shanks2020
Can you please explain question 3 as to where in the passage we can say they differed? what they differed?
What is the "Union"mentioned in the passage?
3. With which of the following statements regarding Great Britain's attitude toward the American Civil War would the author most likely agree?A. British government ministers were concerned for the welfare of their former colonies but refused to become entangled in another war on the American mainland.
B. Victorian abolitionists chose to abide by the will of the Crown rather than their moral principles.
C. Lord Palmerston refused to support the Confederates until they could prove that slaves in the South were treated humanely.
D. Leaders of British industry had reservations about Lincoln's trade policies.
E. British workers and industrialists disagreed over the whether to support the Southern secessionists.
It is not an official passage and with good reason. It would be difficult to understand, though there are enough clues, in case one doesn't know anything about the American Civil War
From the passage:
and although many captains of British industry, along with some ministers in Lord Palmerston’s government, thought it best to stay in their suppliers’ good graces (Southern secessionists)...So industry leaders wanted to support the Southern secessionists
Also given:
Furthermore, many of Britain’s increasingly powerful working class vocally sided with the Union as the champion of abolition.The workers sided with the Union (not with the secessionists). Union must be all states together from which the Southern states seceded.
Hence, answer (E)
There are clues to understand these points.
Southern secessionists anticipated British cooperation from the outset, pointing to the industrial giant’s reliance on American cotton in its innumerable mills. A prewar cotton glut, however, had reduced Britain’s demand for the South’s staple crop,Southerners expected that Britishers would help them because British industry was dependent on the cotton that South produced.
Whether Victorian notions of human dignity eventually contributed to Britain’s neutrality is another question. While continuing to rely on such fruits of slavery as cotton and tobacco, Britain herself had abolished slaveryWe don't know whether Britain stayed neutral (did not help South) because they wanted to conform to notions of human dignity. Cotton and tobacco industries (in South) must have had slavery and Britain continued to rely on these products though it abolished slavery.[/quote]
KarishmaBThanks for the reply.
However, I could not understand from the passage that Secessionists are pitted against the Union.
Can you plz. let me know how would i understand from the passage this aspect.[/quote]
"Union" means all together and "secession" means to pull away from a union so that helps. As I said before, it would be hard to understand for someone who doesn't know American history and GMAT tries to ensure that there is no regional preference. That said, RC passages will always be some what content driven and you may or may not know about it. Hence, reading on various topics is important, not to recall from memory but to be able to understand when the passage mentions details.[/quote]
KarishmaBThanks for the reply. To see how could i have understood better, sorry to repeat again- Can you plz. let me know how would i understand from the passage that Secesssion were pitted against The Union? And the Union was not just a union, it was "The Union of US states"?
Or according to you, this passage has some void?[/quote]
I think you are spending too much time analysing non official questions. Invest this time and effort in official questions and you will be served much better.
Knowing what secession is, one would be able to guess from context that the union is the one from which the South states seceded. Your takeaway from this question should be to read more articles on humanities. Whether this question is within the purview of GMAT, I would think not though one never knows.