?

Double is not used as a verb here. Please read the sentence once again, you will get to know about this.
_________________

Thanks.

Wanna say Thank you? Just hit Kudos.

gmatclubot

Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there
[#permalink]
08 Sep 2016, 07:26

Best Schools for Young MBA Applicants Deciding when to start applying to business school can be a challenge. Salary increases dramatically after an MBA, but schools tend to prefer...

Marty Cagan is founding partner of the Silicon Valley Product Group, a consulting firm that helps companies with their product strategy. Prior to that he held product roles at...