GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 21 Aug 2018, 05:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2007
Posts: 189
According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 11 Feb 2018, 01:37
10
74
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

40% (00:40) correct 60% (00:39) wrong based on 2350 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as much as 1981.

(A) twice as much as 1981

(B) twice as many as 1981

(C) double the figure for 1981

(D) double what it was in 1981

(E) a number double that of 1981’s

Originally posted by ColumbiaDream on 28 Aug 2007, 18:33.
Last edited by hazelnut on 11 Feb 2018, 01:37, edited 3 times in total.
Edited the question.
Most Helpful Expert Reply
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 13 Nov 2013
Posts: 222
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2014, 16:13
7
3
Howdy all, :)

I think that @NYCAnalyst did a nice job of clearly explaining the answer choices, so I don't want to spend a lot of time analyzing them. I'd like to talk about a specific aspect of this question. In this sentence, what is the roll of "double?"

Let's start by looking at the correct answer in the sentence:

ColumbiaDream wrote:
According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, double the figure for 1981.


So in this sentence, it's important to realize that "double" is not modifying anything. It is not an adjective. In this sentence, it is a predeterminer. To learn more about pre-determiners, you can start here, and then read the Wiki article on Combinations of Determiner. You can see here that "double" can function as a predeterminer in its definition.

We could re-write the sentence by removing the modifying phrases and simplifying some of the language to make this clear:

Quote:
In 2003, there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, double the figure for 1981.


So in this case, "double" is a predeterminer for "figure" which refers back to the 198,113 students. So what it really means is that the figure from 2003 is twice the number from 1981; it's twice as much. This is one of the reasons that (C) is the best choice. It is the most concise expression of "twice as much as the figure."

I hope that this helps everyone understand this question a little bit more. It's a tough one! :)
_________________

Kevin Rocci
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Most Helpful Community Reply
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2009
Posts: 101
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
Reviews Badge
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2012, 22:32
12
10
According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as much as 1981.

a. twice as much as 1981 comparing 198K to 1981, wrong

b. twice as many as 1981 comparing 198K to 1981, wrong

c. double the figure for 1981 ok

d. double what it was in 1981"it" is 198K or 42%? wrong

e. a number double that of 1981’s 1981 cannot be a possessive noun, wrong
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 174
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2007, 03:23
I will go wtih E as well.

I believe the comparision is between the no of students in 1981 and 2003, however owing to the insertion of the inessential modifier clause "almost ..." which only serves to describe what 198,113 means in terms of percentage, we need to clarify what we are comparing i.e. a number double..... Choice E removes any ambiguity as to what is being compared.
_________________

Regards

Subhen

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2007
Posts: 189
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2007, 09:31
6
6
Hi All,
So, this was a question from MGMAT Cat. It was in the 700-800 range. Like some of you I had put B. But OA is C.

Here is their explanation:

In the original sentence, “much” incorrectly references the quantity of female graduate students. Students are countable, so “many” is the correct term. Additionally, “as 1981” incorrectly completes the comparison, illogically comparing the number of people (the “198,113 female science and engineering graduate students”) to a year (“1981”).


Choice B- “As 1981” incorrectly completes the comparison, illogically comparing the number of people (the “198,113 female science and engineering graduate students”) to a year (“1981”).

Choice C- “Double the figure” places the emphasis on the number of female graduate students, and correctly completes the comparison between the number of people in one year (198,133 in 2003) and the number of people in another year (the figure for 1981).
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2007
Posts: 189
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2007, 10:47
2
1
Choice D is wrong because- “What it was” is wordy, awkward, and unclear. The singular pronoun "it" has no clear antecedent.

Choice E is wrong because- “Double that of 1981’s” is wordy, awkward, and unclear. The singular pronoun "that" has no clear antecedent. The possessive "1981's" is not followed by a noun to possess.

Still thinking about if " double the figure IN 1981" is correct.....
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 65
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Aug 2007, 05:07
Figure for 1981 is anytime better than Figure In 1981.

I cannot find the reasoning for this but if you pick annual reports for any good company, u'll find tons of phrases like this and comparisions of this sort involving figures and years.
Eventually Figure for.. starts sounding better. :P
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2007
Posts: 189
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Aug 2007, 09:24
I agree. I looked at the explanation again for each of the choices. And they don't seem to pick on " ..IN 1981". Therefore, i don't think it's wrong. However, given the choice between the two- I would pick " ...FOR 1981"
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2011
Posts: 102
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 530 Q42 V20
GMAT 2: 540 Q43 V28
GMAT 3: 680 Q48 V35
WE: Business Development (Hospitality and Tourism)
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 May 2012, 08:51
A - as much for numbers is wrong
B - X, twice as many as - this is right construction. Needs the number right before twice to modify.
D - 'what it was' - wordy and it has no clear referent
E - 'that' has no clear referent.

IMO C.
_________________

KUDOS - if my post has helped you.

Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2717
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2017, 08:48
ColumbiaDream wrote:
According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198,113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as much as 1981.


we are comparing # of people in 2003 with # of people in 1981.

a. twice as much as 1981
much is not correct for countable nouns. moreover, it compares # of people with a YEAR. incorrect.

b. twice as many as 1981
many is correct, but this option compares # of people with a year.

c. double the figure for 1981
looks good.

d. double what it was in 1981
it does not have an antecedent...

e. a number double that of 1981’s
not clear what the comparison is.

C looks good!
Verbal Forum Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 13 Feb 2015
Posts: 631
Premium Member
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Apr 2017, 18:13
Merged topics. Please, search before posting questions!
_________________

Please Read: Verbal Posting Rules

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 01 Jun 2015
Posts: 230
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V26
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 May 2017, 06:43
GMATNinja

Sir if I had written option E in the following way,would it be right then?

" a number doubling the figure of 1981’s"
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
User avatar
P
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 1909
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2017, 14:16
1
Top Contributor
Quote:
GMATNinja

Sir if I had written option E in the following way,would it be right then?

" a number doubling the figure of 1981’s"


Good question. This wouldn't actually be correct, mostly because it's redundant. "The figure of" already indicates a possessive, so you definitely wouldn't need 1981 (or 1981's, in this case) to be possessive, too.

A similar issue is mentioned in GMATNinjaTwo's post on page 2 of this thread: https://gmatclub.com/forum/because-of-t ... 53061.html
_________________

GMAT Club Verbal Expert | GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (Now hiring!) | GMAT blog | Food blog | Notoriously bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal
Reading Comprehension | Critical Reasoning | Sentence Correction

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars
Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations
All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply?
Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

Sentence Correction articles & resources
How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

Reading Comprehension, Critical Reasoning, and other articles & resources
All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for $29.99 | Time management on verbal

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Status: GMAT on july 13.
Joined: 10 Feb 2017
Posts: 37
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V30
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 02 Jul 2017, 02:01
In the question below

is he comparing year or the no of female grads?
Sometimes, they twist what they are trying to compare, I am not able to figure it out.

Any other similar comparison examples like this?

Originally posted by Viserion99 on 02 Jul 2017, 01:20.
Last edited by abhimahna on 02 Jul 2017, 02:01, edited 1 time in total.
Merged Topics. Please search before posting
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3690
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2017, 08:53
1
Viserion99 wrote:
In the question below

is he comparing year or the no of female grads?
Sometimes, they twist what they are trying to compare, I am not able to figure it out.

Any other similar comparison examples like this?


Hi Viserion99 ,

The author is comparing the no. of female grads.

For more information, please look at the above explanations.

Thanks
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.

New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!



Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Posts: 92
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2017, 09:33
Hi - for B ..if i was strip out the fluff and modify the number to make it easier

--- there were 100 students, twice as many as 1981 === i can see why this is wrong

--- there were 100 students, twice as many as IN 1981 === i can see why this is wrong
Senior SC Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 14 Nov 2016
Posts: 1322
Location: Malaysia
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Sep 2017, 01:36
ColumbiaDream wrote:
According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were 198, 113 female science and engineering graduate students, almost 42% of the graduate students in those fields, twice as much as 1981.

(A) twice as much as 1981

(B) twice as many as 1981

(C) double the figure for 1981

(D) double what it was in 1981

(E) a number double that of 1981’s


OFFICIAL EXPLANATION


In the original sentence, “much” incorrectly references the quantity of female graduate students. Students are countable, so “many” is the correct term. Additionally, “as 1981” incorrectly completes the comparison, illogically comparing the number of people (the “198,113 female science and engineering graduate students”) to a year (“1981”).

(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.

(B) “As 1981” incorrectly completes the comparison, illogically comparing the number of people (the “198,113 female science and engineering graduate students”) to a year (“1981”).

(C) CORRECT. “Double the figure” places the emphasis on the number of female graduate students, and correctly completes the comparison between the number of people in one year (198,133 in 2003) and the number of people in another year (the figure for 1981).

(D) “What it was” is wordy, awkward, and unclear. The singular pronoun "it" has no clear antecedent.

(E) “Double that of 1981’s” is wordy, awkward, and unclear. The singular pronoun "that" has no clear antecedent. The possessive "1981's" is not followed by a noun to possess.
_________________

"Be challenged at EVERY MOMENT."

“Strength doesn’t come from what you can do. It comes from overcoming the things you once thought you couldn’t.”

"Each stage of the journey is crucial to attaining new heights of knowledge."

Rules for posting in verbal forum | Please DO NOT post short answer in your post!

Advanced Search : https://gmatclub.com/forum/advanced-search/

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 10 Aug 2017
Posts: 18
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V41
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 14:58
hazelnut abhimahna

I go this question right, but I thought the 'figure' in the last part of the question stem was referring to the percentage of female grad students, not the number.

1. Is that interpretation wrong
2. is C still the correct answer even with my interpretation?

Thx!
Board of Directors
User avatar
V
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3690
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Oct 2017, 23:44
1
HappyQuakka wrote:
hazelnut abhimahna

I go this question right, but I thought the 'figure' in the last part of the question stem was referring to the percentage of female grad students, not the number.

1. Is that interpretation wrong
2. is C still the correct answer even with my interpretation?

Thx!


Hi HappyQuakka ,

Actually NO. The figure is referring to the count rather than the %.

It is actually wrong to say double the % for another year.

As per the meaning of the sentence, we are comparing the females in one year with females in another. We are not comparing the % of graduates in one year with % of graduates in another year.

You might have got C as the right answer with POE because all others are wrong. (This is my assumption.)

Does that make sense?
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place
Blog: Subscribe to Question of the Day Blog

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.

New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!



Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 10 Aug 2017
Posts: 18
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V41
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Oct 2017, 23:26
abhimahna Thank you for the clarification, it makes sense now. Def something I will have to watch out for on the exam!
(and yes, I did get C through POE)
Re: According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were &nbs [#permalink] 16 Oct 2017, 23:26

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 32 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

According to the National Science Foundation, in 2003 there were

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.