Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 100%
(00:38)
wrong
based on 6
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Although it is true that professional boxing may result in temporary or permanent brain damage and even death to the participants, corrective measures undertaken to minimize the risks are not appropriate if they also tend to make the sport less exciting for the spectator. The ultimate decision, of course, rests with the boxers themselves; after all, no one forces them to go into the ring
Which of the following arguments most resembles the argument above?
Laws written to improve highway safety are a waste of taxpayers’ money; after all, no one forces drivers to get behind the wheel.
No additional laws regulating occupational safety standards should be made; after all, no one forces the worker to go into the factory.
Laws designed to prevent drug abuse should not be enforced; after all, no one forces a drug user to take illicit drugs.
Federally guaranteed student loans should not be made available to college students; after all, no one forces them to go to college.
The city should no longer use public funds to hire beach lifeguards; after all, no one forces swimmers or surfers to go into dangerous waters.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
B resembles a lot. No additional laws regulating occupational safety standards should be made; after all, no one forces the worker to go into the factory.
Although it is true that professional boxing may result in temporary or permanent brain damage and even death to the participants, corrective measures undertaken to minimize the risks are not appropriate if they also tend to make the sport less exciting for the spectator. The ultimate decision, of course, rests with the boxers themselves; after all, no one forces them to go into the ring
Which of the following arguments most resembles the argument above?
Laws written to improve highway safety are a waste of taxpayers’ money; after all, no one forces drivers to get behind the wheel.
No additional laws regulating occupational safety standards should be made; after all, no one forces the worker to go into the factory.
Laws designed to prevent drug abuse should not be enforced; after all, no one forces a drug user to take illicit drugs.
Federally guaranteed student loans should not be made available to college students; after all, no one forces them to go to college.
The city should no longer use public funds to hire beach lifeguards; after all, no one forces swimmers or surfers to go into dangerous waters.
Show more
My pick is B B rightly compares the occupational hazard of boxers(t/p brain damage-stated in the stimulus)with those of factory workers. Kindly post OA Thanks!
I would say its E. The key words are: (A) "corrective measures to minimize risk" ---> 1. the measures are risk reduction/mitigation measures not risk prevention/elimination or regulation (which may maintain risk at the same level) etc.; (B) "not appropriate" --- waste of money does not mean something is "not appropriate"... things may still be appropriate in this world though they are a waste of money
A. - "waste of money" --- doesn't mean inapprop
B. - "additional" laws --- the word additional itself seems to raise a red flag - why would they stick it in there?... besides this one uses "regulate" safety stds doesn't necessarily mean risk associated with the activity in question will be reduced --- the risk may be maintained at the same level...
C. designed to "prevent" drug abuse - laws should not be enforced --- this seems more like risk elimination to me... the argument is about risk reduction
D. federally guaranteed loans non-availability does not seem to be a risk reduction measure aimed at reducing any risk for the students
E. using public $ to hire beach lifeguards seems like risk reduction to me; also the normative "should" 'no longer' seems to go with "inappropriate"
These parallel reasoning questions ask you to extract the form of the argument from the original paragraph. To do this you must spend time on the paragraph before analyzing the choices. Then try to match up the similar elements of the paragraph and the answer choices. Look at form and structure instead of wording or subject matter. The paragraph says that rather than making rules to protect the professional participants, we should let them be responsible for choosing whether to take the risk of participating. (B) presents the closest analogy to the original argument in that a worker earns a living by going into the factory in the same manner that a professional boxer earns a living by going into the ring. In both cases, safety regulations are designed for the benefit of the participants. The obvious difference is that there are no spectators for factory workers. Don’t expect the analogy to fit perfectly. A close match will suffice when you’re sure your choice is better than any other. This question is more difficult because the match isn’t perfect and the shadings among alternatives are fairly fine.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.