Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 21:11 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 21:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
srij13
Joined: 13 Jan 2018
Last visit: 17 Feb 2021
Posts: 30
Own Kudos:
138
 [21]
Given Kudos: 27
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 530 Q46 V17
GMAT 2: 640 Q49 V28
Products:
GMAT 2: 640 Q49 V28
Posts: 30
Kudos: 138
 [21]
Kudos
Add Kudos
20
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Alpha14
Joined: 27 Sep 2018
Last visit: 10 Apr 2020
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 31
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,292
 [2]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,292
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
1vaibhav
Joined: 20 Oct 2018
Last visit: 08 Apr 2020
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please explain the answer of all the three question
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 16 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
8,945
 [4]
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. The passage is primarily concerned with

The passage primarily deals with Britain's reaction to the unrest in the United States during the period of the American Civil War and the impact of such reaction on it's relations with the Union.

A. the importance of cotton to British forces during the Civil War This is barely touched upon in the passage. Eliminate.

B. contrasting viewpoints on the industrial resources of the Union and the Confederacy The passage does not touch upon the industrial resources of the Union. Eliminate.

C. inconsistencies in the wartime policies of Lord Palmerston's government The government is stated to have a consistently neutral stand. Eliminate.

D. relations between Great Britain and the opposing factions of the Civil War Correct. Consistent with our thinking above.

E. economic turmoil fostered by American isolationism The passage does not talk about the economic consequences of American isolationism. Eliminate.

2. The passage suggests which of the following about American foreign policy during the nineteenth century?

A. The United States government was interested in improving relations with the allies of Great Britain. This is not mentioned in or implied by any part of the passage. Eliminate.

B. America was more concerned with domestic than foreign issues during this time. Correct. This is implied when the passage states: "Although the century between the War of 1812 and the First World War is accurately depicted as a time of American introspection, if not isolation...".

C. Americans believed it was their destiny to spread democracy to other nations of the world. This is not mentioned in or implied by any part of the passage. Eliminate.

D. Economic difficulties forced Americans to make concessions to distrustful foreign governments. This is not mentioned in or implied by any part of the passage. Eliminate.

E. America was involved in conflicts throughout the Western Hemisphere. This is not mentioned in or implied by any part of the passage. Eliminate.

3. With which of the following statements regarding Great Britain's attitude toward the American Civil War would the author most likely agree?

A. British government ministers were concerned for the welfare of their former colonies but refused to become entangled in another war on the American mainland. This is not mentioned in or implied by any part of the passage. Eliminate.

B. Victorian abolitionists chose to abide by the will of the Crown rather than their moral principles. The passage does not specify anything about Victorian abolitionists in particular - we don't know whether their position contradicted their moral principles. Eliminate.

C. Lord Palmerston refused to support the Confederates until they could prove that slaves in the South were treated humanely. This is not mentioned in or implied by any part of the passage. Eliminate.

D. Leaders of British industry had reservations about Lincoln's trade policies. This is not mentioned in or implied by any part of the passage. Eliminate.

E. British workers and industrialists disagreed over the whether to support the Southern secessionists. Correct. The position of workers is given as "...many of Britain’s increasingly powerful working class vocally sided with the Union as the champion of abolition" and that of industrialists is given as "many captains of British industry...thought it best to stay in their suppliers’ good graces...". These are clearly opposing positions.

Hope this helps.
avatar
GAngstA
Joined: 01 Feb 2021
Last visit: 05 Jul 2022
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 59
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
small summary about passage plz....
avatar
gurmeet2022
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Last visit: 14 Aug 2022
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
3
 [2]
Given Kudos: 46
Posts: 12
Kudos: 3
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
very tough passage.
Does these types of passage common in actual GMAT.
It is very time-consuming. How to read the passage within the time limit?? Experts, please share your views....
User avatar
shanks2020
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Last visit: 21 Mar 2024
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 239
Kudos: 39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
CrackverbalGMAT
1. The passage is primarily concerned with

The passage primarily deals with Britain's reaction to the unrest in the United States during the period of the American Civil War and the impact of such reaction on it's relations with the Union.

A. the importance of cotton to British forces during the Civil War This is barely touched upon in the passage. Eliminate.

B. contrasting viewpoints on the industrial resources of the Union and the Confederacy The passage does not touch upon the industrial resources of the Union. Eliminate.

C. inconsistencies in the wartime policies of Lord Palmerston's government The government is stated to have a consistently neutral stand. Eliminate.

D. relations between Great Britain and the opposing factions of the Civil War Correct. Consistent with our thinking above.

E. economic turmoil fostered by American isolationism The passage does not talk about the economic consequences of American isolationism. Eliminate.

2. The passage suggests which of the following about American foreign policy during the nineteenth century?

A. The United States government was interested in improving relations with the allies of Great Britain. This is not mentioned in or implied by any part of the passage. Eliminate.

B. America was more concerned with domestic than foreign issues during this time. Correct. This is implied when the passage states: "Although the century between the War of 1812 and the First World War is accurately depicted as a time of American introspection, if not isolation...".

C. Americans believed it was their destiny to spread democracy to other nations of the world. This is not mentioned in or implied by any part of the passage. Eliminate.

D. Economic difficulties forced Americans to make concessions to distrustful foreign governments. This is not mentioned in or implied by any part of the passage. Eliminate.

E. America was involved in conflicts throughout the Western Hemisphere. This is not mentioned in or implied by any part of the passage. Eliminate.

3. With which of the following statements regarding Great Britain's attitude toward the American Civil War would the author most likely agree?

A. British government ministers were concerned for the welfare of their former colonies but refused to become entangled in another war on the American mainland. This is not mentioned in or implied by any part of the passage. Eliminate.

B. Victorian abolitionists chose to abide by the will of the Crown rather than their moral principles. The passage does not specify anything about Victorian abolitionists in particular - we don't know whether their position contradicted their moral principles. Eliminate.

C. Lord Palmerston refused to support the Confederates until they could prove that slaves in the South were treated humanely. This is not mentioned in or implied by any part of the passage. Eliminate.

D. Leaders of British industry had reservations about Lincoln's trade policies. This is not mentioned in or implied by any part of the passage. Eliminate.

E. British workers and industrialists disagreed over the whether to support the Southern secessionists. Correct. The position of workers is given as "...many of Britain’s increasingly powerful working class vocally sided with the Union as the champion of abolition" and that of industrialists is given as "many captains of British industry...thought it best to stay in their suppliers’ good graces...". These are clearly opposing positions.

Hope this helps.


KarishmaB MartyTargetTestPrep

Can you please explain question 3 as to where in the passage we can say they differed? what they differed?
What is the "Union"mentioned in the passage?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
76,983
 [1]
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shanks2020


Can you please explain question 3 as to where in the passage we can say they differed? what they differed?
What is the "Union"mentioned in the passage?


3. With which of the following statements regarding Great Britain's attitude toward the American Civil War would the author most likely agree?

A. British government ministers were concerned for the welfare of their former colonies but refused to become entangled in another war on the American mainland.
B. Victorian abolitionists chose to abide by the will of the Crown rather than their moral principles.
C. Lord Palmerston refused to support the Confederates until they could prove that slaves in the South were treated humanely.
D. Leaders of British industry had reservations about Lincoln's trade policies.
E. British workers and industrialists disagreed over the whether to support the Southern secessionists.

It is not an official passage and with good reason. It would be difficult to understand, though there are enough clues, in case one doesn't know anything about the American Civil War

From the passage:
and although many captains of British industry, along with some ministers in Lord Palmerston’s government, thought it best to stay in their suppliers’ good graces (Southern secessionists)...

So industry leaders wanted to support the Southern secessionists

Also given:
Furthermore, many of Britain’s increasingly powerful working class vocally sided with the Union as the champion of abolition.

The workers sided with the Union (not with the secessionists). Union must be all states together from which the Southern states seceded.

Hence, answer (E)


There are clues to understand these points.

Southern secessionists anticipated British cooperation from the outset, pointing to the industrial giant’s reliance on American cotton in its innumerable mills. A prewar cotton glut, however, had reduced Britain’s demand for the South’s staple crop,

Southerners expected that Britishers would help them because British industry was dependent on the cotton that South produced.

Whether Victorian notions of human dignity eventually contributed to Britain’s neutrality is another question. While continuing to rely on such fruits of slavery as cotton and tobacco, Britain herself had abolished slavery

We don't know whether Britain stayed neutral (did not help South) because they wanted to conform to notions of human dignity. Cotton and tobacco industries (in South) must have had slavery and Britain continued to rely on these products though it abolished slavery.
User avatar
shanks2020
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Last visit: 21 Mar 2024
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 239
Kudos: 39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB
shanks2020


Can you please explain question 3 as to where in the passage we can say they differed? what they differed?
What is the "Union"mentioned in the passage?


3. With which of the following statements regarding Great Britain's attitude toward the American Civil War would the author most likely agree?

A. British government ministers were concerned for the welfare of their former colonies but refused to become entangled in another war on the American mainland.
B. Victorian abolitionists chose to abide by the will of the Crown rather than their moral principles.
C. Lord Palmerston refused to support the Confederates until they could prove that slaves in the South were treated humanely.
D. Leaders of British industry had reservations about Lincoln's trade policies.
E. British workers and industrialists disagreed over the whether to support the Southern secessionists.

It is not an official passage and with good reason. It would be difficult to understand, though there are enough clues, in case one doesn't know anything about the American Civil War

From the passage:
and although many captains of British industry, along with some ministers in Lord Palmerston’s government, thought it best to stay in their suppliers’ good graces (Southern secessionists)...

So industry leaders wanted to support the Southern secessionists

Also given:
Furthermore, many of Britain’s increasingly powerful working class vocally sided with the Union as the champion of abolition.

The workers sided with the Union (not with the secessionists). Union must be all states together from which the Southern states seceded.

Hence, answer (E)


There are clues to understand these points.

Southern secessionists anticipated British cooperation from the outset, pointing to the industrial giant’s reliance on American cotton in its innumerable mills. A prewar cotton glut, however, had reduced Britain’s demand for the South’s staple crop,

Southerners expected that Britishers would help them because British industry was dependent on the cotton that South produced.

Whether Victorian notions of human dignity eventually contributed to Britain’s neutrality is another question. While continuing to rely on such fruits of slavery as cotton and tobacco, Britain herself had abolished slavery

We don't know whether Britain stayed neutral (did not help South) because they wanted to conform to notions of human dignity. Cotton and tobacco industries (in South) must have had slavery and Britain continued to rely on these products though it abolished slavery.

KarishmaB

Thanks for the reply.
However, I could not understand from the passage that Secessionists are pitted against the Union.
Can you plz. let me know how would i understand from the passage this aspect.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shanks2020
KarishmaB
shanks2020


Can you please explain question 3 as to where in the passage we can say they differed? what they differed?
What is the "Union"mentioned in the passage?


3. With which of the following statements regarding Great Britain's attitude toward the American Civil War would the author most likely agree?

A. British government ministers were concerned for the welfare of their former colonies but refused to become entangled in another war on the American mainland.
B. Victorian abolitionists chose to abide by the will of the Crown rather than their moral principles.
C. Lord Palmerston refused to support the Confederates until they could prove that slaves in the South were treated humanely.
D. Leaders of British industry had reservations about Lincoln's trade policies.
E. British workers and industrialists disagreed over the whether to support the Southern secessionists.

It is not an official passage and with good reason. It would be difficult to understand, though there are enough clues, in case one doesn't know anything about the American Civil War

From the passage:
and although many captains of British industry, along with some ministers in Lord Palmerston’s government, thought it best to stay in their suppliers’ good graces (Southern secessionists)...

So industry leaders wanted to support the Southern secessionists

Also given:
Furthermore, many of Britain’s increasingly powerful working class vocally sided with the Union as the champion of abolition.

The workers sided with the Union (not with the secessionists). Union must be all states together from which the Southern states seceded.

Hence, answer (E)


There are clues to understand these points.

Southern secessionists anticipated British cooperation from the outset, pointing to the industrial giant’s reliance on American cotton in its innumerable mills. A prewar cotton glut, however, had reduced Britain’s demand for the South’s staple crop,

Southerners expected that Britishers would help them because British industry was dependent on the cotton that South produced.

Whether Victorian notions of human dignity eventually contributed to Britain’s neutrality is another question. While continuing to rely on such fruits of slavery as cotton and tobacco, Britain herself had abolished slavery

We don't know whether Britain stayed neutral (did not help South) because they wanted to conform to notions of human dignity. Cotton and tobacco industries (in South) must have had slavery and Britain continued to rely on these products though it abolished slavery.

KarishmaB

Thanks for the reply.
However, I could not understand from the passage that Secessionists are pitted against the Union.
Can you plz. let me know how would i understand from the passage this aspect.

"Union" means all together and "secession" means to pull away from a union so that helps. As I said before, it would be hard to understand for someone who doesn't know American history and GMAT tries to ensure that there is no regional preference. That said, RC passages will always be some what content driven and you may or may not know about it. Hence, reading on various topics is important, not to recall from memory but to be able to understand when the passage mentions details.
User avatar
shanks2020
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Last visit: 21 Mar 2024
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 239
Kudos: 39
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can you please explain question 3 as to where in the passage we can say they differed? what they differed?
What is the "Union"mentioned in the passage?[/quote]


3. With which of the following statements regarding Great Britain's attitude toward the American Civil War would the author most likely agree?

A. British government ministers were concerned for the welfare of their former colonies but refused to become entangled in another war on the American mainland.
B. Victorian abolitionists chose to abide by the will of the Crown rather than their moral principles.
C. Lord Palmerston refused to support the Confederates until they could prove that slaves in the South were treated humanely.
D. Leaders of British industry had reservations about Lincoln's trade policies.
E. British workers and industrialists disagreed over the whether to support the Southern secessionists.

It is not an official passage and with good reason. It would be difficult to understand, though there are enough clues, in case one doesn't know anything about the American Civil War

From the passage:
and although many captains of British industry, along with some ministers in Lord Palmerston’s government, thought it best to stay in their suppliers’ good graces (Southern secessionists)...

So industry leaders wanted to support the Southern secessionists

Also given:
Furthermore, many of Britain’s increasingly powerful working class vocally sided with the Union as the champion of abolition.

The workers sided with the Union (not with the secessionists). Union must be all states together from which the Southern states seceded.

Hence, answer (E)


There are clues to understand these points.

Southern secessionists anticipated British cooperation from the outset, pointing to the industrial giant’s reliance on American cotton in its innumerable mills. A prewar cotton glut, however, had reduced Britain’s demand for the South’s staple crop,

Southerners expected that Britishers would help them because British industry was dependent on the cotton that South produced.

Whether Victorian notions of human dignity eventually contributed to Britain’s neutrality is another question. While continuing to rely on such fruits of slavery as cotton and tobacco, Britain herself had abolished slavery

We don't know whether Britain stayed neutral (did not help South) because they wanted to conform to notions of human dignity. Cotton and tobacco industries (in South) must have had slavery and Britain continued to rely on these products though it abolished slavery.[/quote]

KarishmaB

Thanks for the reply.
However, I could not understand from the passage that Secessionists are pitted against the Union.
Can you plz. let me know how would i understand from the passage this aspect.[/quote]

"Union" means all together and "secession" means to pull away from a union so that helps. As I said before, it would be hard to understand for someone who doesn't know American history and GMAT tries to ensure that there is no regional preference. That said, RC passages will always be some what content driven and you may or may not know about it. Hence, reading on various topics is important, not to recall from memory but to be able to understand when the passage mentions details.[/quote]

KarishmaB

Thanks for the reply. To see how could i have understood better, sorry to repeat again- Can you plz. let me know how would i understand from the passage that Secesssion were pitted against The Union? And the Union was not just a union, it was "The Union of US states"?
Or according to you, this passage has some void?
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 16,265
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 482
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,265
Kudos: 76,983
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shanks2020
Can you please explain question 3 as to where in the passage we can say they differed? what they differed?
What is the "Union"mentioned in the passage?


3. With which of the following statements regarding Great Britain's attitude toward the American Civil War would the author most likely agree?

A. British government ministers were concerned for the welfare of their former colonies but refused to become entangled in another war on the American mainland.
B. Victorian abolitionists chose to abide by the will of the Crown rather than their moral principles.
C. Lord Palmerston refused to support the Confederates until they could prove that slaves in the South were treated humanely.
D. Leaders of British industry had reservations about Lincoln's trade policies.
E. British workers and industrialists disagreed over the whether to support the Southern secessionists.

It is not an official passage and with good reason. It would be difficult to understand, though there are enough clues, in case one doesn't know anything about the American Civil War

From the passage:
and although many captains of British industry, along with some ministers in Lord Palmerston’s government, thought it best to stay in their suppliers’ good graces (Southern secessionists)...

So industry leaders wanted to support the Southern secessionists

Also given:
Furthermore, many of Britain’s increasingly powerful working class vocally sided with the Union as the champion of abolition.

The workers sided with the Union (not with the secessionists). Union must be all states together from which the Southern states seceded.

Hence, answer (E)


There are clues to understand these points.

Southern secessionists anticipated British cooperation from the outset, pointing to the industrial giant’s reliance on American cotton in its innumerable mills. A prewar cotton glut, however, had reduced Britain’s demand for the South’s staple crop,

Southerners expected that Britishers would help them because British industry was dependent on the cotton that South produced.

Whether Victorian notions of human dignity eventually contributed to Britain’s neutrality is another question. While continuing to rely on such fruits of slavery as cotton and tobacco, Britain herself had abolished slavery

We don't know whether Britain stayed neutral (did not help South) because they wanted to conform to notions of human dignity. Cotton and tobacco industries (in South) must have had slavery and Britain continued to rely on these products though it abolished slavery.[/quote]

KarishmaB

Thanks for the reply.
However, I could not understand from the passage that Secessionists are pitted against the Union.
Can you plz. let me know how would i understand from the passage this aspect.[/quote]

"Union" means all together and "secession" means to pull away from a union so that helps. As I said before, it would be hard to understand for someone who doesn't know American history and GMAT tries to ensure that there is no regional preference. That said, RC passages will always be some what content driven and you may or may not know about it. Hence, reading on various topics is important, not to recall from memory but to be able to understand when the passage mentions details.[/quote]

KarishmaB

Thanks for the reply. To see how could i have understood better, sorry to repeat again- Can you plz. let me know how would i understand from the passage that Secesssion were pitted against The Union? And the Union was not just a union, it was "The Union of US states"?
Or according to you, this passage has some void?[/quote]

I think you are spending too much time analysing non official questions. Invest this time and effort in official questions and you will be served much better.
Knowing what secession is, one would be able to guess from context that the union is the one from which the South states seceded. Your takeaway from this question should be to read more articles on humanities. Whether this question is within the purview of GMAT, I would think not though one never knows.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,836
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,836
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
17289 posts
188 posts