Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
05 Oct 2025, 20:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
79% (01:44) correct
21%
(01:50)
wrong
based on 154
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Although the human resources department at C.W. Industries spent more than $100,000.00 last quarter hiring a team of efficiency consultants, that was money clearly not well spent. The current quarter has been the company’s least profitable in its 20-year history.
Which of the following most undermines the above conclusion?
A. Changing market conditions negatively affected C.W. Industries’ competitors, a select minority of whom also hired efficiency consultants but saw a noticeably better return on investment.
B. The reduced profit was not significant enough to induce the company to lay off any of its current workers, although several senior managers opted for negotiated buyout packages.
C. The company’s revenue rose sharply in the previous quarter, but profits were lower than analysts had expected.
D. C.W. Industries’ stock price was only modestly impacted by the decrease in profit.
E. The drop in both output and profit was due largely to a learning curve mounted by the line workers as they became acclimated to more efficient production methods.
Which of the following most undermines the above conclusion?
A. Changing market conditions negatively affected C.W. Industries’ competitors, a select minority of whom also hired efficiency consultants but saw a noticeably better return on investment.
B. The reduced profit was not significant enough to induce the company to lay off any of its current workers, although several senior managers opted for negotiated buyout packages.
C. The company’s revenue rose sharply in the previous quarter, but profits were lower than analysts had expected.
D. C.W. Industries’ stock price was only modestly impacted by the decrease in profit.
E. The drop in both output and profit was due largely to a learning curve mounted by the line workers as they became acclimated to more efficient production methods.
05 Oct 2025, 22:06
Kudos
Bookmarks
B,C & D are pretty far off & nowhere undermines the conclusion.
A & E is where most end up being confused.
For A-> Although A is weakening but not as strongly as E since E has a more direct impact saying the reason was completely different & the efficiency created a bigger impact on profit margins. whereas A is just a "might" be able to explain but it's not a strong answer.
A & E is where most end up being confused.
For A-> Although A is weakening but not as strongly as E since E has a more direct impact saying the reason was completely different & the efficiency created a bigger impact on profit margins. whereas A is just a "might" be able to explain but it's not a strong answer.
Akshat_verma_25
06 Oct 2025, 04:06
Kudos
Bookmarks
Choice A:
Tells us the impact of changing market conditions on competitors but not on CW Industries. We know market conditions have changed, but we do not know anything about the impact on CW Industries itself. Moreover, if some competitors succeeded with efficiency consultants despite negative market conditions, this might actually suggest C.W.'s consultants were ineffective in comparison.
Choice B:
The severity of the profit reduction (whether it was significant enough to cause layoffs or not) doesn't tell us what caused the low profitability or whether the consultants were effective. This choice discusses the magnitude of the problem, not its cause.
Choice C:
This discusses the previous quarter, not the current quarter mentioned in the conclusion. What happened before the consultants were hired is irrelevant to evaluating whether hiring them was money well spent based on current quarter results.
Choice D:
Stock price reaction tells us about investor perception, not about whether the consultants were effective or the money was well spent. Market sentiment is separate from the actual effectiveness of the consultants' work.
Choice E (Correct):
This provides an alternative explanation for the low profitability: workers are going through a learning curve while adjusting to the new, more efficient production methods recommended by the consultants. This suggests the low profitability may be temporary and the consultants' recommendations may ultimately improve efficiency - meaning the money may have been actually well spent. This directly weakens the conclusion.
Tells us the impact of changing market conditions on competitors but not on CW Industries. We know market conditions have changed, but we do not know anything about the impact on CW Industries itself. Moreover, if some competitors succeeded with efficiency consultants despite negative market conditions, this might actually suggest C.W.'s consultants were ineffective in comparison.
Choice B:
The severity of the profit reduction (whether it was significant enough to cause layoffs or not) doesn't tell us what caused the low profitability or whether the consultants were effective. This choice discusses the magnitude of the problem, not its cause.
Choice C:
This discusses the previous quarter, not the current quarter mentioned in the conclusion. What happened before the consultants were hired is irrelevant to evaluating whether hiring them was money well spent based on current quarter results.
Choice D:
Stock price reaction tells us about investor perception, not about whether the consultants were effective or the money was well spent. Market sentiment is separate from the actual effectiveness of the consultants' work.
Choice E (Correct):
This provides an alternative explanation for the low profitability: workers are going through a learning curve while adjusting to the new, more efficient production methods recommended by the consultants. This suggests the low profitability may be temporary and the consultants' recommendations may ultimately improve efficiency - meaning the money may have been actually well spent. This directly weakens the conclusion.
